Systematic Review and Psychometric Properties Analysis of First-, Middle-, and Top-Level Nurse Manager’s Core Competencies Instruments

Table 3

The methodological quality of psychometric properties and level of evidence of included studies.

Authors (no. of reference)	Relevance	Comprehensiveness	Comprehensibility	Overall content validity	Structural validity	Internal consistency	Reliability	Construct validity	Recommendation
Wang et al., 2022 [22]	−/M	−/M	+/M	+/M	−/M	+/M	?/M		B
Collins et al., 2017 [23]	+/M	+/M	+/M	?/M	−/L	?/L			B
Chase, 2010 [5]	+/M	+/M	+/M	+/M	−/M	+/M	+/M	+/M	B
Donaher et al., 2007 [24]	+/L	−/L	?/L	−/L	−/L	+/L		+/L	B
Gunawan et al., 2019 [25]	+/M	+/M	+/M	+/M	−/M	+/M			A
DeOnna, 2006 [26]	+/M	+/M	+/M	+/M	−/L	+/L		+/L	A
Moghaddam et al., 2019 [27]	+/M	+/M	+/M	+/M		+/L	+/L		A
Tongmuangtunyatep et al., 2015 [28]	+/H	+/H	+/H	+/H	+/H	+/H		+/H	A
Shuman et al., 2017 [29]	+/M	+/M	+/M	+/M	?/M	+/M			A
Rosenfeld et al., 2012 [30]	−/M	+/M	+/M	+/M	−/VL	?/VL	+/VL		B

Methodological quality of the study measurement properties was rated as follows: + = sufficient; − = insufficient; and ? = indeterminate. Quality of evidence was rated as follows: H = high; M = moderate; L = low; and VL = very low.