Stem Cells International / 2021 / Article / Tab 3 / Review Article
FGF2 and EGF for the Regeneration of Tympanic Membrane: A Systematic Review Table 3 Summary of FGF2 and EGF effects on human chronic perforation.
Authors Study object Etiology Study design Size of perforation Follow-up (months) Treatment strategy Closure rate Closure time (weeks) FGF2 group Control group FGF2 group Control group FGF2 group Control group FGF2 group Control group Hakuba et al. [47 ] (2003) 14 adult COM Control study 16.5% 9.6% 3 FAS for 2 weeks SAS for 2 weeks 100% (9/9) 40% (2/5) 3.7 (2-6) 3.6 (2-4) Hakuba et al. [48 ] (2010) 87 adult 60 COM:7 VT:20 trauma Observation study 14.4% 3 FAS for 3 weeks 92.0% (80/87) 4.8 Kanemaru et al. [49 ] (2011) 63 adult COM Randomized control trial. 3 FGF via GF for 3 weeks Saline via GF 98.1% (52/53) 10.0% (1/10) 41 (78.8%) within 3 12 Hakuba et al. [50 ] (2013) 116 adult 77 COM:12 trauma:15 VT Observation study 12 FAS for 3 weeks 62% (73/116) Unclear Acharya et al. [51 ] (2015) 12 children VT or COM Prospective cohort study 6-40% 12 FGF via Gel for 3 weeks 58% (7/12) 2-12 Hakuba et al. [52 ] (2015) 153 adult COM Retrospective cohort study 12 FAS for 3 weeks 66.0% (101/153) 4.5 Omae et al. [53 ] (2017) 10 adult 5 COM:trauma Prospective clinical trial 3 FGF via Gel for 4 weeks 88.9% (8/9) 57 days Santos et al. [54 ] (2020) 54 adult Trauma, COM, and unknown Randomized controlled trial 82.4% 75 3 FGF via Gel for 3 weeks SGF for 3 weeks 57.5%(23/40) 71.4% (10/14) 14 in one, 8 in 2, and 1 in 3 4 in one, 5 in 2, and 1 in 3 Ramsay et al. [55 ] (1995) 17 adult 1 traumatic and 16 COM Double-blind randomized control trial Unclear Unclear 2.6 EGF via paper PBS+paper 0/8, size of perforation mean decrease 0.3% 1/9, 2.7%
FAS: bFGF via atelocollagen and sealed by silicon layer; SAS: saline via atelocollagen and sealed by silicon layer; FGF: FGF-2 via gelatin sponge and sealed by fibrin glue; GF: gelatin sponge and fibrin glue. COM: chronic otitis media; VT: ventilation tube; Gel: gelatin sponge.