Research Article
[Retracted] Value of Defecography in the Diagnostic and Therapeutic Management of the Modified Wells Procedure for Rectal Prolapse
Table 1
Radiographic findings of defecography in 107 patients.
| Parameters | Male n = 44 | Female n = 63 | value |
| Oxford radiological grading | | | <0.01 | No rectal prolapse | 23 (52.27) | 12 (19.05) | | Internal rectal Prolapse (I-II) | 4 (9.09) | 8 (12.70) | | Internal rectal Prolapse (III-IV) | 11 (25) | 28 (44.44) | | Rectal prolapse (V) | 6 (13.64) | 15 (23.81) | |
| Perineal descent | | | <0.01 | Combine | 14 (31.82) | 46 (73.02) | | Not combine | 30 (68.18) | 17 (26.98) | |
| Rectocele | | | <0.01 | Combine | 13 (29.55) | 51 (80.95) | | Not combine | 31 (70.45) | 12 (19.05) | |
| Spastic pelvic floor syndrome | | | 0.11 | Combine | 10 (22.73) | 7 (11.11) | | Not combine | 34 (77.27) | 56 (88.89) | |
| Colon redundancy | | | 0.75 | Combine | 12 (27.27) | 19 (30.16) | | Not combine | 32 (72.73) | 44 (69.84) | |
| Sacrorectal separation | | | 0.51a | Combine | 0 (0) | 2 (3.17) | | Not combine | 44 (100) | 61 (96.83) | |
|
|
Significance was estimated using chi-square test. a Significance was estimated using Fisher’s exact test.
|