Research Article
Improved Ant Lion Optimizer for Coverage Optimization in Wireless Sensor Networks
Table 6
The coverage rates of the five algorithms in experiment 2.
| | Metrics | IALO | ALO | PSO | FOA | GSO |
| | Mean | 0.79227 | 0.72887 | 0.66010 | 0.72116 | 0.60691 | Std | | | | | | Best | 0.80641 | 0.74323 | 0.70827 | 0.73651 | 0.62004 | Worst | 0.78046 | 0.70679 | 0.56853 | 0.68272 | 0.59624 |
| | Mean | 0.90010 | 0.83108 | 0.71850 | 0.83845 | 0.70815 | Std | | | | | | Best | 0.90962 | 0.84976 | 0.79331 | 0.85503 | 0.71806 | Worst | 0.89157 | 0.81256 | 0.61528 | 0.80525 | 0.69819 |
| | Mean | 0.96036 | 0.89981 | 0.74013 | 0.91508 | 0.79441 | Std | | | | | | Best | 0.96672 | 0.91706 | 0.81953 | 0.93925 | 0.80562 | Worst | 0.95329 | 0.87995 | 0.67545 | 0.86460 | 0.78722 |
| | Mean | 0.98486 | 0.94529 | 0.79494 | 0.95769 | 0.86995 | Std | | | | | | Best | 0.98709 | 0.95682 | 0.87494 | 0.96939 | 0.88118 | Worst | 0.98109 | 0.92239 | 0.73325 | 0.93539 | 0.86284 |
| | Mean | 0.99356 | 0.97189 | 0.82679 | 0.98498 | 0.93154 | Std | | | | | | Best | 0.99455 | 0.98038 | 0.91795 | 0.98895 | 0.93739 | Worst | 0.99214 | 0.95947 | 0.76388 | 0.97370 | 0.92491 |
|
|