Research Article
Swin Transformer and the Unet Architecture to Correct Motion Artifacts in Magnetic Resonance Image Reconstruction
Table 1
Comparison of state-of-art motion correction methods.
| Year proposed | Method | Parameters | Resizing module | Activation function | Training time (h min) |
| 2018 | MoCo-Net | 47,120,129 | MaxPooling | ReLU | 67 20 | 2019 | Namer-Net | 893,899 | — | ReLU | 81 24 | 2020 | Modified-2D-Net | 3,363,215 | Conv with stride 2 | ReLU | 23 52 | 2022 | MC-Net | 5,496,001 | MaxPooling | ReLU, sigmoid | 20 44 | 2022 | Stacked-Unet | 4,017,966 | Average_pooling, GlobalMax_pooling | ReLU | 136 49 | 2023 | Mark-Net | 1,623,236 | MaxPooling | LeakyReLU | 23 22 | — | Proposed MACS-Net | 33,227,907 | Patch merging, dual upsampling | GELU, ELU | 56 54 |
|
|