Research Article

Occlusal Features and Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: A Cross-Sectional Study

Table 4

The number, percentage, Chi-square, and level of significance of TMD parameter occurrence in different posterior crossbites.

Posterior crossbiteMuscle painTMJ painClickingChi-squareSignificance
Present (N = 8)Absent (N = 10)Present (N = 12)Absent (N = 6)Present (N = 13)Absent (N = 5)

Buccal posterior crossbite (BPCB) N = 18
 Unilateral (N = 12)
  With shift (N = 8)2 (25%)6 (60%)5 (42%)3 (50%)5 (39%)3 (60%)30.223 (NS)
  Without shift (N = 4)0 (0%4 (40%)0 (0%)4 (67%)1 (8%)3 (60%)0.223 (NS)0.336 (NS)
 Bilateral (N = 6)
  With shift (N = 1)1 (13%)0 (0%)1 (8%)0 (0%)1 (8%)0 (0%)N/AN/A
  Without shift (N = 5)0 (0%)5 (50%)0 (0%)5 (83%)0 (0%)5 (100%)N/AN/A
Lingual posterior crossbite (LPCB) (N = 4)
 Unilateral (N = 1)
  With shift (N = 0)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)N/AN/A
  Without shift (N = 1)1 (13%)0 (0%)1 (8%)0 (0%)1(8%)0 (0%)N/AN/A
 Bilateral (N = 3)
  With shift (N = 0)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)0 (0%)N/AN/A
  Without shift (N = 3)1 (13%)2 (20%)1 (8%)2 (33%)1(8%)2 (40%)N/AN/A
Correlation0.2550.1230.243
Significance

NS, nonsignificance at . weak positive correlation (R < 0.3). N/A, nonapplicable due to small sample size.