Research Article
Centralization and Firm Performance: New Evidence on the Role of Firm Size
Table 7
Panel threshold model regression results.
| Variables | (1) ROA1 | (2) ROA1 | (3) ROA1 |
| Cen1 () | 22.030 (3.30) | | | | | | Cen1 () | 1.593 (1.58) | | | | | | Cen1 () | -0.869 (-0.94) | | | | | | Cen2 () | | 26.031 (4.38) | | | | | Cen2 () | | 3.581 (3.81) | | | | | Cen2 () | | -0.726 (-0.75) | | | | | Cen3 () | | | 7.732 (5.92) | | | | Cen3 () | | | 0.749 (0.68) | | | | Cen3 () | | | -1.081 (-2.09) | | | | Constant | 10.624 (14.96) | 11.642 (16.67) | 10.630 (11.88) | | Threshold | 19.3484 | 19.8792 | 19.3313 | 21.9209 | 20.1544 | 22.0892 | Control variable | Yes | Yes | Yes | Observations | 18,490 | 17,540 | 18,490 | -squared | 0.093 | 0.124 | 0.109 | | 61.93 | 86.44 | 64.26 |
|
|
Standard errors in parentheses. , , and . |