Review Article

Unsplinted Attachments and Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in 2-Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Excluded studies with reasons.

Sr. no.AuthorsYearReason for exclusion

1Patil et al. [18]2020Only Locator attachments compared
2Burns et al. [19]2011Compared directly with splinted attachments
3Zygogiannis et al. [20]2018Compared directly with splinted attachments
4Schincaglia et al. [21]2016No patient-related outcome
5Scala et al. [22]2012Not involving 2-implant-retained overdentures
6De Kok et al. [23]2011Compared directly with implant-supported fixed prosthesis
7Akoglu et al. [24]2011Only ball attachments compared
8Büttel et al. [25]2012Study type not RCT
9Sun et al. [26]2014Not standardized attachments used
10Ribeiro et al. [27]2015No patient-related outcome
11Bryant et al. [28]2014Only ball attachments compared
12Salman et al. [29]2019Only Locator attachments compared
13Della Vecchia et al. [30]2017No patient-related outcome
14Uçankale et al. [31]2010Compared directly with splinted attachments
15Grandi et al. [32]2012Study type not RCT
16Elsyad et al. [33]2013Compared directly with splinted attachments
17Schuster et al. [34]2020Only Equator attachments compared
18Giannakopoulos et al. [35]2017Only Locator attachments compared
19Kappel et al. [36]2016Compared directly with splinted attachments
20Geckili et al. [37]2010Only Locator attachments compared
21Hasan et al. [38]2016Not involving 2-implant-retained overdentures
22Pan et al. [39]2010Only ball attachments compared