Research Article

Students’ Perspective on Undergraduate Research Experiences in Indonesian Dental Schools

Table 3

Indonesian dental students’ perception on the experiences of UG research.

Statements on undergraduate (UG) researchLikert score
Strongly disagreeDisagreeAgreeStrongly agreeDomain mean ± SD

A. Preference domain1.86 ± 0.75
 1. UG research is not important for academic dental education71 (34.98%)106 (52.22%)19 (9.36%)7 (3.45%)
 2. UG research preferably not included as compulsory course in dental curriculum61 (30.05%)104 (51.23%)32 (15.76%)6 (2.96%)
B. Learning experiences domain3.18 ± 0.56
 3. UG research improved my problem solving skills2 (0.99%)10 (4.93%)140 (68.97%)51 (25.12%)
 4. UG research taught me to think independently2 (0.99%)4 (1.97%)149 (73.40%)48 (23.65%)
 5. UG research improved critical thinking skills2 (0.99%)6 (2.96%)135 (66.50%)60 (29.56%)
 6. Improve my ability to deliver presentation in seminars1 (0.49%)18 (8.87%)136 (67.00%)48 (23.65%)
 7. UG research thought me the relation of research and clinical practice3 (1.48%)15 (7.39%)138 (67.98%)47 (23.15%)
C. Learning satisfaction domain2.73 ± 0.80
 8. UG research experience during my academic study was not satisfactory52 (25.62%)120 (59.11%)27 (13.30%)4 (1.97%)
 9. UG research experience quite satisfactory3 (1.48%)16 (7.88%)160 (78.82%)24 (11.82%)
 10. UG research experience was supported by adequate research facilities11 (5.42%)41 (20.20%)128 (63.05%)23 (11.33%)
 11. UG research experience have adequate supports from supervisors5 (2.46%)14 (6.90%)125 (61.58%)59 (29.06%)