Perception of Smile Aesthetics of Patients with Anterior Malocclusions and Lips Influence: A Comparison of Dental Professionals’, Dental Students,’ and Laypersons’ Opinions

Table 4

Differences among groups in the perception of attractiveness of anterior spacing with and without the lips.

Group	I	II	III	IV	V	VI
(a) Mild spacing without the lips
I
II	0.554
III	0.554	0.137
IV	0.786	0.652	0.408
V	0.554	0.137	1.000	0.408
VI	0.517	0.910	0.192	0.775	0.192
(b) Mild spacing with the lips
I
II	0.958
III	0.656	0.671
IV	0.575	0.533	0.282
V	0.891	0.915	0.705	0.441
VI	0.042	0.031	0.005	0.184	0.013
(c) Moderate spacing without the lips
I
II	0.958
III	0.656	0.671
IV	0.575	0.533	0.282
V	0.891	0.915	0.705	0.441
VI	0.042	0.031	0.005	0.184	0.013
VI	0.532	0.203	0.032	0.119	0.098
(d) Moderate spacing with the lips
I
II	0.068
III	0.477	0.226
IV	0.421	0.327	0.874
V	0.685	0.16	0.783	0.689
VI	0.006	0.274	0.023	0.043	0.017
(e) Severe spacing without the lips
I
II	0.671
III	0.087	0.241
IV	0.022	0.103	0.610
V	0.002	0.012	0.139	0.312
VI	0.656	0.896	0.108	0.028	0.001
(f) Severe spacing with the lips
I
II	0.914
III	0.914	1.000
IV	0.345	0.387	0.387
V	0.231	9.192	0.192	0.859
VI	0.903	0.943	0.943	0.285	0.131