Review Article

A Systematic Review of the Effect of Oral Rinsing with H2O2 on Clinical and Microbiological Parameters Related to Plaque, Gingivitis, and Microbes

Table 3

Main characteristics and results for the studies that assess gingival inflammation.

Study, year, country (reference)
Study design
Systemic conditions;
Diagnosis of the oral condition
Gingival index assessed
H2O2 group (concentration);
Rinsing protocol
N (smokers)
Age
Baseline;
N(M)/N(F)
End
N(M)/N(F)
CHX group (concentration); Rinsing protocol
N (smokers);
Age
Baseline;
N(M)/N(F)
End
N(M)/N(F)
Control group
Rinsing protocol
N (smokers)
Age
Baseline;
N(M)/N(F)
End
N(M)/N(F)
Main results (follow-up)
Baseline scores
Mean ± SD
End scores (follow-up)
Mean ± SD
∆ (%)Author conclusions

Studies without experimental gingivitis
Boyd, 1989, USA [15]
Non-RCT
Systemically healthy
Adolescents with initial good oral health scheduled
to have fixed orthodontic treatment
GI (L & S) and BT (A)
H2O2 1.5% + 0.05% NaF + toothbrush
Once a day (1/2 ounce per one minute) during 18 months
Smokers NR
Mean age:13.2 yrs
Baseline: 9/17
End: 24 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
NA0.05% NaF + toothbrush
Once a day (1/2 ounce per one minute) during 18 months
Smokers NR
Mean: 13.5 yrs
Baseline: 11/23
End: 32 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
Percent of sites with GI (L & S) >1
A: 17.41 ± 20.74
B: NA
C: 21.61 ± 24.93
Percent of sites with BT(A) >1:
A: 17.69 ± 21.77
B: NA
C: 22.70 ± 25.24
(18 months)
Percent of sites with GI (L & S) >1
A: 27.04 ± 24.69
B: NA
C: 53.46 ± 29.38
Percent of sites with BT (A) >1:
A: 24.52 ± 25.77
B: NA
C: 53.19 ± 30.49
GI (L & S)
A: 9.63 (55.31%)
B: NA
C: 31.85 (147.39%#)
BT (A)
A: 6.83 (38.61%)
B: NA
C: 30.49 (134.32%#)
When the percentage of sites with gingival index >1 was considered, the group that used H2O2 showed significantly lower percentage when compared to the placebo group
When the percentage of sites with bleeding tendency >1 was considered, the group that used H2O2 showed significantly lower percentage when compared to the placebo group

Clark, 1989, USA [19]
RCT (parallel)
Systemically healthy
Gingivitis (at least 8 sites with marginal gingival bleeding)
GI (L & S)
H2O2 1.5% (use of toothbrush and dentifrice NR)
Once a day (20 ml for 30 s) during 21 weeks
2 smokers
Mean age: 28.9 yrs
Baseline: 9/16
End: 22 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
NAWater (use of toothbrush and dentifrice NR)
Once a day (20 ml for 30 s) during 21 weeks
No smokers
Mean age 27.8 yrs
Baseline: 8/17
End: 22 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
A: 2.20 ± 0.35
B: NA
C: 2.31 ± 0.24
(6 months)
A: 1.62 ± 0.61
B: NA
C: 1.88 ± 0.50
A: −0.58 (−26.367%)
B: NA
C: −0.43 (−18.61%)
No statistically significant difference between groups
Gomes, 1984, USA [20]
RCT (parallel)
Nonhandicapped staff and handicapped patients—both of them were free of systemic diseases
Individuals without periodontitis (probing depth <5 mm)
GI (L & S)
H2O2 1.5% (use of toothbrush and dentifrice NR)
Three times per day (10 ml per 60 s) during 7 days
Staff: Smokers NR Mean age: 30.34 yrs
Baseline: 5/34
End: NR/NR
Patients: smokers NR
Mean age: 28.65 yrs
Baseline: 30/24
End: NR/NR
NAPlacebo mouth rinse (use of toothbrush and dentifrice NR)
Three times per day (10 ml per 60 s) during 7 days
Staff: Smokers NR Mean age: 29.94 yrs
Baseline: 5/30
End: NR/NR
Patients: Smokers NR
Mean age: 28.62 yrs
Baseline: 25/25
End: NR/NR
Staff—male
A: 1.28 ± 0.58
B: NA
C: 1.00 ± 0.12
Staff—female
A: 1.30 ± 0.46
B: NA
C: 0.89 ± 0.31
Patients—male
A: 1.37 ± 0.48
B: NA
C: 1.64 ± 0.63
Patients—female
A: 1.36 ± 0.48
B: NA
C: 1.31 ± 0.59
(7 days)
Staff—male
A: 0.73 ± 0.29
B: NA
C: 1.01 ± 0.32
Staff—female
A: 0.85 ± 0.41
B: NA
C: 0.86 ± 0.32
Patients—male
A: 1.19 ± 0.49
B: NA
C: 1.58 ± 0.58
Patients—female
A: 1.18 ± 0.42
B: NA
C: 1.25 ± 0.55
Staff—male
A: −0.55 (−42.97%#)
B: NA
C: 0.01 (1.00%)
Staff—female
A: −0.45 (−34.62%#)
B: NA
C: −0.03 (−3.37%)
Patients—male
A: −0.18 (−13.14%#)
B: NA
C: −0.06 (−3.66%)
Patients—female
A: −0.18 (−13.24%#)
B: NA
C: −0.06 (−4.58%)
In the within group comparison, a significantly lower plaque score was detected, for both staff and patient groups, only for H2O2

Hasturk, 2004; USA [11]
RCT (parallel)
Systemically healthy
Gingivitis (gingival index >2.0 and >10% sites with bleeding)
In the first 28 days, only the mouth rinses were used
EIBI; mGI (G) and BoP
H2O2 1.5% + 0.05 sodium fluoride toothpaste + toothbrush
Twice daily (quantity not reported for 30 s) during 6 months
3.9% smokers (N not provided)
Mean age: 31.4 yrs
Baseline: 19%/51% (N not provided)
End: NR/NR
NAPlacebo mouth rinse 0.05 sodium fluoride toothpaste + toothbrush
Twice daily (quantity not reported for 30 s) during 6 months
18.8% smokers (N not provided)
Mean age: 31.0 yrs
Baseline: 45.8%/54.2% (N not provided)
End: NR/NR
EIBI
A: 0.05 ± 0.14
B: NA
C: 0.04 ± 0.09
mGI (G)
A: 1.81 ± 0.41
B: NA
C: 1.79 ± 0.46
BoP
A: 0.12 ± 0.17
B: NA
C: 0.10 ± 0.12
(6 months)
EIBI
A: 0.02 ± NR
B: NA
C: 0.02 ± NR
mGI (G)
A: 1.63 ± NR
B: NA
C: 1.83 ± NR
BoP
A: 0.08 ± NR
B: NA
C: 0.10 ± NR
EIBI
A: −0.03 (−64.34%#)
B: NA
C: −0.02 (−38.42%#)
mGI (G)
A: −0.18 (−9.95%#)
B: NA
C: 0.04 (2.23%)
BoP
A: −0.02 (−20%)
B: NA
C: −0.02 (−16.81%)
The decrease in the H2O2 group was significant in comparison to change in the placebo group (P = 0.004) when considering the mGI (G)
No other statistically significant difference between groups was observed
Porwal, 2018, India [10]
RCT (parallel)
Systemically healthy
Gingivitis (modified gingival index of 3 and plaque index of 4)
mGI (L)
H2O2 3% with distilled water (ratio 1:1)
Twice daily (10 ml and time not reported) during 15 days
Smokers NR
Mean age: NR
Baseline: 10 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
End: 10 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
CHX 0.2% with distilled water (ratio 1:1)
Twice daily (10 ml and time not reported) during 15 days
Smokers NR
Mean age: NR
Baseline: 10 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
End: 10 individuals in total (proportion of M/F NR)
NAA: 2.92 ± 0.31
B: 3.04 ± 0.23
C: NA
(28 days)
A: 0.86 ± 0.11
B: 0.54 ± 0.35
C: NA
A: −2.06 (−70.55%#)
B: −2.50 (−82.24%#)
C: NA
No statistically significant difference between groups

Rashed, 2016, Saudi Arabia [12]
RCT (parallel)
Systemically healthy
Periodontitis (clinical attachment loss >4 mm in >30% of the sites)
GI (L & S)
H2O2 1.5% + scaling and root planing + mechanical oral hygiene
Twice daily (quantity and time not reported) during 10 days
No smokers
Age range: 30–50 yrs
Baseline: 15/0
End: 15/0
CHX 0.2% + scaling and root planing + mechanical oral hygiene
Twice daily (quantity and time not reported) during 10 days
No smokers
Age range: 30–50 yrs
Baseline: 15/0
End: 15/0
Scaling and root planing only + mechanical oral hygiene
Not applicable
No smokers
Age range: 30–50
Baseline: 15/0
End: 15/0
A: NR ± NR
B: NR ± NR
C: NR ± NR
(3 months)
A: NR ± NR
B: NR ± NR
C: NR ± NR
A: NR (NR#)
B: NR (NR#)
C: NR (NR#)
No statistically significant difference between CHX and H2O2 groups
Statistically significant lower gingival index in H2O2 in comparison to the control group

Sharma, 2019; India [21]
RCT (parallel)
Systemically healthy
Halitosis (patients with organoleptic score >1, in a scale of 0 to 5)
GI (L & S)
H2O2 1.5% (use of toothbrush and dentifrice NR)
Twice daily (10 ml and time not reported) during 15 days
No smokers
Mean age: 24.78 yrs (whole sample)
Baseline: NR/NR
End: NR/NR
CHX 2% (use of toothbrush and dentifrice NR)
Twice daily (10 ml and time not reported) during 15 days
No smokers
Mean age: 24.78 yrs (whole sample)
Baseline: NR/NR
End: NR/NR
NAA: 1.83 ± 0.35
B: 1.74 ± 0.17
C: NA
(15 days)
A: 1.80 ± 0.34
B: 1.66 ± 0.17
C: NA
A: −0.03 (−1.64%#)
B: −0.08 (−4.60%#)
C: NA
CHX group showed significantly lower gingival index scores in comparison to H2O2
Studies with experimental gingivitis
Gusberti, 1988, Switzerland [16]
Non-RCT (parallel)
Not reported
Not reported
GI (L & S)
H2O2 1%
Twice daily (15 ml for 30 s) during 21 days
Smokers NR
Mean age NR
Baseline: NR/NR
End: NR/NR
CHX 0.12%
Twice daily (15 ml for 30 s) during 21 days
Smokers NR
Mean age NR
Baseline: NR/NR
End: NR/NR
Flavored alcoholic placebo solution
Twice daily (15 ml for 30 s)
Smokers NR
Mean age NR
Baseline: NR/NR
End: NR/NR
A: 0.00 ± 0.00
B: 0.00 ± 0.00
C: 0.00 ± 0.00
(21 days)
A: 1.27 ± NR
B: 0.06 ± NR
C: 1.49 ± NR
A: 1.27
B: 0.06
C: 1.49
Statistically significant lower gingival index was detected in the CHX group when compared to both groups
Statistically significant lower gingival index was detected in the H2O2 group when compared to the placebo group

Wennström, 1979, Sweden [18]
Non-RCT (cross-over)
Systemically healthy
Oral health
GI (L & S)
H2O2 (1.7g dissolved in 30 ml of tap water)
Three times a day (30 ml per 2 minutes) during 14 days
Smokers NR
Mean age NR
Baseline: NR/NR (total n = 14)
End: NR/NR (total n = 14)
NAPlacebo mouthwash
Three times a day (30 ml per 2 minutes) during 14 days
Smokers NR
Mean age NR
Baseline: NR/NR (total n = 14);
End: NR/NR (total n = 14)
Percent of sites with score 0
A: 72.10 ± 1.80
B: NA
C: 74.00 ± 2.30
Percent of sites with score 1
A: 26.4 ± 1.70
B: NA
C: 25.4 ± 2.20
Percent of sites with score 2
A: 1.50 ± 0.60
B: NA
C: 0.60 ± 0.30
Percent of sites with score 3
A: 0.00 ± 0.00
B: NA
C: 0.00 ± 0.00
(14 days)
Percent of sites with score 0
A: 27.40 ± 7.30
B: NA
C: 13.00 ± 2.30
Percent of sites with score 1
A: 53.30 ± 1.40
B: NA
C: 54.90 ± 3.40
Percent of sites with score 2
A: 19.40 ± 2.40
B: NA
C: 31.60 ± 4.60
Percent of sites with score 3
A: 0.00 ± 0.00
B: NA
C: 0.00 ± 0.00
Sites with score 0
A: −44.70 (−62.00%)
B: NA
C: −61.00 (−82.43%)
Sites with score 1
A: 26.90 (101.89%)
B: NA
C: 29.50 (116.14%)
Sites with score 2
A: 17.9 (1.193%)
B: NA
C: 31 (5,166%)
Sites with score 3
A: 0 (0%)
B: NA
C: 0 (0%)
Significantly higher percentage of score 0 was detected in the H2O2 group in comparison to the control group
Significantly a lower percentage of score 1 was detected in the H2O2 group in comparison to the control group
Significantly a lower percentage of score 2 was detected in the H2O2 group in comparison to the control group
No statistically significant difference was detected between groups for percentage of score 3

NA: not applicable; NR: not reported; RCT: randomized clinical trial; non-RCT: nonrandomized clinical trial; CHX: chlorhexidine; M: male; F: female. A: H2O2 rinse; B: chlorhexidine rinse; C: control rinse. ∆: delta of mean (final−initial mean); %: percentage of reduction. GI (L & S): gingival index (Löe & Silness, 1963); BT (A): bleeding tendency (Armitage et al., 1982); EIBI: Eastman interdental bleeding index; mGI (G); modified gingival index (Gordon et al., 1985); BoP: bleeding on probing; mGI (L): modified gingival index (Lobene et al., 1989). Statistically significant differences between groups (H2O2 vs chlorhexidine); statistically significant differences between groups (H2O2 vs control); #statistically significant differences within group (end vs baseline score).