Assessment of the Quality Characteristics of Stropharia rugosoannulata Subjected to Five Different Drying Methods

Table 4

Mineral analysis of S. rugosoannulata dehydrated by different drying methods.

Elements mg/kg d.m.	Drying methods
	SD	RSD	HD	VFD	MD
Fe	^cd	^bc	^a	^d	^ab
Mn	^b	^a	^a	^ab	^ab
Zn
Cu	^ab	^ab	^a	^b	^ab
Se	^bc	^ab	^a	^c	^ab
Na^#	^c	^d	^a	^e	^b
K^#	^c	^d	^a	^e	^b
Ca^#	^ab	^ab	^a	^b	^a
P^#	^b	^a	^c	^bc	^bc
Mg^#	^bc	^c	^a	^d	^b

Notes: results were expressed as (). “d.m.” represented dry matter. Microelement. ^#Macroelement. “Fe” represented iron. “Mn” represented manganese. “Zn” represented zinc. “Cu” represented copper. “Se” represented selenium. “Na” represented natrium. “K” represented potassium. “Ca” represented calcium. “P” represented phosphorus. “Mg” represented magnesium. Different letters in the same row indicated significant differences at .