Research Article
Evaluation of Rural Tourism Carrying Capacity Based on Ecological Footprint Model
Table 3
Ecological footprint of accommodation in Nanyang City, 2011–2020 (unit: hm2).
| | Year | Accommodation built as eco-foot signs (ACCEFBU) | Accommodation carbon footprint (ACCEFCU) | Ecological footprint of accommodation (ACCEF) | Accommodation ecology per capita footprints (PACCEF) |
| | 2011 | 5.535 | 514.574 | 520.109 | 0.000577 | | 2012 | 5.535 | 582.001 | 587.537 | 0.000685 | | 2013 | 5.535 | 479.087 | 484.622 | 0.0004 | | 2014 | 12.752 | 541.749 | 554.500 | 0.000318 | | 2015 | 12.752 | 546.106 | 558.857 | 0.000277 | | 2016 | 12.752 | 532.761 | 545.512 | 0.000308 | | 2017 | 12.907 | 488.882 | 501.790 | 0.0002 | | 2018 | 10.495 | 288.105 | 298.600 | 0.0001 | | 2019 | 13.369 | 442.619 | 455.988 | 0.000160 | | 2020 | 13.369 | 511.576 | 524.945 | 0.000183 |
|
|
