Research Article
Comparative Evaluation of the Effect of Implant Crown Materials on Implant Components and Bone Stress Distribution: A 3D Finite Element Analysis
Table 1
Properties of used material.
| Material | Young modulus (GPa) | Poisson’s ratio | Reference |
| Cortical bone | 13.7 | 0.30 | [29] | Cancellous bone | 1.37 | 0.30 | [29] | Titanium implant | 117 | 0.33 | [30] | Titanium abutment | 117 | 0.33 | [30] | Zirconia (Lava; 3M ESPE) | 210 | 0.3 | [31] | Lithium disilicate (Vita Suprinity) | 65.6 | 0.23 | [32] | Zirconia lithium silicate (Celtra Duo) | 61 | 0.30 | [33] | Dual polymerized resin cement | 18.6 | 0.28 | [34] | Metal alloy (Cr Co) | 220 | 0.30 | [35] | Feldspathic porcelain | 48.7 | 0.23 | [35] |
|
|