Research Article

Effect of Wet and Dry Finishing and Polishing Technique on Microhardness and Flexural Strength of Nanocomposite Resins

Table 3

Mean ± standard deviation (SD) values and result of comparison of flexural strength in three different composites in different polishing statuses (dry and wet) and times (0 and 24 hours after).

MaterialsZ250Z350XTZ550

WT0100.93 ± 12.22Aa94.20 ± 4.63Aa108.17 ± 13.89Aa
DT0109.09 ± 10.74Aa111.96 ± 10.57Aa115.17 ± 16.04Aa
WT24124.79 ± 19.52Bb98.38 ± 22.30Ab111.72 ± 18.69Ab
DT24135.19 ± 18.68Bb106.17 ± 24.96Aa114.72 ± 22.97Ab

W0: wet polishing at time 0; D0: dry polishing at time 0; W24: wet polishing after 24 hours; D24: dry polishing after 24 hours. Means followed by different lowercase letters show statistically significant differences between them, as compared in rows. Means followed by the same uppercase letters do not show statistically significant differences between them, as compared in columns.