Research Article
Effect of Wet and Dry Finishing and Polishing Technique on Microhardness and Flexural Strength of Nanocomposite Resins
Table 2
Mean ± SD, minimum, median, and maximum values of flexural strength of the samples.
| Materials | Groups | Mean ± SD | Minimum | Median | Maximum |
| Z250 | WT0 | 100.93 ± 12.22 | 82.32 | 100.66 | 112.60 | DT0 | 109.09 ± 10.74 | 92.31 | 110.95 | 119.25 | WT24 | 124.79 ± 19.52 | 93.44 | 128.35 | 141.65 | DT24 | 135.19 ± 18.68 | 111.86 | 136.46 | 158.50 |
| Z350 XT | WT0 | 94.20 ± 4.63 | 87.80 | 94.42 | 98.93 | DT0 | 111.96 ± 10.57 | 98.48 | 116.47 | 122.69 | WT24 | 98.38 ± 22.30 | 64.41 | 95.72 | 122.12 | DT24 | 106.17 ± 24.96 | 77.98 | 109.78 | 130.41 |
| Z550 | WT0 | 108.17 ± 13.89 | 90.72 | 107.96 | 128.12 | DT0 | 115.17 ± 16.04 | 88.08 | 120.56 | 129.34 | WT24 | 111.72 ± 18.69 | 87.90 | 119.81 | 129.26 | DT24 | 114.72 ± 22.97 | 76.12 | 118.98 | 134.71 |
|
|
W0: wet polishing at time 0, D0: dry polishing at time 0, W24: wet polishing after 24 hours, D24: dry polishing after 24 hours.
|