Procedure Time and Students’ Perception Comparing Full Arch Digital Scans with Conventional Impressions: A Cross-Over Randomized Experimental Trial

<table class="table-group" id="tab1"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left">Inclusion criteria</td><td class="align_center">Exclusion criteria</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="2"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">(i) All male and female dental students enrolled in the 2020–2021 preclinical fixed prosthodontics course<br/>(ii) Students with no previous experience with both digital and conventional impression techniques</td><td class="align_left">(i) Students who dropped from the course<br/>(ii) Unwilling to participate in this study</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="2"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Participants’ inclusion and exclusion criteria.</div>

International Journal of Dentistry

tab1

Table 1

Table 1: Procedure Time and Students’ Perception Comparing Full Arch Digital Scans with Conventional Impressions: A Cross-Over Randomized Experimental Trial 

Table 1 | Procedure Time and Students’ Perception Comparing Full Arch Digital Scans with Conventional Impressions: A Cross-Over Randomized Experimental Trial 