Review Article
Evaluation of Electromyographic Activity of Masticatory Muscles in Adults with Posterior Crossbite
Table 5
JBI critical appraisal tool results for analytical cross-sectional studies.
| | Were the criteria for inclusion in the sample clearly defined? | Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail? | Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way? | Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition? | Were confounding factors identified? | Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated? | Were the outcomes measured in valid and reliable way? | Was appropriate statistical analysis used? | % of “yes” scores | Risk of bias |
| Dong et al. [15], 2008 | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | 37% | High | Moreno et al. [18], 2008 | No | No | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | 50% | Moderate | Saifuddin et al. [16], 2003 | Yes | Unclear | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | 62% | Moderate | Tecco et al. [7], 2010 | Yes | Yes | Yes | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | Yes | 62% | Moderate | Woźniak [17], 2015 | Yes | Yes | Unclear | No | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | 37% | High | Yamasaki et al. [42], 2015 | Yes | No | Yes | No | Unclear | Unclear | Unclear | Yes | 37% | High |
|
|