Research Article
Novel PEEK Retentive Elements versus Conventional Retentive Elements in Mandibular Overdentures: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Table 2
Comparison between overall satisfaction in the two groups.
| | PEEK | Ball | value | C.I 95% | Effect size (partial eta squared) | Mean | SD | Mean | SD |
| Zero | 65A | 5.916 | 82.18 | 4.833 | 0.001 | 12.3754/21.9846 | 0.645 | 3 | 87.81B | 3.945 | 84.72A | 3.495 | 0.0660 | −7.7824/−0.2016 | 0.015 | 6 | 86.36B | 5.045 | 80.18 | 6.096 | 0.0175 | −11.1567/−1.2033 | 0.083 | 12 | 85.45B | 5.222 | 79.54B | 5.007 | 0.0135 | −10.4601/−1.3599 | 0.623 | Effect size (partial eta squared) | 0.821 | 0.783 | | | |
|
|
Significant at , different superscripts in the same column (A & B) are statistically significantly different. |