Review Article
Evaluation of Electromyographic Activity of Masticatory Muscles in Adults with Posterior Crossbite
Table 4
Quality evaluation of the selected studies.
| Author/year | Study design | Sample size | Selection description | Valid measurement methods | Blinding in measurements | Method error analysis | Adequate statistics provided | Confounding factors | Judged quality standard |
| Dong et al. [15], 2008 | Cross-sectional studies with control group | No | Adequate | Adequate | No | No | Adequate | No | Medium (6) | Moreno et al. [18], 2008 | Observational study | No | Adequate | Adequate | No | No | Adequate | No | Low (4) | Saifuddin et al. [16], 2003 | Cross-sectional studies with control group | No | Adequate | Adequate | No | No | Adequate | No | Medium (6) | Sverzut et al. [40], 2011 | Quasiexperimental clinical trial | No | Adequate | Adequate | No | No | Adequate | No | Medium (6) | Takeshita et al. [41], 2013 | Case report | No | Inadequate | Inadequate | No | No | Not related | No | Low (1) | Tecco et al. [7], 2010 | Cross-sectional studies with control group | No | Adequate | Adequate | No | Yes | Adequate | No | Medium (7) | Woźniak [17], 2015 | Cross-sectional studies with control group | No | Adequate | Adequate | No | No | Adequate | No | Medium (6) | Yamasaki et al. [42], 2015 | Observational study | No | Inadequate | Adequate | No | Yes | Adequate | No | Low (4) |
|
|
Quality evaluation, according to Andrade et al. [ 20]. |