Pretreatment Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level Serves as a Potential Biomarker to Guide Adjuvant Radiotherapy in pT4N+ Colon Cancer Patients

Luo, Dakui; Zhang, Ruoxin; Yang, Yufei; Li, Qingguo; Li, Xinxiang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4815996

Journal of Oncology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Data Availability Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2023 | Article ID 4815996 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/4815996

Pretreatment Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level Serves as a Potential Biomarker to Guide Adjuvant Radiotherapy in pT4N+ Colon Cancer Patients

Dakui Luo,^1,2Ruoxin Zhang,^1,2Yufei Yang,^1,2Qingguo Li,^1,2and Xinxiang Li^1,2

Academic Editor: Xiangya Ding

Received11 May 2022

Revised18 Jan 2023

Accepted31 Jan 2023

Published16 Feb 2023

Abstract

The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in T4 colon cancer (CC) remains controversial, with conflicting results reported in the literature. This study aimed to explore the relationship between pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level and overall survival (OS) of pT4N+ CC patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy. Data of pT4N+ CC patients who received curative surgery between 2004 and 2015 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The primary outcome was OS, and subgroup analysis was conducted according to pretreatment CEA level. A total of 8763 patients were eligible for our study. In the CEA-normal group, 151 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, while 3932 patients did not. In the CEA-elevated group, 212 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, while 4468 patients did not. In general, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with better OS in pT4N+ CC patients (HR = 0.846, 95% CI = 0.733–0.976, ). Intriguingly, only patients with an elevated pretreatment CEA level gained a survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 0.782; 95% CI = 0.651–0.939; ) while those with a normal pretreatment CEA level did not (HR = 0.907; 95% CI = 0.721–1.141; ). Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that adjuvant radiotherapy was an independent protective factor in pT4N+ CC patients with an elevated pretreatment CEA level. Pretreatment CEA levels could serve as a potential biomarker to screen pT4N+ CC patients who would benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy.

1. Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most prevalent malignant tumor and the second most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide [1]. Surgery-based comprehensive therapy is the gold standard for the treatment of stage III disease. Despite the fact that radiotherapy has been widely adopted for locally advanced rectal cancer, the role of radiotherapy in the management of colon cancer (CC) is largely undefined. About 10% to 15% of CC patients are diagnosed with T4 disease that penetrates the colonic serosa. The oncological outcomes remain poor for T4 CC although these patients receive multivisceral resection and adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy [2]. Several retrospective studies evaluated the value of adjuvant radiotherapy in T4 CC patients, with conflicting results [3–7]. A recent study indicated that adjuvant radiotherapy did not improve survival in T4 CC using the National Cancer Database and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) [8]. Definitely, it is unreasonable to adopt adjuvant radiotherapy for all T4 CC patients, especially those without lymph node involvement. Therefore, it is necessary to identify a subgroup that benefits more from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is the most widely applied marker in the follow-up of CRC, and an elevated CEA level often indicates tumor relapse and poor prognosis [9–11]. Furthermore, CEA level has been found to be a potential biomarker guiding neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy [12, 13]. Our previous study also evaluated the guiding role of an elevated pretreatment serum CEA level for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA CC [14]. In our present study, we would like to determine whether pretreatment CEA level could serve as a potential biomarker to guide adjuvant radiotherapy in pT4N+ CC patients.

2. Methods

2.1. Patient Selection

This is a retrospective cohort study. pT4N + M0 CC (AJCC 7th edition) patients who received curative surgery and had the definite data regarding pretreatment CEA status and adjuvant radiotherapy were recruited from the SEER database (2004–2015). The SEER database (https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/) was an authoritative and public source of information on cancer incidence, mortality, prevalence, lifetime risk statistics, and survival among 26% of the population in 18 cancer registries in the United States. In general, the inclusion criteria were detailed as follows: patients were diagnosed with pT4N + M0 CC; patients did not receive neoadjuvant radiotherapy; curative surgery was performed; patients had a definite CEA status; survival data were available. The exclusion criteria were detailed as follows: patients with distant metastases; patients who received both neoadjuvant radiotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. The following pathological and survival data were collected: histologic type, grade, tumor size, node stage, radiotherapy, pretreatment serum CEA level, and survival data. Overall survival (OS) was regarded as a primary endpoint. OS was defined as the time from the date of diagnosis to the date of death.

2.2. Statistical Analysis

The differences of categorical variables between two groups were determined by χ² test. The Kaplan–Meier (K−M) method and the univariate Cox regression model were utilized for comparison of the survival difference between the two groups with a log-rank test. A multivariate Cox regression model was used to seek for the independent prognostic factors. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 25.0.

3. Results

3.1. Patients’ Characteristics

A total of 8763 patients were eligible for our study. 363 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 8400 patients did not receive adjuvant radiotherapy. In CEA-normal group, 151 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, while 3932 patients did not. In the CEA-elevated group, 212 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy, while 4468 patients did not. The baseline characteristics between two groups stratified by CEA status are summarized in Table 1.

3.2. Survival Benefit of pT4N + M0 CC Patients from Adjuvant Radiotherapy

First, we evaluated the role of adjuvant radiotherapy in pT4N + M0 CC patients. As expected, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with better oncological outcomes (HR = 0.846; 95% CI: 0.733–0.976; ) (Figure 1(a)). Remarkably, pT4N2M0 CC patients gained more survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy (HR = 0.683; 95% CI: 0.542–0.861; ). Kaplan−Meier curves are plotted (Figure 1(b)).

(a)

(b)

3.3. Association of Pretreatment CEA Status and Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Predicting Prognosis

Next, we wonder whether serum CEA status had a guiding role in predicting a survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. We found that receipt of adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with better oncological outcomes in the CEA-elevated group (5-year OS: 31.0% VS 35.9%, log-rank test, P = 0.008; HR = 0.782, 95% CI = 0.651–0.939, P = 0.008) (Figure 2(a)). Similarly, after adjusting for other pathological prognostic factors, the results of multivariate Cox analysis indicated that adjuvant radiotherapy significantly decreased mortality risk in the CEA-elevated group (HR = 0.781; 95% CI: 0.649–0.938; , Table 2). On the contrary, receiving or not receiving adjuvant radiotherapy did not presented a survival difference statistically in CEA-normal group (5-year OS: 44.8% vs. 46.0%, log-rank test, ; HR = 0.907, 95% CI = 0.721–1.141, P = 0.403) (Figure 2(b)).

(a)

(b)

4. Discussion

In the current study, we demonstrated that pT4N + M0 CC patients could benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Especially, only pT4N + M0 CC patients with elevated pretreatment CEA level obtained a survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy while those with normal pretreatment CEA level did not. Further multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that adjuvant radiotherapy was an independent protective factor in pT4N+ CC patients with an elevated pretreatment CEA level.

There has been controversy over adopting adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced CC. Despite this, current NCCN guidelines recommend receipt of radiotherapy for T4 CC patients. In earlier research, postoperative radiotherapy appeared to improve local control in T4 CC patients [3, 4]. In the modern chemotherapy era, evidence indicated that the benefits of locoregional control and enhanced disease-free survival were still observed for T4 colon cancer treatment with adjuvant radiotherapy [5]. A prospective, randomized controlled trial (Intergroup-0130) evaluated the role of radiotherapy in resected CC but failed to meet its accrual goals [6]. Recently, Margalit et al. reported that postoperative radiation did not improve overall survival in individuals with pathologic stage T4 colon cancer using the National Cancer Database [7]. Specifically, T4b colon tumors also did not obtain a survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy, regardless of surgical margin status. Similarly, another large comparative study also demonstrated that T4 CC patients did not benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy using the National Cancer Database and the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program [8]. It is interesting to note whether a specific subgroup is likely to benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Adjuvant radiotherapy is currently recommended for node-positive middle and low-grade rectal cancer, which does not receive neoadjuvant radiotherapy to reduce the local recurrence rate. We wondered whether adjuvant radiotherapy improved survival in pT4 node-positive CC patients. Our study demonstrated that adjuvant radiotherapy resulted in a decreased risk of mortality. Consistently, Huang et al. found that adjuvant radiotherapy could decrease CC-related mortality risk by nearly 30% in the T4N2M0 subgroup, which was significantly higher than the 11.51% of the general T4 population [15].

Pretreatment CEA level has been identified as a predictive biomarker of treatment response. Wang et al. found that the pretreatment CEA level may be considered a potential biomarker to select locally advanced rectal cancer patients who would benefit from preoperative radiotherapy [16]. Huang et al. reported that pretreatment serum CEA level may serve as a promising biomarker guiding adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients with ypT3N0M0 following neoadjuvant radiotherapy [17]. These studies indicated that the pretreatment CEA level could be used as a determinant for adopting neoadjuvant radiotherapy. Although adjuvant radiotherapy for pT4 node-positive patients offers a survival advantage, it is unreasonable to adopt adjuvant radiotherapy for all pT4 node-positive CC patients in terms of therapeutic toxicity and treatment cost. It is valuable to identify a subgroup that benefits more from adjuvant radiotherapy. Intriguingly, our results indicated that adjuvant radiotherapy would only benefit pT4N+ CC patients with an elevated pretreatment CEA level. This finding suggested that pretreatment CEA level could be used as a potential biomarker to select pT4N+ CC patients who would gain the long-term survival benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time in the literature that we have found a biomarker to guide adjuvant radiotherapy in T4N+ CC patients. It is particularly important for pT4N+ CC patients with a normal pretreatment CEA level to avoid the side effects of radiotherapy without compromising oncological outcomes.

However, there are several inevitable limitations to the present study. First, selection bias is hard to avoid in a retrospective analysis. Second, data regarding serum CEA level after surgery were unavailable in the SEER database. Besides that, data regarding the circumferential resection margin and tumor deposits in the SEER database were unavailable between 2005 and 2009. Thus, we did not include these important parameters for further analysis. Third, it is impossible to recognize T4a or T4b from this subgroup.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, pretreatment CEA level could serve as a potential biomarker to identify pT4N+ CC patients who benefited from adjuvant radiotherapy.

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Disclosure

The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or manuscript preparation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

XL and QL conceived this study. DL, RZ, and YY improved the study design and contributed to the interpretation of results. DL collected the data. RZ performed data processing and statistical analysis. DL wrote the manuscript. QL revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final version. Dakui Luo, Ruoxin Zhang, and Yufei Yang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the efforts of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program tumor registries in the creation of the SEER database. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 81972260 and 82103259), Shanghai Municipal Natural Science Foundation (Grant no. 21ZR1414400), and Shanghai Medical Innovation Research Project (Grant no. 22Y11907600).

References

H. Sung, J. Ferlay, R. L. Siegel et al., “Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 209–249, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Gunderson, J. M. Jessup, D. J. Sargent, F. L. Greene, and A. K. Stewart, “Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcomes data,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 264–271, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. G. Willett, S. Goldberg, P. C. Shellito et al., “Does postoperative irradiation play a role in the adjuvant therapy of stage T4 colon cancer?” Cancer Journal From Scientific American, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 242–247, 1999.
View at: Google Scholar
E. H. Amos, W. M. Mendenhall, P. J. McCarty et al., “Postoperative radiotherapy for locally advanced colon cancer,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 431–436, 1996.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. B. Ludmir, R. Arya, Y. Wu, M. Palta, C. G. Willett, and B. G. Czito, “Role of adjuvant radiotherapy in locally advanced colonic carcinoma in the modern chemotherapy era,” Annals of Surgical Oncology, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 856–862, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. A. Martenson, C. G. Willett, D. J. Sargent et al., “Phase III study of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy compared with chemotherapy alone in the surgical adjuvant treatment of colon cancer: results of intergroup protocol 0130,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 22, no. 16, pp. 3277–3283, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Margalit, R. Mamtani, Y. R. Lawrence et al., “Postoperative radiation for pathologic stage T4 colon cancers receiving adjuvant chemotherapy,” Clinical Colorectal Cancer, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 226–230, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. T. Sebastian, Y. Tan, E. D. Miller, T. M. Williams, and D. A. Diaz, “Surgery with and without adjuvant radiotherapy is associated with similar survival in T4 colon cancer,” Colorectal Disease, vol. 22, no. 7, pp. 779–789, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. J. Duffy, A. van Dalen, C. Haglund et al., “Tumour markers in colorectal cancer: European Group on Tumour Markers (EGTM) guidelines for clinical use,” European Journal of Cancer, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1348–1360, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Y. Locker, S. Hamilton, J. Harris et al., “ASCO 2006 update of recommendations for the use of tumor markers in gastrointestinal cancer,” Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 24, no. 33, pp. 5313–5327, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Konishi, Y. Shimada, M. Hsu et al., “Association of preoperative and postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and colon cancer outcome,” JAMA Oncology, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 309–315, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Cheong, J. S. Shin, and K. W. Suh, “Prognostic value of changes in serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels for preoperative chemoradiotherapy response in locally advanced rectal cancer,” World Journal of Gastroenterology, vol. 26, no. 44, pp. 7022–7035, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Eftekhar and F. Naghibalhossaini, “Carcinoembryonic antigen expression level as a predictive factor for response to 5-fluorouracil in colorectal cancer,” Molecular Biology Reports, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 459–466, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Liu, Y. Huang, D. Luo et al., “Evaluating the guiding role of elevated pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA colon cancer: a large population-based and propensity score-matched study,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 9, no. 37, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Huang, X. Gu, K. Ge, G. Fu, J. Chu, and W. Wei, “The survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T4N2M0 colon cancer in the Modern Chemotherapy Era: evidence from the SEER database 2004–2015,” Artificial Cells, Nanomedicine, and Biotechnology, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 834–840, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Wang, X. Zhong, H. Lin, L. Shao, G. Chen, and J. Wu, “The correlation between survival benefit of preoperative radiotherapy and pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level in locally advanced rectal cancer,” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 11, Article ID 735882, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Huang, M. Jiang, Y. Li, C. Tang, X. Ma, and X. Huan, “Can elevated pretreatment serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels serve as a potential biomarker guiding adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer patients with ypTis-3N0 after neoadjuvant radiotherapy and surgery?” Frontiers in Oncology, vol. 11, Article ID 705460, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2023 Dakui Luo et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

202

Downloads

314

Citations