Research Article
Novel PEEK Retentive Elements versus Conventional Retentive Elements in Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Table 1
Comparison between retention forces (N) in the two groups.
| | PEEK | Ball | value | C.I 95% | Effect size (partial eta squared) | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| Zero | 37.6A | 0.992 | 17.79A | 0.488 | 0.001 | 20.5053–19.1147 | 0.968 | 3 | 33.9B | 0.917 | 16.781B | 0.481 | 0.001 | 17.8203–16.5177 | 0.950 | 6 | 32.7C | 1.015 | 15.972C | 0.763 | 0.001 | −17.5266–15.9294 | 0.523 | 12 | 31.65D | 1.166 | 13.054D | 0.643 | 0.001 | −19.4335–17.7585 | 0.876 | Effect size (partial eta squared) | 0.979 | 0.968 | | | |
|
|
Significant at , different superscripts (A, B, C, & D) in the same column are statistically significantly different. |