Perception of Smile Aesthetics of Patients with Anterior Malocclusions and Lips Influence: A Comparison of Dental Professionals’, Dental Students,’ and Laypersons’ Opinions

Table 3

Differences among groups in the perception of attractiveness of anterior crowding with and without the lips.

Group	I	II	III	IV	V	VI
(a) Mild crowding without the lips
I
II	0.434
III	0.381	0.460
IV	0.392	0.617	0.912
V	0.032	0.550	0.141	0.239
VI	0.001	0.120	0.009	0.027	0.381
(b) Mild crowding with the lips
I
II	0.004
III	0.001	0.166
IV	0.026	0.317	0.044
V	0.012	0.782	0.397	0.340
VI	0.0001	0.171	0.819	0.039	0.446
(c) Moderate crowding without the lips
I
II	0.533
III	0.542	0.944
IV	0.918	0.419	0.445
V	0.918	0.419	0.445	1.000
VI	0.409	0.945	0.885	0.308	0.308
(d) Moderate crowding with the lips
I
II	0.574
III	0.535	0.844
IV	0.888	0.421	0.396
V	0.242	0.534	0.756	0.133
VI	0.016	0.057	0.156	0.004	0.209
(e) Severe crowding without the lips
I
II	0.077
III	0.077	1.000
IV	0.077	1.000	1.000
V	0.077	1.000	1.000	1.000
VI	0.660	0.125	0.125	0.125	0.125
(f) Severe crowding with the lips
I
II	0.723
III	0.525	0.293
IV	0.934	0.655	0.540
V	0.934	0.615	0.556	0.967
VI	0.037	0.062	0.006	0.025	0.018