Abstract

Objective. This study examined the preliminary reliability and validity of the PedsQL™ Family Impact Module (PedsQL FIM) in families of children with Barth syndrome (BTHS). Method. A total of 72 parents with children or youth between the ages of 5 and 19 participated in this study. Thirty-three parents of children with BTHS and 39 parents of unaffected children completed the PedsQL FIM and a demographic information form. Internal consistency reliability and item-total correlations were calculated to test the reliability of the PedsQL FIM. Construct validity was examined using the known-groups method. We estimated the mean score differences of the PedsQL FIM between the two groups using three different models, including unadjusted, multivariate regression, and propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW) models. Results. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were greater than 0.70 for all scales of the PedsQL FIM, except for the communication scale. The item-total correlations were significant for all scales with moderate to high correlations (). In construct validity, the mean scores of the PedsQL FIM between the two groups were significantly different () for all scales and total score in the unadjusted and PS-IPTW models. However, in the multivariate regression model, the family relationships scale was not significant between the two groups. Conclusion. The PedsQL FIM demonstrated adequate measurement properties of preliminary reliability and validity in assessing the impact of children with BTHS on parental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and family functioning. Further research needs to be conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the PedsQL FIM with a large sample of BTHS and with other pediatric rare diseases.

1. Introduction

With the rapid advancement of knowledge in the field of human genetics, it has become increasingly imperative for occupational therapists to possess a comprehensive understanding of rare genetic disorders to effectively provide healthcare services to their clients [1]. Barth syndrome (BTHS) is a rare, X-linked disorder found primarily in boys [2]. In the United States, BTHS occurs in approximately 1 in every 1,000,000 births [3]. BTHS is characterized by cardiomyopathy, neutropenia, muscle weakness, growth delays, and exercise intolerance [4, 5].

Cardiomyopathy typically manifests during the first two years, predominantly affecting males who exhibit left ventricular dysfunction and have symptoms indicative of heart failure [6, 7]. Neutropenia refers to reduced neutrophils in white blood cells, which play an important role in guarding against bacterial infections [8, 9]. BTHS displays skeletal muscle weakness and easy onset of fatigue; participating in physical activities is difficult and requires great energy [4, 10]. Gross motor development in BTHS is delayed, and children with BTHS typically have small stature and low weight in their childhood, both of which are below average [11]. BTHS is classified as a mitochondrial disease exhibiting muscular and neurological problems, leading to mitochondrial dysfunction and deficient cardiolipin [8, 11]. Mitochondria is a main producer of energy in cells, and cardiolipin deficiency leads to mitochondria not generating enough essential lipids crucial for maintaining mitochondrial structure leading to muscle weakness and exercise intolerance [12, 13]. There is no cure or specific treatment yet available for BTHS. Therefore, their families need life-long support to cope with the daily caregiving challenges they might face.

Storch et al. [7] reported that parents of children with BTHS have significantly higher stress and distress levels than parents of unaffected children. In addition, Lim [14] reported that parental health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and family functioning of the parents of children with BTHS were significantly lower than those of unaffected children. HRQoL is a multidimensional construct encompassing physical, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning that impacts an individual’s overall health and wellness [15, 16]. Quality of life, which is often interchangeably used with HRQoL for certain constructs, is one of the important target outcomes of occupational therapy to enhance clients’ ability to engage in desired occupations as well as their caregivers [17]. Several studies found that parental HRQoL and family functioning are affected by their child’s health conditions [14, 1820]. The measurement of parental HRQoL could provide significant insights into addressing the healthcare needs of families as they confront the difficulties associated with their child’s illness. However, identifying the relationship among a child’s illness, the course of the illness, and the impact on the family is a multifaceted and intricate process [21]. Therefore, choosing an optimal instrument to assess the impact of the child’s health condition on families, including parents in particular, is critically important.

The PedsQL FIM assesses parental HRQoL and family functioning [22], which has been reported as a reliable and valid measure in assessing the impact of a child’s health condition on parental HRQoL and family functioning [2125]. In rare disease populations, however, there is a lack of evidence of the psychometric properties of the PedsQL FIM. According to the current Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, it is imperative to present evidence of the reliability and validity of an instrument when utilized for a particular population [26]. Therefore, this study examined the preliminary reliability and validity of the PedsQL FIM in families of children with BTHS. We hypothesized that the PedsQL FIM would distinguish between families of children with BTHS and those with unaffected children.

2. Methods

The PedsQL FIM data were previously analyzed and reported to investigate the impact of raising children with rare diseases on parental quality of life and family functioning [14]. However, the reliability and validity of the instrument were assumed and not fully reported in the previous study. In this study, the item and scale scores were reanalyzed to examine the preliminary reliability and validity of the PedsQL FIM in families of children with BTHS.

2.1. Participants

A total of 72 parents with children or youth between the ages of 5 and 19 participated in this study. Inclusion criteria included (1) parents of children with BTHS, or unaffected children, and (2) parents who were English-speaking and able to read at an 8th-grade level. Thirty-three parents of children with BTHS were recruited by the Barth Syndrome Foundation. Thirty-nine parents of unaffected children were recruited by word of mouth and by flyers posted on the University of Florida (UF) department websites and Listserv, Facebook groups, and HealthStreet. This study was approved by the UF Institutional Review Board. Written informed consent was obtained from each parent.

2.2. Instrument
2.2.1. The PedsQL™ Family Impact Module

The PedsQL™ Family Impact Module (PedsQL FIM) is a 36-item questionnaire assessing the impact of pediatric chronic health conditions on parental HRQoL and family functioning [22]. This assessment consists of 8 scales: (1) physical functioning, (2) emotional functioning, (3) social functioning, (4) cognitive functioning, (5) communication, (6) worry, (7) daily activities, and (8) family relationships. Each item is scored on a 5-point scale (never a problem = 0, almost never = 1, sometimes = 2, often = 3, and almost always = 4) and transformed to a 0 to 100 scale (never a problem = 100, almost never = 75, sometimes = 50, often = 25, and almost always = 0). The total score of the PedsQL FIM is calculated using the mean of the 36 items. Within the PedsQL FIM, the Parental HRQoL score is calculated by the mean of the items in the physical functioning, emotional functioning, social functioning, and cognitive functioning. The family functioning score is calculated by the mean of the items in daily activities and family relationships. Higher scores indicate better parental HRQoL and family functioning.

2.2.2. The Demographic Information Form

The demographic information form, generated by the investigators of this study, consisted of (1) the child’s date of birth and age, (2) marital status, (3) race, (4) employment, (5) level of education, and (6) family income.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The child and parent demographic variables and study variables were analyzed with an independent-samples -test for continuous variables and with Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Internal consistency reliability was calculated with Cronbach’s alpha. Scales with coefficient values greater than 0.70 were considered acceptable group-level analyses [27]. Additionally, item-total correlations were calculated using the Pearson correlation coefficient to assess the relationship between each item comprising scales and the scale’s total score.

Construct validity was determined using the known-groups method [28]. The scale scores of the PedsQL FIM were compared between the parents of children with BTHS and parents of unaffected children. In the analysis, we estimated the mean score differences between the two groups using three different models including an unadjusted model (independent-samples -test), multivariate regression model, and propensity score matching with inverse probability of treatment weighting (PS-IPTW) [29, 30]. Since the two groups would likely have heterogeneous demographic characteristics and those confounding factors could lead to biased point estimates [29, 30], the PS-IPTW method was applied to control for the demographic differences between the two-comparison groups. When the demographic characteristics were not balanced after the PS-IPTW, those variables were additionally controlled for the group comparisons [31]. Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS statistical software version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc.). The alpha level was set at.05.

3. Results

Among 72 parents, 33 parents of children with BTHS and 39 parents of unaffected children completed the PedsQL FIM and demographic information form. There were two missing data in the parent employment status, one person each from the groups.

3.1. Demographic Characteristics

Table 1 displays summary statistics for child and parent demographic variables. Four out of 7 demographic variables were significantly different between the two groups, including child sex, parent race, education, and employment status (all ). Since BTHS is an X-linked disorder that occurs in the male population, the BTHS group in this study consisted of males only, which caused the child sex variable significantly different between the two groups. In the parent demographic variables, 20 (51.30%) parents were Non-Hispanic White in the unaffected group versus 31 (93.94%) in the BTHS group. Similarly, 31 (79.49%) of parents in the unaffected group had a graduate or professional degree, as compared to 11 (33.33%) in the BTHS group. Thirty-one of the parents (79.49%) in the unaffected group were employed full-time versus 18 parents (54.55%) of the children with BTHS. Based on these results, construct validity was examined by controlling for those significant demographic variables between the two groups using the PS-IPTW methods in the following section.

3.2. Reliability

Table 2 presents the internal consistency reliability and item-total correlations of the PedsQL FIM for the unaffected and BTHS groups. The PedsQL FIM demonstrated strong internal consistency. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficients were greater than 0.70 for all scales, except for the communication in the BTHS group. The item-total correlations were all significant with moderate to high correlations for both groups (all ).

3.3. Construct Validity

Before applying the PS-IPTW method, child sex, parent race, education, and employment status were significantly different between the two groups (all ). After applying the PS-IPTW method, all demographic characteristics were balanced (all ), except for parent race () and parent education (). These unbalanced characteristics were adjusted again when comparing the group differences. Table 3 displays the mean score differences of the PedsQL FIM between the BTHS and unaffected groups using unadjusted, multivariate regression, and PS-IPTW adjustment models. Regardless of the estimation method, the mean scores between the two groups were significantly different in the unadjusted and PS-IPTW models (), except for the family relationships in the multivariate regression model.

4. Discussion

This study investigated the preliminary reliability and validity of the PedsQL FIM in measuring parental HRQoL and family functioning of children with BTHS. The PedsQL FIM demonstrated adequate measurement properties of preliminary reliability and validity in assessing the impact of children with BTHS on parental HRQoL and family functioning. The significant differences in the demographic characteristics between the two groups (e.g., employment status) were controlled for by applying the PS-IPTW method, which improved the methodological rigor of the analysis.

In reliability, Cronbach’s alpha coefficients in both groups exceeded the minimum expected value for group-level analyses of 0.70 [27], except for the communication scale in the BTHS group. Likewise, previous psychometric studies for the PedsQL FIM demonstrated the lowest Cronbach’s alpha value in the communication scale [21, 22, 24, 25, 32]. The item-total correlations were significant in both groups (all ), indicating that each item that makes up scales is correlated with appropriate scales with moderate to high relationships [23]. Although the communication scale of the BTHS group demonstrated Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.56, the item-total correlations ranged from .637 to .722 () with high correlation, meaning that the three items comprising the communication scale were significantly correlated with the scale. Scarpelli et al. [25] investigated the psychometric property of the PedsQL FIM for families with pediatric cancer and found that Cronbach’s alpha of a few scales including the communication was below 0.70. They suggested that these scales should be exclusively utilized only for descriptive or exploratory studies. While the communication scale did not meet the minimum standard value for group-level analyses, the findings still provide supporting evidence for the preliminary reliability of the PedsQL FIM for families of children with BTHS, which is consistent with the previous studies that examined the reliability of the instrument for pediatric chronic health conditions [21, 22, 24].

In construct validity, the mean scores of the PedsQL FIM between the parents of children with BTHS and those of unaffected children were significantly different for all scales () both in the unadjusted and PS-ITPW models. In other words, the scores of the parental HRQoL and family functioning in the BTHS group were significantly lower than those in the unaffected group, indicating that the presence of their child’s disease entails constraints and challenges in the overall functioning of the entire family unit [22]. In the multivariate regression model, however, the family relationships scale was nonsignificant between the groups (). In the unadjusted model using independent-samples -test, the standard error of the mean difference of the family relationships scale between the two groups was 4.92 whereas the standard error was increased to 6.28 in the multivariate regression model. In other words, while the mean differences between the unadjusted and multivariate regression models were fairly consistent, there was a 27.6% increase in the standard error in the multivariate regression model, leading to the nonsignificant estimation of the family relationships scale. Typically, standard error could be inflated by a small sample size and multicollinearity among study variables [33]. Since this study utilized a relatively small sample size of 72 for the multivariate regression model, further research with a larger sample size would be needed to examine if the family relationships scale distinguishes between the BTHS and unaffected groups. Although the family relationships scale was not significantly different between the two groups after controlling for demographic variables in the multivariate regression model, the finding still provides appropriate evidence for the construct validity of the PedsQL FIM in the BTHS group, which is consistent with a previous study that compared mean scores of the PedsQL FIM between parents of children with and without chronic health conditions [21].

There are several limitations to this study. Due to the generic issue of rare disease research (e.g., low prevalence), this study is limited by the relatively small sample size. Since this study used convenient sampling, selection bias might occur in choosing participants. This cross-sectional study collected the data at a one-time point, so we could not examine the stability of the information using the test-retest reliability. The participants of this study were mostly white, middle-class, and highly educated. By applying the PS-IPTW method, however, the heterogeneous demographic characteristics of the participants were controlled for the analysis. Future studies should conduct the psychometric property of the PedsQL FIM with a large BTHS sample and other pediatric rare diseases. Additionally, the measurement of criterion and convergent validity of the PedsQL FIM would provide the degrees to which the instrument correlates with other established family impact instruments and pediatric rare disease symptom assessments.

5. Conclusions

This study provided evidence of good preliminary reliability and validity of the PedsQL FIM in measuring the impact of children with BTHS on parental HRQoL and family functioning. By applying the PS-IPTW method, this study enhanced the methodological rigor in examining the reliability and validity of the PedsQL FIM. In addition, measuring family impact using the PedsQL FIM will help better understand the impact of children with BTHS on parental HRQoL and family functioning. It will also provide crucial information for health professionals and researchers to develop holistic and comprehensive healthcare services for families.

Data Availability

The data used for this study are available from Yoonjeong Lim, the first author of this manuscript. Please contact her at ylim3@binghamton.edu to request the data.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors report no conflicts of interest.