Research Article
Efficacy of a Novel Bioactive Glass-Polymer Composite for Enamel Remineralization following Erosive Challenge
Table 3
Means and standard deviation of microhardness values for each group (at sound, demineralized, and remineralized stages).
| | Groups | Stages | N | Mean | Std. deviation |
| | 52S4/UPGO | Sounda | 15 | 343.33 | 12.82 | | Demineralizedb | 15 | 97.20 | 7.76 | | Remineralizedc | 15 | 224.20 | 12.43 |
| | FluoroDose® | Sounda | 15 | 355.20 | 37.11 | | Demineralizedb | 15 | 113.80 | 35.49 | | Remineralizedd | 15 | 174.33 | 35.78 |
| | GC tooth mousse | Sounda | 15 | 343.00 | 33.51 | | Demineralizedb | 15 | 115.73 | 40.77 | | Remineralizedd | 15 | 182.53 | 37.34 |
|
|
Different lower-case letters show statistical difference. |