| Trials | Design | Country; ethnicity | Year | Sex (M/F) | Case | Control | Case | Control | HWE (p) | DD | ID | II | DD | ID | II |
| Harden, 1995 | Case control | UK; European | NR | NR | `100 | 98 | 40 | 41 | 19 | 39 | 42 | 17 | 0.3351 | Huang, 2010 | Case control | China; Asian | NR | NR | 130 | 120 | 19 | 67 | 44 | 10 | 52 | 58 | 0.7280 | Hunley, 1996 | Case control | USA; American | 6–83 | 43/21 | 40# | 24∗ | 8 | 24 | 8 | 1 | 14 | 9 | 0.1258 | Lau, 2002 | Case control | Singapore; Asian | NR | 45/55 | 100 | 90 | 8 | 43 | 49 | 8 | 40 | 42 | 0.7265 | Lau, 2004 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 43 ± 10; C: 48 ± 14 | P: 56/62; C: 42/52 | 118 | 94 | 17 | 48 | 53 | 4 | 43 | 47 | 0.1280 | Frimat, 2000 | Case control | France; European | NR | NR | 274 | 960 | 89 | 132 | 53 | 288 | 470 | 202 | 0.6891 | Maruyama, 2001 | Case control | Japan; Asian | P: 10.6 ± 2.9; C : NR | P: 56/39; C : NR | 95 | 99 | 15 | 42 | 38 | 10 | 33 | 56 | 0.1362 | Pawlik, 2014 | Case control | Poznan; European | P : NR; C: 38.1 ± 12.8 | P : NR; C: 105/82 | 31 | 187 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 47 | 100 | 40 | 0.3315 | Pei, 1997 | Case control | Canada; American | NR | NR | 168 | 100 | 55 | 81 | 32 | 30 | 49 | 21 | 0.9045 | Rodríguez-Pérez, 2009 | Case control | Spain; Europen | P: 33–46; C: 29–46 | P: 10/3; C: 42/9 | 13 | 51 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 21 | 24 | 6 | 0.8287 | Santos, 2002 | Case control | USA; American | NR | NR | 79 | 53 | 17 | 45 | 17 | 13 | 32 | 8 | 0.1119 | Schmidt, 1995 | Case control | Germany, Australia, Italy; mixed | NR | P: 153/51; C : NR | 204 | 234 | 79 | 81 | 44 | 77 | 117 | 40 | 0.6949 | Stratta, 1999 | Case control | Italy; European | NR | P: 67/14; C: 25/25 | 81 | 50 | 35 20# | 30 16# | 16 5# | 21 9∗ | 20 13∗ | 9 8∗ | 0.2853 0.4684 | Suzuki, 2000 | Case control | Japan; Asian | P: 39.2 ± 12.3; C: 34.9 ± 13.5 | P: 49/34; C: 117/133 | 83# | 250∗ | 13# | 31# | 39# | 35∗ | 107∗ | 108∗ | 0.3100 | Syrjänen, 2000 | Case control | Finland; European | NR | NR | 26# | 142∗ | 9# | 16# | 1# | 45∗ | 67∗ | 30∗ | 0.5861 | Tanaka, 1998 | Case control | Japan; Asian | NR | NR | 97 | 71 | 15 | 48 | 34 | 9 | 35 | 27 | 0.6513 | Woo, 2004 | Case control | Singapore; Asian | P: 43 ± 10; C: 48 ± 14 | P: 56/62; C: 42/52 | 118 | 94 | 17 | 48 | 53 | 4 | 43 | 47 | 0.1280 | Yoshida, 1995 | Case control | Japan; Asian | P: 38.2 ± 2.1; C: 35.8 ± 1.8 | P: 34/19; C: 24/22 | 53 | 46 | 16 12# | 17 8# | 20 8# | 3 4∗ | 24 9∗ | 19 12∗ | 0.2045 0.3225 | Hu, 1997 | Case control | China; Asian | 36.5 ± 7.5 | 55/27 | 51# | 31∗ | 14# | 26# | 11# | 8∗ | 13∗ | 10∗ | 0.3797 | Li, 2007 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 34.8 ± 15.8; C: 33.1 ± 13.9 | P: 30/34; C: 26/54 | 64 | 80 | 8 | 32 | 24 | 6 | 42 | 32 | 0.1196 | Liao, 2003 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 17–68; C: 19–65 | P: 60/35; C: 58/47 | 95 | 105 | 27 | 35 | 33 | 21 | 42 | 42 | 0.0877 | Liu, 2005 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 29.7 ± 10.7; C: NR | P: 98/48; C : NR | 146 | 146 | 18 | 78 | 50 | 9 | 86 | 51 | 0.0006 | Liu, 1997 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 9–42; C: 18–55 | P: 106/71; C: 54/96 | 177 | 150 | 31 | 81 | 65 | 9 | 59 | 82 | 0.7059 | Song, 2017 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 42.9 ± 12.3; C: 43.7 ± 13.5 | P: 23/22; C: 27/18 | 45 | 45 | 9 | 18 | 18 | 15 | 18 | 12 | 0.1876 | Xu, 2001 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 11–56; C: 20–68 | P: 63/47; C: 73/43 | 110 | 116 | 25 | 39 | 46 | 24 | 40 | 52 | 0.0039 | You, 2013 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 33.6 ± 12.5; C: 31.5 ± 10.8 | P: 36/32; C: 34/36 | 68 | 70 | 26 | 30 | 12 | 13 | 39 | 18 | 0.3154 | Zheng, 1999 | Case control | China; Asian | P: 29.8; C: 33.1 | P: 44/28; C: 16/70 | 72 | 86 | 9 | 36 | 27 | 8 | 44 | 34 | 0.2419 |
|
|
Note. P: IgA nephropathy subjects; C: control subjects; HB, hospital based; PB: population based; NR: not reported; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; RFLP, restriction fragment length polymorphism. #Progression of IgAN; ∗nonprogression of IgAN.
|