Review Article

Voice Assistant Utilization among the Disability Community for Independent Living: A Rapid Review of Recent Evidence

Table 1

Inclusion and exclusion criteria.

CriteriaInclusionExclusion criteria

PopulationPeople with disabilities (PWD) in the home and community settingPWD in rehabilitation, hospital, or long-term care facilities, or no mention of PWD
InterventionAny mainstream personal voice assistantDescribes technical developments but not use by PWD, except for developments aimed at eliminating specific barriers of existing voice assistants
Technology that requires nonvoice input or nonvoice equivalent input to accomplish the primary function
ComparisonNone or control groupNone
Outcome of interestUsage and impact on independence and participationInsufficient information on how interactions support or hinder participation and independence
Time2021–present (via date limiters)Pre-2021 (via date limiters)
LanguageEnglish or SpanishOther languages

includes disabilities of any type of disability (e.g., motor, sensory, speech, and intellectual) among any adult age group. includes Amazon Alexa, Google Assistant, Apple Siri, Microsoft’s Cortana, and Samsung Bixby.