Accounting for BEV Users’ Risk Attitudes and Charging Inertia in En Route Charging Choice Behavior

Table 4

Estimated results for the en route charging choice model (decision 1).

Variables	ICLV (M2)		ICLV with interactions (M3)		MNL (M1)
	Coefficient	t-test	Coefficient	t-test	Coefficient	t-test
Choice model
ASC, not charge	−3.41	−8.88	−3.29	−8.62	−2.83	−6.36
Average AR at destination (in kilometres)	0.217	18.9	0.22	18.8	0.219	19.1
Initial AR at origin (in kilometres)	0.0169	2.34	0.0187	2.55	0.0169	2.35
AR uncertainty at destination (in kilometres)	−0.0484	−7.78	−0.0673	−8.25	−0.0487	−7.83
Risk attitudes	−0.286	−2.95
Charging inertia	−0.168	−1.8
Risk attitudes  uncertainty in AR			−0.0218	−3.64
Charging inertia  uncertainty in AR			−0.0129	−2.4
Age (more than 30 years old = 1, otherwise = 0)					—	—
Battery range (more than 300 km = 1, otherwise = 0)					—	—
Charging frequency (usually charge = 1, otherwise = 0)					−0.936	−4.53
Driving experience (more than 18 months = 1, otherwise = 0)					—	—
Driving frequency (everyday = 1, otherwise = 0)					—	—
DVKT (more than 50 km = 1, otherwise = 0)					—	—
Education (master or above = 1, otherwise = 0)					—	—
Gender (female = 1, otherwise = 0)					—	—
Income (more than 10,000 RMB, otherwise = 0)					—	—
Model fitness
^#Parameters	42		42		14
Final log-likelihood	−590.8914		−580.7882		−751.0192
Adjusted rho-square	0.419		0.419		0.389
No. of observations	1808		1808		1808

Significance at 1% level; significance at 5% level; significance at 10% level. DVKT, daily vehicle kilometres traveled; —, the corresponding variable is not significant.