Prognostic Value of MTV and TLG of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in Patients with Stage I and II Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

Wen, Weibo; Piao, Yongnan; Xu, Dongyuan; Li, Xiangdan

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7528971

Contrast Media & Molecular Imaging

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 7528971 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7528971

Prognostic Value of MTV and TLG of ¹⁸F-FDG PET in Patients with Stage I and II Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: a Meta-Analysis

Weibo Wen,^1,2Yongnan Piao,¹Dongyuan Xu,²and Xiangdan Li²

Academic Editor: Giorgio Treglia

Received11 Oct 2021

Accepted30 Oct 2021

Published22 Nov 2021

Abstract

Purpose. The present systematic literature review and meta-analysis focused on examining the significance of total lesion glycolysis (TLG) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) in predicting the prognosis of stages I/II non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on ¹⁸F-FDG PET parameters. Methods. Electronic databases, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE, were comprehensively searched for retrieving relevant articles published in the English language. Furthermore, the significance of TLG and MTV in prognosis prediction was analyzed by pooled hazard ratios (HRs). Results. This work enrolled eight primary studies with 1292 I/II-stage NSCLC cases. The pooled HR (95% confidence interval [CI]) for the ability of increased TLG to predict progression-free survival (PFS) was 2.02 (1.30–2.13) (), while for increased MTV it was 3.04 (1.92–4.81) (). In addition, the pooled HR (95% CI) for the ability of increased TLG to predict overall survival (OS) was 2.16 (1.49–3.14) (). However, higher MTV correlated with OS, and sensitivity analysis showed that the results were not stable. Multivariate and univariate analyses by subgroup analyses stratified by PFS of MTV and OS of TLG exhibited statistically significant differences, without any statistical heterogeneity across various articles. Conclusion. The present work suggests the predictive value of PET/CT among stage I and II NSCLC patients. Our results verified that stage I/II NSCLC cases with increased TLG and MTV had a higher risk of side reactions, and TLG is related to increased mortality risk.

1. Introduction

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a frequently occurring lung cancer subtype, with its incidence rising globally [1]. It is still responsible for most cancer-related deaths worldwide [2, 3]. Accurate prognostic factors are essential for patient management, as patients with surgery or dismal prognosis can benefit from additional neoadjuvant treatment [4].

More attention has been paid to applying the volumetric metabolic parameters like metabolic tumor volume (MTV) or total lesion glycolysis (TLG). The average SUV and MTV are determined through the threshold-defined margin contouring. TLG is determined by the multiplication of MTV with average SUV, and it can weigh tumor metabolic activity and volumetric burden [5–7]. TLG and MTV from 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) have been identified as the standard staging methods, also used to monitor therapeutic response and predict prognosis of different cancers, such as NSCLC [5, 8–10]. As suggested in recent systematic reviews and meta-analyses [11, 12], TLG and MTV negatively correlated with NSCLC prognosis. Consequently, it is essential to identify prognostic factors for NSCLC cases [13].

Some articles examined the relationships of tumor prognosis and response with TLG and MTV from 18F-FDG PET in stage I/II NSCLC patients. Nonetheless, the significance of TLG and MTV from 18F-FDG PET/CT for the prognosis prediction of stage I/II NSCLC patients remains controversial. Certain articles suggested that the increased MTV was significantly related to the dismal prognostic outcome for NSCLC patients in stages I and II [14, 15]. In contrast, a different conclusion was observed by Vu et al. [16].

In this regard, the present meta-analysis focused on summarizing findings reported in published articles examining the significance of TLG and MTV in predicting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in stage I/II NSCLC patients.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study

The present study was carried out following the preferred reporting items of the systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement guidelines [17].

2.2. Data Search and Study Selection

Electronic databases, including Cochrane Library (2012–May 2019), PubMed, and Embase, were searched using the keywords below (“NSCLC” OR “lung neoplasms” OR “lung carcinoma” OR “lung neoplasms”) AND (“positron emission tomography-computed tomography” OR “PET-CT” OR “positron emission tomography-computed tomography” OR “PET/CT” OR “positron emission tomography” OR “PET CT” OR “fluorodeoxyglucose” OR “FDG”) AND (“outcome” OR “prognosis” OR “prognostic” OR “survival” OR “predictive”). Studies conforming to the following criteria were included: (1) studies including the histological diagnosis of stage I and II NSCLC patients; (2) studies using 18F-FDG PET/CT as the imaging modality prior to treatment, articles that reported survival data by MTV or TLG; (3) articles published in English. However, case reports, reviews, editorial materials, and conference abstracts were excluded. Studies were searched and screened by two independent reviewers, and any disagreement between them was settled through mutual negotiation to reach a consensus.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The identical method utilized in our prior work was adopted [18]. The present work pooled disease-free survival (DFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and PFS from all the enrolled articles and redefined PFS [19]. Parmar et al.’s method was adopted for extracting survival data [20]. PFS, OS, hazard ratios (HRs), and the appropriate 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) with corresponding variations were determined through STATA version 12.0 (STATA Corp., College Station, TX). Data on HRs and 95% CIs obtained by multivariate analysis were obtained directly from each work. As for missing multivariate HRs, the univariate HRs were obtained. For missing univariate and multivariate HRs, Parmar et al.’s method [21] was adopted for reconstructing HR estimates together with the variance using Kaplan–Meier curves-derived survival data through Engauge Digitizer (version 9.4). The pooled HR represented the effect value displaying the significance of prognosis. HR > 1 indicated a poor prognosis for cases showing increased TLG or MTV, while HR < 1 stood for survival benefit for cases showing increased TLG or MTV. Egger’s test and Begg’s test were adopted for evaluating bias using STATA version 12.0.

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

Our study searched electronic databases Embase, Cochrane Library, and PubMed, and 177, 0, and 162 studies involving 1,590 cases were collected, respectively. Meeting summaries and duplicates were excluded, and 56 eligible studies were retained. Among them, 48 were eliminated, including 26 due to unwanted study design, six unrelated to NSCLC, 9 introducing one case report, and seven without creditable data. Finally, eight articles involving 1292 cases published from 2012 to 2020 meeting the inclusion criteria were enrolled [13, 16, 22–25] (Figure 1).

3.2. Study Characteristics

Five articles were carried out in Asia (including 1 in China, 1 in Israel, 2 in Korea, and 1 in Japan), 1 in Italy, and 2 in the USA. All articles were published from 2012 to 2020, with a sample size of 39–529. All the studies were retrospective. Six studies analyzed stage I NSCLC patients, and two studies analyzed stage I and II NSCLC patients. Three studies analyzed PFS, 1 analyzed DFS, 1 analyzed RFS, and 6 analyzed OS. The follow-up duration was 13.2–68 months. These eight articles involved at least one histological characteristic and treatment. Table 1 presents details on all the enrolled articles, treatment, and histology. In addition, the FDG injection volume was 370–666 MBq. Table 2 tabulates fasting duration, blood glucose test before injection, interval after injection, and threshold determination.

3.3. Literature Quality Evaluation

This work evaluated all the enrolled study quality by CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF PROGNOSTIC STUDIES (https://www.cebm.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Prognosis.pdf; Figure 2). The enrolled literature was carefully reviewed. Although the included studies were retrospective, most were high-quality. One of the enrolled articles was evaluated to be of high risk, while 3 of unknown bias risk in established typical sample measurement domain because of the nonrandomized or nonblinded study design. As for the prognostic factor domain, namely, the measurement of the follow-up period, two articles displayed a high bias risk, and 3 showed an unknown bias risk because median follow-up may not be long enough, and information on subsequent recurrences may be partially missing. Most enrolled articles were described well, and side reactions were observed objectively.

(a)

(b)

3.4. Primary Outcome: PFS

Five articles examined PFS and MTV. The HRs were combined, and the increased MTV value predicted poor PFS. No statistical significance was detected using the fixed-effects model (HR = 3.04; 95% CI = 1.92–4.81; P = 0.793; I² = 0.0%) (Figure 3(a)), with no obvious heterogeneity across diverse articles. This study also carried out a sensitivity analysis to predict its influence on HRs. No obvious change was detected when a single study was eliminated in succession (Supplementary Figure 1(a)), which suggested result stability. Obvious publication bias was not detected from funnel plots (Supplementary Figure 2(a)). Egger’s and Begg’s tests were conducted to evaluate the possible publication bias. Neither Egger’s () nor Begg’s test () revealed obvious publication bias (Supplementary Figure 3(a)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

The chi-square test measures the heterogeneity. is indicative of obvious heterogeneity. Squares = individual study point estimates. Horizontal lines = 95% CIs. Rhombus = summarized estimate and its 95%CI. Fixed: fixed-effects model. Random: random-effects model.

This study also conducted subgroup analyses stratified by the analysis, threshold, and region method (Table 3). In the region-stratified subgroup analysis, three articles from Asia showed HR of 3.22 (95% CI: 1.84–5.62; ), and one study from Europe showed significant correlations (HR = 3.29; 95% CI = 1.27–8.52). However, one study from America showed no significance (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 0.44–8.11). One article adopting the ROC-based threshold method showed the HR value of 4.07 (95%CI: 1.25–13.25), while four adopting the threshold method based on additional methods showed HR of 2.89 (95%CI: 1.75–4.75; ). Concerning the analysis method, two articles according to multivariate analysis showed HR of 3.01 (95%CI = 1.59–5.67; ), while three based on univariate analysis showed HR of 3.08 (95%CI = 1.58–5.99; ).

Three articles examined PFS and TLG. The HRs were combined, which revealed that an increased MTV estimated a more dismal PFS. Statistical significance was detected from the fixed-effects model (HR = 2.02; 95% CI = 1.30–2.13; ; I² = 4.7%) (Figure 3(b)), with no obvious heterogeneity among diverse articles. This study also conducted a sensitivity analysis to estimate the influence on pooled HRs. No obvious change was detected when a single study was eliminated in succession (Supplementary Figure 1(b)), indicating the stability of our results. Obvious publication bias was not detected from funnel plots (Supplementary Figure 2(b)). Due to only three studies being included, no potential publication bias and subgroup analyses were further assessed.

3.5. Secondary Outcome: OS

Six articles analyzed OS and MTV. The HRs were combined, and statistical significance was detected using the random-effects model (HR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.10–3.53; ; I² = 74.3%) (Figure 3(c)). However, sensitivity analysis for predicting the influence of pooled HRs was also conducted (Supplementary Figure 1(c)), which revealed no significance after the study of Suman Shrestha et al., Seung Hyup Hyun et al., or Abelson et al. was removed sequentially.

Five articles analyzed OS and TLG. The HRs were combined, and an increased TLG value was related to the dismal OS. Statistical significance was detected using the fixed-effects model (HR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.49–3.14; ; I² = 0.0%) (Figure 3(d)), with no obvious heterogeneity across diverse articles. A sensitivity analysis was also carried out for predicting the influence on pooled HRs, and no obvious change was detected when a single study was eliminated in succession (Supplementary Figure 1(d)), indicating the stability of our results. Obvious publication bias was not detected from funnel plots (Supplementary Figure 2(c)). Egger’s and Begg’s tests were conducted to assess the possible publication bias. Neither Egger’s () nor Begg’s test showed any obvious publication bias (Supplementary Figure 3(c)).

Further subgroup analysis was conducted by the analysis, threshold, and region method (Table 3). There were four articles in Asia, whose HR was 2.17 (95% CI: 1.46–3.23; ). One study in America did not reveal any significance (HR = 2.13; 95% CI = 0.75–6.04). There was 1 article adopting the ROC-based threshold method, which revealed no obvious significance (HR = 3.73; 95% CI = 0.84–16.51) and four studies adopting threshold method based on additional methods, which revealed significant correlation and HR of 2.09 (95%CI: 1.42–3.07; ). Three articles adopted multivariate analysis concerning the analysis method, whose HR was 2.85 (95%CI = 1.68–4.83; ). However, two studies using univariate analysis showed no significant correlations (HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 0.97–2.79).

4. Discussion

NSCLC cases are detected early. Therefore, it is crucial to estimate treatment outcomes or assess treatment response in the early stage. Our work focused on exploring the significance of 18F-FDG PET-derived MTV/TLG in predicting the prognosis of stage I/II NSCLC cases. TLG and MTV indicate the tumor biological features, thereby shedding light on tumor outcomes [26, 27]. Previous studies also provided prognostic information on PET for lung cancer. Im et al. [12] found that MTV and TLG on ¹⁸F-FDG PET were the typical factors to predict the prognosis of NSCLC cases. Jing et al. [11] discovered that the increased MTV and SUV max values from ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were related to a higher risk of relapse or mortality among the NSCLC cases receiving surgery. Eight studies included in total 1292 patients in this study, and different factors were found to affect TLG and MTV. As verified in this work, stage I/II NSCLC cases with increased TLG and MTV values were associated with a higher incidence of side reactions, whereas TLG was related to increased mortality risk. However, this work failed to illustrate the significance of MTV in predicting the mortality risk in stage I and II NSCLC patients.

Six articles analyzed MTV in OS. The HRs were combined, and the random-effects model (HR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.10–3.53; ; I² = 74.3%) (Figure 3(a)) showed statistically significant correlations. However, our results were not stable due to the small sample size revealed by sensitivity analysis, leading to poor statistical power. All six studies included can provide important prognostic information for stage I/II lung cancer. The study by Suman Shrestha et al., Seung Hyup Hyun et al., and Abelson et al. confirmed that high MTV was related to increased mortality risk. More large prospective articles could be conducted for validating MTV's significance in predicting the mortality risk for stage I/II NSCLC cases.

There was no evident heterogeneity detected for MTV in predicting PFS (I² = 0.0%; ). Besides, Egger’s and Begg’s tests for MTV in PFS did not reveal any obvious bias of publication. However, some confounders might affect the relationship of MTV/TLG with survival. As a result, subgroup analysis was carried out by the analysis, threshold, and region method. In region-stratified subgroup analysis, Asian location, others group, and multivariate and univariate groups showed statistical significance and no heterogeneity. Only one American study analyzed PFS with MTV, which did not significantly correlate with each other (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 0.44–8.1). Our result reliability was influenced by the not high enough statistical power. In this meta-analysis, PFS, EFS, and DFS were combined and redefined as PFS. Only Hyun et al. [15] analyzed DFS and Vu et al. [16] analyzed RFS. Thus, we did not perform additional subgroup analyses according to the endpoint. More articles are needed to validate MTV's prognosis prediction effect for stage I-II NSCLC patients.

Similarly, no evident heterogeneity was detected for OS in predicting TLG (I² = 0.0%; ). Moreover, Egger’s and Begg’s tests for TLG in OS did not reveal any obvious bias of publication. However, some confounders might affect the relationship of MTV/TLG with survival. Subgroup analysis was carried out by the analysis, threshold, and region method. In region-stratified subgroup analysis, Asian location, others group, and multivariate group revealed no statistically significant heterogeneity. Only 1 study in the American subgroup (HR = 1.66; 95% CI = 0.44–8.1) and two studies of the univariate subgroup (HR = 1.65; 95% CI = 0.97–2.79) analyzed OS with TLG, which showed no significant correlations. The not high enough statistical power might affect our result reliability. Thus, more articles are needed to validate MTV’s prognostic significance in stage I-II NSCLC patients.

No apparent heterogeneity was detected for PFS in predicting TLG (I² = 43.2%; ) since only three studies analyzed PFS with TLG, which showed significant correlations. Sensitivity analysis supported that our results were stable. More studies are needed for validating PFS’s prognostic value for TLG in stage I/II NSCLC patients.

MTV and TLG are both affected by SUV (standard uptake value) [18]. However, SUV is influenced by several patient-dependent and technical parameters, such as blood glucose levels, fasting duration, uptake duration, and attenuation correction, which must be strictly controlled [28]. Following the 18F-FDG PET imaging guidelines, the heterogeneity in PET/CT parameters was within normal limits (Table 2) [18, 29, 30]. SUV and other confounders possibly influence the relation of MTV/TLG with survival, and the increased TLG and MTV were related to patient survival. However, this study failed to establish the best threshold for MTV or TLG. Future high-quality study design and methods could find the best threshold for TLG and MTV.

However, our study had several limitations. First, all our enrolled articles were retrospective studies where results might not be robust enough, which may carry biases. Second, SUV or additional confounders may affect survival, MTV, and TLG. Besides, our study failed to determine the best threshold for MTV and TLG. Third, PFS, EFS, and DFS were not identical, which may lead to bias. Fourth, there may be language bias since it included only English-published studies. Additionally, follow-up time and selection of some works were high risks, leading to potential imprecisions. Nonetheless, evaluating publication bias supports our result reliability. Therefore, for further confirmation, more multicenter RCTs should be conducted.

5. Conclusion

Our work verified that stage I/II NSCLC cases with increased TLG and MTV have a higher risk of side reactions, and TLG is related to increased mortality risk. However, this work did not suggest that MTV significantly predicts the mortality risk in stage I and II NSCLC patients. More large prospective articles should be conducted to verify the significance of TLG and MTV in predicting the prognosis of stage I/II NSCLC cases.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All the authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figure 1. Sensitivity analysis for PFS with MTV (a), TLG (b) and OS with MTV (c), TLG (d). PFS = progression-free survival, OS = overall survival, MTV = metabolic tumor volume, TLG = total lesion glycolysis. Supplementary Figure 2. Funnel plots for PFS with MTV (a), TLG (b) and OS with TLG (c). The pseudo 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed as part of the analysis to produce the funnel plots and corresponded to the expected 95% CI for a given standard error (SE). HR indicates hazard ratio. PFS = progression-free survival, OS = overall survival, MTV = metabolic tumor volume, TLG = total lesion glycolysis. Supplementary Figure 3. Egger’s test for PFS with MTV (a), TLG (b) and OS with TLG (c). The pseudo 95% confidence interval (CI) was computed as part of the analysis to produce the funnel plots and corresponded to the expected 95% CI for a given standard error (SE). HR indicates hazard ratio. PFS = progression-free survival, OS = overall survival, MTV = metabolic tumor volume, TLG = total lesion glycolysis. . (Supplementary Materials)

References

B. Freddie, F. Jacques, S. Isabelle, R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, and A. Jemal, “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 394–424, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Major Cancer Sites, Cancer Facts & Figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2012-2014Contents Overview 1, 2014.
C. John, G. Dorothy, and G. Peter, “The IASLC lung cancer staging project: the new database to inform the eighth edition of the TNM classification of lung cancer,” Journal of Thoracic Oncology Official Publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, vol. 9, no. 11, pp. 1618–1624, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Al-Sarraf, K. Gately, J. Lucey, R. Aziz, K. Doddakula, and L. Wilson, “Clinical implication and prognostic significance of standardised uptake value of primary non-small cell lung cancer on positron emission tomography: analysis of 176 cases,” European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Therapy, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 892–897, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Moon, S. H. Hyun, and J. Y. Choi, “Prognostic significance of volume-based PET parameters in cancer patients,” Korean Journal of Radiology, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Arslan, T. Miller, F. Dehdashti, R. Battafarano, and B. Siegel, “Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy by quantitative 2-deoxy-2-[F]Fluoro-D-Glucose with positron emission tomography in patients with esophageal cancer,” Molecular Imaging and Biology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 301–310, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. K. Rahim, S. E. Kim, H. So et al., “Recent trends in PET image interpretations using volumetric and texture-based quantification methods in nuclear oncology,” Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Davison, G. Mercier, G. Russo, and R. M. Subramaniam, “PET-based primary tumor volumetric parameters and survival of patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma,” American Journal of Roentgenology, vol. 200, no. 3, pp. 635–640, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zhu, D. Lee, and H. Shim, “Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response,” Seminars in Oncology, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 55–69, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Zhang, K. Wroblewski, D. Appelbaum, and Y. Pu, “Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer,” International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 181–191, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Jing, D. Min, X. Sun, W. Li, and J. Yu, “Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgical non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis,” PLoS One, vol. 11, no. 1, Article ID e0146195, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
H. J. Im, K. Pak, and G. J. Cheon, “Prognostic value of volumetric parameters of 18F-FDG PET in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 42, no. 2, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Melloni, A. M. S. Gajate, S. Sestini et al., “New positron emission tomography derived parameters as predictive factors for recurrence in resected stage I non-small cell lung cancer,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 39, no. 11, pp. 1254–1261, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Shrestha, T. Higuchi, K. Shirai, A. Tokue, and Y. Tsushima, “Prognostic significance of semi-quantitative FDG-PET parameters in stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 47, no. 6, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. H. Hyun, J. Y. Choi, K. Kim et al., “Volume-based parameters of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography improve outcome prediction in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer after surgical resection,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 257, no. 2, pp. 364–370, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. C. Vu, R. Matthews, B. Kim, D. Franceschi, T. V. Bilfinger, and W. H. Moore, “Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis from 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients undergoing stereotactic body radiation therapy for stage I non-small-cell lung cancer,” Nuclear Medicine Communications, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 959–963, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Moher, A. Liberati, J. Tetzlaff, D. G. Altman, and P. Tugwell, “Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement,” Revista Española de Nutrición Humana y Dietética, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 172–181, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
K. Pak, G. J. Cheon, H.-Y. Nam et al., “Prognostic value of metabolic tumor volume and total lesion glycolysis in head and neck cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 884–890, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Zhao, Y. Feng, X. Mao, and M. Qie, “Prognostic value of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography or PET-computed tomography in cervical cancer: a meta-analysis,” International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 1184–1190, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yu, H.-T. Men, Z.-M. Niu et al., “Meta-analysis of circulating endothelial cells and circulating endothelial progenitor cells as prognostic factors in lung cancer,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 16, no. 14, pp. 6123–6128, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. H. Kim, J.-K. Yoon, D. K. Kang et al., “Value of volume-based metabolic parameters for predicting survival in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy,” Medicine, vol. 95, no. 41, Article ID e4605, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Yin, W. Y. Lin, C. H. Kao, K. Y. Yen, and J. J. Yeh, “Prognostic value of preoperative metabolic tumor volumes on PET-CT in predicting disease-free survival of patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer,” Anticancer Research, vol. 32, no. 11, p. 5087, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
J. A. Abelson, J. D. Murphy, N. Trakul et al., “Metabolic imaging metrics correlate with survival in early stage lung cancer treated with stereotactic ablative radiotherapy,” Lung Cancer, vol. 78, no. 3, pp. 219–224, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Domachevsky, D. Groshar, R. Galili, M. Saute, and H. Bernstine, “Survival prognostic value of morphological and metabolic variables in patients with stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer,” European Radiology, vol. 25, no. 11, pp. 3361–3367, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
S. Y. Park, A. Cho, W. S. Yu et al., “Prognostic value of total lesion glycolysis by 18F-FDG PET/CT in surgically resected stage IA non-small cell lung cancer,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine Official Publication Society of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 56, no. 1, pp. 45–49, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K.-P. Chang, N.-M. Tsang, C.-T. Liao et al., “Prognostic significance of 18F-FDG PET parameters and plasma Epstein-Barr virus DNA load in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 21–28, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Maffione, S. Chondrogiannis, C. Capirci et al., “Early prediction of response by 18F-FDG PET/CT during preoperative therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review,” European Journal of Surgical Oncology, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 1186–1194, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-H. Hsu and C.-H. Shih, “Positron emission tomography (PET) in oncology,” 科儀新知., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 39–44, 2011.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Boellaard, R. Delgado-Bolton, W. J. G. Oyen, F. Giammarile, and K. Tatsch, “FDG PET/C.T.: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0,” European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 328–354, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
M. M. Graham, R. L. Wahl, J. M. Hoffman et al., “Summary of the UPICT protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging in oncology clinical trials,” Journal of Nuclear Medicine, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 955–961, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Weibo Wen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

332

Downloads

895

Citations