Research Article
An Accurate Heart Disease Prognosis Using Machine Intelligence and IoMT
Table 5
Results of the proposed method in comparison with other methods based on numerical resources in Cleveland dataset.
| Method | Accuracy | Precision | Recall | Specificity | F-score |
| Logistic regression [8] | 83.3 | — | 86.3 | 82.3 | — | K-neighbors [8] | 84.8 | — | 85.0 | 77.7 | — | SVM [8] | 83.2 | — | 78.2 | 78.7 | — | Random forest [8] | 80.3 | — | 78.2 | 78.7 | — | Decision tree [8] | 82.3 | — | 78.5 | 78.9 | — | DL [8] | 94.2 | — | 82.3 | 83.1 | — | K-nearest neighbor [5] | 75.73 | — | — | — | — | Decision trees [5] | 72.45 | — | — | — | — | Random forest [5] | 75.73 | — | — | — | — | Multilayer perceptron [5] | 67.54 | — | — | — | — | Naïve Bayes [5] | 76.26 | — | — | — | — | Linear support vector machine [5] | 77.73 | — | — | — | — | Faster R-CNN with SE-ResNeXt-101 [4] | 98.00 | 96.16 | 98.47 | 96.02 | 97.58 | Proposed method | 98.7 | 96.61 | 99.18 | 96.65 | 98.48 |
|
|