Research Article

Evaluation of One- and Two-Step Impression Techniques and Vertical Marginal Misfit in Fixed Prothesis

Table 1

The independent t-test results of the vertical marginal misfit comparing each surface between one-step and two-step techniques.

GroupMean (μm)Std. deviation value

Mesial of 2nd premolar, one-step technique137.812532.37160.001
Mesial of 2nd premolar, two-step technique93.5718.427
Buccal of 2nd premolar, one-step technique123.84519.1410.001
Buccal of 2nd premolar, two-step technique96.00517.597
Lingual of 2nd premolar, one-step technique141.46844.5710.019
Lingual of 2nd premolar, two-step technique102.39429.929
Buccal of 2nd molar, one-step technique123.03513.2740.003
Buccal of 2nd molar, two-step technique101.5718.268
Distal of 2nd molar, one-step technique119.94524.7680.0167
Distal of 2nd molar, two-step technique98.96713.233
Lingual of 2nd molar, one-step technique112.1622.5050.009
Lingual of 2nd molar, two-step technique82.43628.526