Stromal Vascular Fraction and Amniotic Epithelial Cells: Preclinical and Clinical Relevance in Musculoskeletal Regenerative Medicine
Table 3
In vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies on SVF in tendon regeneration.
Experimental model
Treatment groups
Evaluations
Results
Ref
In vivo: 20 adult NZW rabbits (2.5-3 kg) with complete transaction of DDFT midsubstance Allogenic SVF () from inguinal region
Group 1: PBS (0.2 ml) Group 2: SVF
Histology Histomorphometry IHC (COLL I, COLL III) Biomechanics
2 mo Group 2: ↑ fibrillar linearity, fibrillar continuity, COLL I protein, ultimate load, energy absorption, stiffness; ↓ no. of capillaries in neotendon, COLL III protein than group 1
In vivo: 36 adult NZW rabbits (2.5-3 kg) with a complete transaction through the central one third of flexor tendon Allogenic SVF () from inguinal region Allogenic BMSCs () from iliac crest
Group 1: PBS (0.2 ml) Group 2: SVF Group 3: BMSCs
Biomechanics
3 and 8 wks Groups 2 and 3: ↑ energy absorption, ultimate load, ultimate stress, yield load, stiffness than group 1
In vivo: 36 adult NZW rabbits (2-2.5 kg) with supraspinatus tendon severed from the great trochanter Autologous SVF from inguinal region
Group 1: FG (1 ml) Group 2: SVF+FG (1 ml)
Radiography Biomechanics
1 mo Group 2: ↑ maximum load, maximum strength than group 1 2 mo Group 2: ↑ maximum load, maximum strength, stiffness than group 1 3 mo Group 2: ↑ SNQ, stiffness than group 1
Clinical trial: 44 pz (18-55 yrs) with unilateral or bilateral chronic tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon Allogenic SVF (4 ml) from abdomen
Group 1: PRP (4 ml) Group 2: SVF
Clinical evaluation
2 wks, 1 mo, 4 mo, and 6 mo Groups 1 and 2: ↓ VAS pain scale; ↑ VISA-A score, AOFAS score, SF-36 than presurgery 2 wks Group 2: ↓ VAS pain scale; ↑ VISA-A score, AOFAS score than group 1 1 mo Group 2: ↓ VAS pain scale than group 1