Review Article

Evaluation of Electromyographic Activity of Masticatory Muscles in Adults with Posterior Crossbite

Table 4

Quality evaluation of the selected studies.

Author/yearStudy designSample sizeSelection descriptionValid measurement methodsBlinding in measurementsMethod error analysisAdequate statistics providedConfounding factorsJudged quality standard

Dong et al. [15], 2008Cross-sectional studies with control groupNoAdequateAdequateNoNoAdequateNoMedium (6)
Moreno et al. [18], 2008Observational studyNoAdequateAdequateNoNoAdequateNoLow (4)
Saifuddin et al. [16], 2003Cross-sectional studies with control groupNoAdequateAdequateNoNoAdequateNoMedium (6)
Sverzut et al. [40], 2011Quasiexperimental clinical trialNoAdequateAdequateNoNoAdequateNoMedium (6)
Takeshita et al. [41], 2013Case reportNoInadequateInadequateNoNoNot relatedNoLow (1)
Tecco et al. [7], 2010Cross-sectional studies with control groupNoAdequateAdequateNoYesAdequateNoMedium (7)
Woźniak [17], 2015Cross-sectional studies with control groupNoAdequateAdequateNoNoAdequateNoMedium (6)
Yamasaki et al. [42], 2015Observational studyNoInadequateAdequateNoYesAdequateNoLow (4)

Quality evaluation, according to Andrade et al. [20].