Assessment of the Quality Characteristics of Stropharia rugosoannulata Subjected to Five Different Drying Methods
Table 5
Vitamin analysis of S. rugosoannulata dehydrated by different drying methods.
Vitamins
Drying methods
SD
RSD
HD
VFD
MD
Vitamin A
ND (<10)
ND (<10)
ND (<10)
ND (<10)
ND (<10)
Vitamin C
ND (<0.5)
ND (<0.5)
ND (<0.5)
Vitamin D
ND (<0.7)
ND (<0.7)
ND (<0.7)
ND (<0.7)
ND (<0.7)
Vitamin E
ND (<0.04)
ND (<0.04)
ND (<0.04)
ND (<0.04)
ND (<0.04)
Vitamin K1
ND (<1.5)
ND (<1.5)
ND (<1.5)
ND (<1.5)
ND (<1.5)
Vitamin B1
ND (<0.03)
ND (<0.03)
ND (<0.03)
ND (<0.03)
ND (<0.03)
Vitamin B2
a
b
a
ab
ab
Vitamin B5
b
b
ab
c
a
Vitamin B6
Vitamin B12
ab
d
a
bc
cd
Folic acid
c
a
ab
d
bc
Nicotinic acid
b
a
ab
b
b
Notes: results were expressed as (). “ND” represented it was not detected. μg/100 g dry matter. mg/100 g dry matter. Different letters in the same row indicated significant differences at .
