Research Article
Optimizing the Prognostic Model of Cervical Cancer Based on Artificial Intelligence Algorithm and Data Mining Technology
Table 4
Different stratification analyzed on the Kaplan–Meier and ROC.
| Stratified factor | Group | Cases (%) | Kaplan–Meier value | AUC (95% CI) |
| Age at initial diagnosis | <50 | 177 (59.20%) | 1.38-05 | 0.717 (0.622-0.81) | ≥50 | 122 (40.80%) | 2.37-04 | 0.67 (0.555-0.785) | FIGO stage | I-IIA2 | 182 (60.88%) | 1.89-05 | 0.693 (0.601-0.785) | IIB-IV | 110 (36.79%) | 1.93-04 | 0.676 (0.556-0.799) | Histological type | SCC | 247 (82.61%) | 1.76-08 | 0.697 (0.615-0.779) | Adenocarcinoma | 46 (15.38%) | 3.68-03 | 0.674 (0.417-0.878) | Histologic grade | G2 | 131 (43.81%) | 2.88-04 | 0.627 (0.515-0.738) | G3 | 120 (40.13%) | 13.33-05 | 0.762 (0.636-0.888) |
|
|
95% CI: 95% confidence interval; SCC: squamous cell carcinoma.
|