Research Article

Comparing the Dimensional Accuracy of Casts Obtained from Two Types of Silicone Impression Materials in Different Impression Techniques and Frequent Times of Cast Preparation

Table 2

The mean dimensional accuracy measured based on different impression methods (one-stage or two-stage) and different times of impression preparation (1 h, 24 h, and 14 days after impression).

Dimensional accuracy measurement timeImpression methodSmall die diameter (SD ± mean)Die height (SD ± mean)Distance between the inner vertices of the dies (SD ± mean)

Dimensional accuracy measured after one hourS10.14 ± 13.760.12 ± 14.040.32 ± 46.99
S20.12 ± 13.410.33 14.09±0.29 47.26±
P10.09 ± 13.820.07 ± 13.950.15 ± 46.93
P20.17 ± 13.270.18 ± 14.110.19 ± 47.43

Dimensional accuracy measured after a dayS10.12 ± 13.870.21 ± 14.130.09 ± 46.87
S20.15 ± 13.430.13 ± 14.000.35 ± 47.300
P10.10 ± 13.830.06 ± 14.020.07 ± 47.02
P20.21 ± 13.190.53 ± 13.680.20 ± 47.57

Dimensional accuracy measured after two weeksS10.17 ± 13.850.19 ± 13.960.43 ± 46.93
S20.23 ± 13.500.23 ± 13.970.27 ± 47.10
P10.07 ± 13.770.12 ± 13.940.10 ± 47.01
P20.20 ± 13.160.17 ± 13.970.21 ± 47.59

Small die diameter size on the model: 13.72 mm; die height size on the model: 14.00 mm; distance between the inner vertices of the dies size on the model: 47.00 mm. SD, standard deviation; S1, Speedex one-stage technique; P1, Panasil one-stage technique; S2, Speedex two-stage technique; P2, Panasil two-stage technique.