A Simple-to-Use Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Early Death Risk in Elderly Patients with Spinal Tumors: A Population-Based Study

Huang, Zhangheng; Zhao, Zhen; Liu, Yuheng; Zhou, Zhigang; Zhang, Weifei; Kong, Qingquan; He, Yaozhi

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2805786

Journal of Oncology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Abbreviations Data Availability Consent Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 2805786 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2805786

A Simple-to-Use Nomogram for Predicting Postoperative Early Death Risk in Elderly Patients with Spinal Tumors: A Population-Based Study

Zhangheng Huang,¹Zhen Zhao,¹Yuheng Liu,¹Zhigang Zhou,^1,2Weifei Zhang,¹Qingquan Kong,¹and Yaozhi He³

Academic Editor: Faisal Raza

Received03 Nov 2022

Revised13 Feb 2023

Accepted20 Feb 2023

Published04 Mar 2023

Abstract

Background. For elderly patients with primary spinal tumors, surgery is the best option for many elderly patients, in addition to palliative care. However, due to the unique physical function of elderly patients, the short-term prognosis is often unpredictable. It is therefore essential to develop a novel nomogram as a clinical aid to predict the risk of early death for elderly patients with primary spinal tumors who undergo surgery. Materials and Methods. In this study, clinical data were obtained from 651 patients through the SEER database, and they were retrospectively analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were used for risk-factor screening. Predictive modeling was performed through the R language. The prediction models were calibrated as well as evaluated for accuracy in the validation cohort. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and the decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the functionality of the nomogram. Results. We identified four separate risk factors for constructing nomograms. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (training set 0.815, validation set 0.815) shows that the nomogram has good discrimination ability. The decision curve analysis demonstrates the clinical use of this nomogram. The calibration curve indicates that this nomogram has high accuracy. At the same time, we have also developed a web version of the online nomogram for clinical practitioners to apply. Conclusions. We have successfully developed a nomogram that can accurately predict the risk of early death of elderly patients with primary spinal tumors undergoing surgery, which can provide a reference for clinicians.

1. Introduction

Primary malignant tumors of the spine have an extremely low incidence as a rare bone malignancy. It accounts for approximately 5% of bone tumors and less than 0.2% of all malignant tumors [1, 2]. Osteosarcoma, chondrosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, and chordoma are the most common primary malignant tumors of the spine, accounting for approximately 35%, 30%, 16%, and 8.4%, respectively [1, 3]. Although the cause of some of these tumors is unclear (e.g., Ewing’s sarcoma), neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment with surgical resection has been adopted as the treatment of choice in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines and has been shown to have a 5-year survival rate of 66.6% [4]. However, due to the rarity of primary malignancies of the spine, studies have been conducted in almost all age groups. The elderly, as a population with a high prevalence of malignancy, have a higher risk of complications and a poorer prognosis after surgery due to deterioration in physical function and other underlying diseases [5, 6]. How to improve the prognosis of elderly patients with spinal malignancies after undergoing surgery is a challenge for clinical practitioners.

Nomograms are predictive models widely used by clinicians and have been applied to predict the prognosis of many types of cancer [7–10]. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database contains basic data on 28% of the US cancer patients, providing adequate and reliable sample for this study. Early death was considered to be death within six months of the initial surgery, and this definition has also been applied in other studies [11, 12]. To predict the early death in elderly patients with primary spinal tumors undergoing surgery, this nomogram was successfully constructed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Patients and Data Collection

Patient data from the retrospective study came from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER) database, which covers cancer information for 28 percent of the total US population [13]. Because our study is retrospective and does not involve patient’s personally identifiable information, ethical approval and patient consent are not required. We extracted clinical pathological data and demographic data from patients including age, race, sex, tumor grade, tumor stage, tumor histology, marital status, radiotherapy, chemotherapy status, and year of diagnosis.

The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the primary site was the spine, (2) a diagnosis of malignancy was made, and (3) the patient who was 60 years of age or older. Finally, 651 elderly patients diagnosed with primary malignant spinal tumors between 1975 and 2015 were included.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The total information entries are randomly divided into a training cohort and a validation cohort at a ratio of 7 to 3 by using R software. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to screen out variables in the training cohort that might affect the prognosis of elderly patients with primary spinal tumors undergoing surgery, and then, the above variables were screened again using multivariate logistic regression analysis to exclude confounding effects between different factors. Based on the risk factors screened by multivariate logistic regression analysis, we used R software to construct a nomogram. Using R software, the training cohort and the validation cohort are used to plot the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the area under the curve (AUC) is closer to 1, indicating that the performance of this nomogram is better. Nomogram was evaluated for clinical efficacy using decision curve analysis (DCA). Calibration curves are used to assess the accuracy of predictions. All statistical analysis and charting were carried out by using SPSS (25.0) and R software version 4.0.3. The value <0.05 is set to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Demographic Characteristics

Based on the inclusion criteria, a total of 651 elderly patients were included in this study. By the R software, all patients were randomized into a training cohort and a validation cohort in a 7 : 3 ratio. Detailed demographic and clinicopathological information of the above patients is presented in Table 1.

3.2. Associated Risk Factors

After univariate logistic regression analysis, age, tumor grade, tumor histology, and tumor stage became risk factors. Subsequently, the above variables were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression, and after removing the mixed factors between variables, it was determined that age, tumor grade, tumor histology, and tumor stage were all independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of elderly patients with primary spinal tumors who underwent surgery (Table 2).

3.3. Construction of Nomograms

Nomograms that can predict the risk of early death in elderly patients with primary spinal tumors undergoing surgery are constructed based on four independent risk factors derived from the logistic regression analysis. The risk factors of the patients were corresponding to each point of the horizontal axis, and the relevant risk factors were scored separately. The prognostic prediction of the patient is obtained by adding the individual scores together to obtain a total score corresponding to the total score axis. We upload the nomograms that we have made and validated to the Internet so that they can be more easily used by more clinicians. The URL is https://hzhspine.shinyapps.io/hzhspine/ (Figure 1).

3.4. Evaluation of the Utility of Nomograms

We evaluated this nomogram using the ROC curve and the DCA. The AUC of the ROC curve of the training and validation cohorts was 0.815 and 0.815, respectively, showing that the model had good differentiation (Figure 2). On the other hand, the correction curves of both the training and validation cohorts obtained an ideal curve close to 45°, demonstrating that the prediction tool has some accuracy (Figure 3). Decision-curve analysis shows that the nomogram can achieve an average good yield for patients under a certain risk threshold, which supports the clinical utility of this nomogram (Figure 4). Finally, we risk-stratified the cohort. The results of Kaplan–Meier test demonstrated significant variability between the different risk strata (Figure 5).

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

Due to the rarity of primary spinal tumors, treatment strategies have only been progressively refined over the past two decades [14]. Even less attention has been paid to elderly patients. In the absence of relevant experience, reducing the risk of early death of elderly patients undergoing surgery for primary tumors of the spine is a major challenge for clinicians. Therefore, the development of a nomogram to predict the risk of early death of these elderly patients is of great clinical relevance. In this study, tumor grade, tumor stage, histological type of tumor, and patient’s age were found to be statistically significant indicators that had a significant impact on patients’ short-term prognosis. We can enter the above information for different individual patients into the nomogram to obtain an evaluation. It helps to take appropriate clinical measures according to patients’ different risks of early death to improve prognosis.

It has been established that the occurrence of primary malignancies of the spine is significantly correlated with age, and that cancer mortality increases dramatically with age from the age of 65 years [15, 16]. This generally accepted view was also confirmed in the present study. In addition to the accumulation of exposure to predisposing factors, we believe that it is also related to the prevalence of underlying diseases in the elderly. The accumulation of these carcinogenic factors and the presence of underlying disease make the elderly less tolerant of adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy, surgery, and postsurgical rehabilitation and also have a greater likelihood of tumor metastasis [17].

In addition to age, logistic regression analysis showed that tumor grade, tumor stage, and histological type of tumor are also key factors. The prognosis of survival in patients with primary tumors of the spine has been well-documented to correlate with these factors, and many authors have constructed related nomograms [10, 18–26]. In our previous studies, we have shown that tumor grade, tumor stage, and histological type of tumor are the key factors influencing postoperative OS in patients with primary spinal tumors, which is consistent with the results of this study [25]. However, almost all existing studies focus on all age groups, and no investigator has yet explored elderly patients as a study group.

Although in the present study, radiation therapy and chemotherapy were considered to be irrelevant factors for prognosis, and the view is consistent with many findings in the literature [10]. However, this still requires a different judgment on a case-by-case basis. In terms of tumor histology type, chondrosarcoma is resistant to radiation and chemotherapy, but multimodality therapy is still recommended in the treatment of Ewing’s sarcoma and osteosarcoma [18, 23, 26–28]. In contrast, a subgroup analysis of the study by Zhou et al. showed that the malignant outcome associated with chemotherapy was instead mostly osteosarcoma and chondrosarcoma [29]. However, certainly, the application of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is closely related to the histological type of the tumor. On the other hand, it has also been pointed out that for spinal confined tumors, chemotherapy is one of the significant worsening influences, while for spinal metastatic tumors, chemotherapy has a good therapeutic effect [18, 29]. Unlike chemotherapy, radiotherapy is thought to have a significant tumor metastasis suppression effect, significantly reducing the probability of metastasis in the group of patients who receive radiotherapy immediately after surgery [30, 31].

Adequate presurgical evaluation is extremely important for elderly patients undergoing surgery for primary tumors of the spine [5]. The nomogram developed in this study was able to predict the risk of early death of surgery in these elderly patients. It has great clinical implications for assessing whether patients can tolerate the physical challenges associated with surgery and postoperative rehabilitation. We must acknowledge the limitations of this study, particularly the unavoidable problem of bias in retrospective studies. But this nomogram can also be used as a reliable preoperative assessment tool for risk reduction.

5. Conclusions

We have developed a nomogram to predict the risk of early death of elderly patients with primary spinal tumors undergoing surgery.

Abbreviations

SEER:	Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results
OS:	Overall survival
AUC:	Area under the curve
DCA:	Decision-curve analysis

Data Availability

The publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. These data can be found at the SEER dataset repository (https://seer.cancer.gov/).

The study is based on data from public databases, and therefore does not require informed consent from patients.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

ZH H and YZ H conceived and designed the study. ZH H and Z Z performed the literature search. ZH H and YH L generated the figures and tables. ZH H, ZG Z, and WF Z analyzed the data. ZH H wrote the manuscript, and YZ H critically reviewed the manuscript. ZH H and QQ K supervised the research. All the authors have read and approved the manuscript. Zhangheng Huang and Zhen Zhao contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2020YFS0080, 2020YFQ0007, and 2021JDRC0159), Science and Technology Project of Tibet Autonomous Region (XZ201901-GB-08), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171731), and the 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University (ZYJC21026 and ZYJC21077).

References

Y. Fan, M. Cai, and L. Xia, “Distinction and potential prediction of lung metastasis in patients with malignant primary osseous spinal neoplasms,” Spine 1976, vol. 45, no. 13, pp. 921–929, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. L. Siegel, K. D. Miller, H. E. Fuchs, and A. Jemal, “Cancer statistics, 2021,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 7–33, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Sundaresan, G. Rosen, and S. Boriani, “Primary malignant tumors of the spine,” Orthopedic Clinics of North America, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 21–36, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Biermann, W. Chow, D. R. Reed et al., “NCCN guidelines insights: bone cancer, version 2.2017,” Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 155–167, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Clarke and F. D. Vrionis, “Spinal tumor surgery: management and the avoidance of complications,” Cancer Control, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 124–132, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. P. Gomes, D. Ilter, V. Low et al., “Age-induced accumulation of methylmalonic acid promotes tumour progression,” Nature, vol. 585, no. 7824, pp. 283–287, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. S. Kim, S. Y. Lee, T. R. Lee et al., “Prognostic nomogram for predicting the 5-year probability of developing metastasis after neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and definitive surgery for AJCC stage II extremity osteosarcoma,” Annals of Oncology, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 955–960, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. R. Zhou, C. C. Wang, X. J. Sun et al., “Prognostic factors in breast phyllodes tumors: a nomogram based on a retrospective cohort study of 404 patients,” Cancer Medicine, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 1030–1042, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Mao, W. Xia, G. Dong et al., “A nomogram to predict the survival of stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer after surgery,” The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, vol. 155, no. 4, pp. 1784–1792.e3, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Lin, K. Song, S. Wang, L. Jiang, H. Wang, and J. Dong, “Predict overall survival of spinal conventional chordoma: development and assessment of a new predictive nomogram,” Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery, vol. 197, Article ID 106174, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Arita, Y. Narita, Y. Miyakita, M. Ohno, M. Sumi, and S. Shibui, “Risk factors for early death after surgery in patients with brain metastases: reevaluation of the indications for and role of surgery,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 116, no. 1, pp. 145–152, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Boriani, R. Cecchinato, A. Righi et al., “Primary vascular bone tumors in the spine: a challenge for pathologists and spine oncology surgeons,” European Spine Journal, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 1502–1511, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhou, A. B. Li, Z. Q. Lin, and Hz Zhang, “A nomogram and a risk classification system predicting the cancer-specific survival of patients with initially-diagnosed osseous spinal and pelvic tumors,” Spine 1976, vol. 45, no. 12, pp. E713–e720, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ciftdemir, M. Kaya, E. Selcuk, and E. Yalniz, “Tumors of the spine,” World Journal of Orthopedics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 109–116, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Dang, X. Liu, G. Dang et al., “Primary tumors of the spine: a review of clinical features in 438 patients,” Journal of Neuro-Oncology, vol. 121, no. 3, pp. 513–520, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. McGirt, Z. L. Gokaslan, and K. L. Chaichana, “Preoperative grading scale to predict survival in patients undergoing resection of malignant primary osseous spinal neoplasms,” The Spine Journal, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 190–196, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Bergh, B. Gunterberg, J. M. Meis-Kindblom, and L. G. Kindblom, “Prognostic factors and outcome of pelvic, sacral, and spinal chondrosarcomas: a center-based study of 69 cases,” Cancer, vol. 91, no. 7, pp. 1201–1212, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Arshi, J. Sharim, D. Y. Park et al., “Chondrosarcoma of the osseous spine: an analysis of Epidemiology, patient outcomes, and prognostic factors using the SEER registry from 1973 to 2012,” Spine, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 644–652, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yin, W. Zhou, J. Meng et al., “Prognostic factors of patients with spinal chondrosarcoma: a retrospective analysis of 98 consecutive patients in a single center,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 3572–3578, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Huang, Z. Fan, C. Zhao, and H. Sun, “A novel nomogram for predicting cancer-specific survival in patients with spinal chordoma: a population-based analysis,” Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment, vol. 20, Article ID 153303382110365, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Song, J. Song, X. Shi et al., “Development and validation of nomograms predicting overall and cancer-specific survival of spinal chondrosarcoma patients,” Spine 1976, vol. 43, no. 21, pp. E1281–e1289, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Huang, S. Xian, T. Shi et al., “Evaluating and predicting the probability of death in patients with non-metastatic osteosarcoma: a population-based study,” Medical Science Monitor, vol. 25, pp. 4675–4690, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Huang, D. Han, C. Shi et al., “Construction and validation of nomograms for non-metastatic Ewing sarcoma: a prognostic factor analysis based on the SEER database,” Oncology Letters, vol. 22, no. 5, p. 777, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Pan, L. Lu, J. Chen, Y. Zhong, and Z. Dai, “Analysis of prognostic factors for survival in patients with primary spinal chordoma using the SEER Registry from 1973 to 2014,” Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 76, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Tong, Y. Cui, and L. Jiang, “Construction, Validation, and Visualization of Two Web-Based Nomograms for Predicting Overall Survival and Cancer-Specific Survival in Elderly Patients with Primary Osseous Spinal Neoplasms,” Journal of Oncology, vol. 2022, Article ID 7987967, 21 pages, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Huang, Y. Tong, and Q. J. G. Kong, “The Clinical Characteristics, Risk Classification System, and Web-Based Nomogram for Primary Spinal Ewing Sarcoma: A Large Population-Based Cohort Study,” Global Spine Journal, vol. 0, no. 0, Article ID 21925682221079261, pp. 1–9, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. F. Delaney, L. Kepka, S. I. Goldberg et al., “Radiation therapy for control of soft-tissue sarcomas resected with positive margins,” International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics, vol. 67, no. 5, pp. 1460–1469, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Hsu, T. A. Kosztowski, H. A. Zaidi, M. Dorsi, Z. L. Gokaslan, and J. P. Wolinsky, “Multidisciplinary management of primary tumors of the vertebral column,” Current Treatment Options in Oncology, vol. 10, no. 1-2, pp. 107–125, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhou, R. Huang, Z. Wei, T. Meng, and H. Yin, “The clinical characteristics and prediction nomograms for primary spine malignancies,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 11, Article ID 608323, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. A. Moojen, C. L. A. Vleggeert-Lankamp, A. D. G. Krol, and S. P. D. Dijkstra, “Long-term results: adjuvant radiotherapy in en bloc resection of sacrococcygeal chordoma is advisable,” Spine, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. E656–E661, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. H. Sun, X. Hong, B. Liu et al., “Survival analysis of patients with spinal chordomas,” Neurosurgical Review, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 455–462, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Zhangheng Huang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

368

Downloads

347

Citations