Review Article

Osteogenic Potential of Dental Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Preclinical Studies: A Systematic Review Using Modified ARRIVE and CONSORT Guidelines

Table 1

Categories used to assess the quality of selected in vitro studies (modified from the ARRIVE and CONSORT guidelines) [26].

ItemDescriptionGrade

1Title(0) Inaccurate/nonconcise
(1) Concise/adequate

2Abstract: either a structured summary of background, research objectives, key experiment methods, principal findings, and conclusion of the study or self-contained (should contain enough information to enable a good understanding of the rationale for the approach)(1) Clearly inadequate
(2) Possibly accurate
(3) Clearly accurate

3Introduction: background, experimental approach, and explanation of rationale/hypothesis(1) Insufficient
(2) Possibly sufficient/some information
(3) Clearly meets/sufficient

4Introduction: preprimary and secondary objectives for the experiments (specific primary/secondary objectives)(1) Not clearly stated
(2) Clearly stated

5Methods: study design explained number of experimental and control groups, steps to reduce bias (demonstrating the consistency of the experiment (done more than once), sufficient detail for replication, blinding in evaluation, etc.)(1) Clearly insufficient
(2) Possibly sufficient
(3) Clearly sufficient

6Methods: precise details of experimental procedure (i.e., how, when, where, and why)(1) Clearly insufficient
(2) Possibly sufficient
(3) Clearly sufficient

7Methods: How sample size was determined (details of control and experimental group) and sample size calculation.(1) No
(2) Unclear/not complete
(3) Adequate/clear

8Methods: Details of statistical methods and analysis (statistical methods used to compare groups)(1) No
(2) Unclear/not complete
(3) Adequate/clear

9Results: explanation for any excluded data, results of each analysis with a measure of precision as standard deviation or standard error or confidence interval(1) No
(2) Unclear/not complete
(3) Adequate/clear

10Discussion: interpretation/scientific implication, limitations, and generalizability/translation(0) Clearly inadequate
(1) Possibly accurate
(2) Clearly accurate

11Statement of potential conflicts and funding disclosure(0) No
(1) Yes

12Publication in a peer-review journal(0) No
(1) Yes