Research Article
Spatial Identification and Distribution Pattern of the Complexity of Rural Poverty in China Using Multisource Spatial Data
Table 5
Poverty indices of 14 contiguous specially poor areas of China.
| Poverty index | NII | SEPAI | PPI |
| Liupan Mountains area | 2.82 | 0.82 | 2.64 | Qinba Mountains area | 2.72 | 1.06 | 2.68 | Wuling Mountain area | 2.29 | 0.94 | 2.26 | Wumeng Mountain area | 2.33 | 0.60 | 2.95 | Stony desertification area in Yunnan, Guangxi, and Guizhou | 2.10 | 0.67 | 2.26 | Mountain area in western Yunnan | 1.99 | 0.86 | 2.82 | South Foothills of the Greater Khingan Range | 2.99 | 0.79 | 2.09 | Yanshan-Taihang Mountains area | 2.91 | 1.02 | 2.44 | Lvliang Mountains area | 2.84 | 0.94 | 2.33 | Dabie Mountain area | 2.39 | 0.68 | 1.95 | Luoxiao Mountain area | 2.29 | 0.87 | 2.01 | Tibetan areas of Sichuan | 3.61 | 0.92 | 3.15 | Kashgar, Khotan, and Kizilsu Kirgiz in southern Xinjiang | 3.66 | 0.99 | 3.00 | Tibet | 4.34 | ā | ā |
|
|