Research Article
Evaluation of Infection and Effective Factors in Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Surgeries: A Cross-Sectional Study
Table 1
Association between the predictor variables and the outcome variables.
| Variables | Postoperative infection | No postoperative infection | value |
| Total | | 5 | 143 | | Age | | 25 ± 1.20 | 25 ± 1.35 | 0.996 |
| Gender | Male | 1 | 54 | 0.651 | Female | 4 | 89 | |
| Position of tooth | Right | 3 | 89 | >0.999 | Left | 2 | 54 | |
| Distal space | I | 0 | 54 | 0.096 | II | 3 | 71 | | III | 2 | 18 | |
| Depth of impaction | A | 0 | 28 | 0.087 | B | 1 | 68 | | C | 4 | 47 | |
| Angulation | Horizontal | 2 | 45 | 0.763 | Vertical | 3 | 71 | | Distoangular | 0 | 4 | | Mesioangular | 0 | 23 | |
| Pederson difficulty index | Easy (3–4) | 0 | 16 | 0.013 | Medium (5–7) | 1 | 95 | | Hard (8–10) | 4 | 32 | |
| Periapical radiolucent lesions | Presence | 1 | 21 | 0.558 | Absence | 4 | 122 | |
| Adjacent second molar caries | Presence | 1 | 45 | 0.782 | Absence | 4 | 94 | | No adjacent tooth | 0 | 4 | |
| Surgeon’s education level | 1st year resident | 3 | 19 | 0.028 | 2nd year resident | 2 | 69 | | 3rd year resident | 0 | 41 | | Maxillofacial surgeon | 0 | 14 | |
| Type of flap | Envelope | 5 | 115 | 0.584 | Triangular | 0 | 28 | |
| Type of suture | Nonabsorbable | 5 | 121 | >0.999 | Absorbable | 0 | 22 | |
|
|
Statistically significant. |