Research Article

Prediction of Loss of Muscle Mass in Sarcopenia Using Ultrasonic Diaphragm Excursion

Table 2

Comparison of body composition and diaphragm excursion between groups A and B.

VariableGroup AGroup B value

Dq (cm)2.01 (1.71–2.29)1.51 (0.92–2.10)0.166
Df (cm)6.18 (5.57–6.79)4.36 (3.49–5.22)0.008
FVC2.83 (2.63–3.03)2.31 (1.94–2.69)0.011
FEV1.02.04 (1.87–2.21)1.60 (1.32–1.86)0.018
PEF5.40 (4.81–5.99)3.78 (3.03–4.54)0.019
Pimax64.20 (57.23–71.16)45.45 (36.56–54.35)0.017
WRmax104.26 (97.08–111.44)70.73 (61.71–79.75)0.000
VO2max1.30 (1.21–1.39)0.88 (0.79–0.97)0.000
VEmax53.12 (49.01–57.24)41.05 (36.01–46.08)0.000
VTmax2.61 (2.36–2.86)2.03 (1.69–2.36)0.001

Dq, ultrasonic diaphragm excursion during quiet breathing; Df, ultrasonic diaphragm excursion during forced deep breathing; FVC, forced vital capacity; FEV1.0, forced expiratory volume in one second; PEF, peak expiratory flow; Pimax, maximal inspiratory pressure; WRmax, maximal work rate; VO2max, maximal oxygen consumption; VEmax, peak minute ventilation during exercise; VTmax, peak tidal volume during exercise.