Review Article
Current Status and Future Perspectives of Artificial Intelligence in Magnetic Resonance Breast Imaging
Table 1
Brief overview of common data-driven techniques used in breast MRI.
| | Technique | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
| | Supervised learning | | | | | Ensemble of decision trees | Decision using branches Variable significance and feature selection are included | Prone to overfitting | [12–14] | | [15, 16] | | Random forest | High performance Compared to decision trees | Prone to overfitting | [14, 17, 18] | | [19] | | Support vector machines | Transforms nonlinear classification problem into linear one High accuracy | Difficult computation in high-dimensional data space | [20, 21] | | [22, 23] | | [24] | | Neural networks | Weights need to be adapted for training Multiclass classification | No strategy to determine network structure | [25–27] | | [28, 29] | | [30, 31] | | Deep learning | State-of-the-art in image-derived features | Computationally intensive Hard to interpret | [32, 33] | | [34–36] | | [37–39] |
| | Unsupervised learning | | | | | Clustering (k-means) | Brief training duration | Number of clusters must be known in advance | [40, 41] | | Topological data analysis | Interpretable data mapping Discovery of variable relationships | Divided clusters due to mapping | [28, 42, 43] |
|
|