Exendin-4 Exacerbates Burn-Induced Morbidity in Mice by Activation of the Sympathetic Nervous System

Ji, Xiao-Jing; Hao, Ji-Wei; Li, Guang-Lei; Dong, Ning; Wang, Xin-Qi; Zhou, Min; Zhang, Qing-Hong; Yao, Yong-Ming

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2750528

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion Conclusions Abbreviations Data Availability Ethical Approval Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2019 | Article ID 2750528 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/2750528

Exendin-4 Exacerbates Burn-Induced Morbidity in Mice by Activation of the Sympathetic Nervous System

Xiao-Jing Ji,¹Ji-Wei Hao,¹Guang-Lei Li,¹Ning Dong,¹Xin-Qi Wang,¹Min Zhou,²Qing-Hong Zhang,¹and Yong-Ming Yao¹

Academic Editor: Daniela Caccamo

Received10 Jul 2018

Revised19 Nov 2018

Accepted05 Dec 2018

Published17 Jan 2019

Abstract

Background. Although glucagon-like peptide 1- (GLP-1-) based therapy of hyperglycemia in burn injury has shown great potential in clinical trials, its safety is seldom evaluated. We hypothesize that exendin-4, a GLP-1 analogue, might affect the immune response via the activation of the sympathetic nervous system in burn injury. Methods. Male Balb/c mice were subjected to sham or thermal injury of 15% total body surface area. Exendin-4 on T cell function in vitro was examined in cultured splenocytes in the presence of β-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol (1 nmol/L) or GLP-1R antagonist exendin (9-39) (1 μmol/L), whereas its in vivo effect was determined by i.p. injection of exendin-4 (2.4 nmol/kg) in mice. To further elucidate the sympathetic mechanism, propranolol (30 mg/kg) or vehicle was applied 30 min prior to injury. Results. Although the exacerbated burn-induced mortality by exendin-4 was worsened by propranolol pretreatment, the inhibition of T cell proliferation by exendin-4 in vitro could be restored by propranolol instead of exendin (9-39). However, a Th2 switch by exendin-4 in vitro could only be reversed by exendin (9-39). Likewise, the inhibition of splenic T cell function and NFAT activity by exendin-4 in vivo was restored by propranolol. By contrast, the increased splenic NF-κB translocation by exendin-4 in vivo was potentiated by propranolol in sham mice but suppressed in burn mice. Accordingly, propranolol abrogated the heightened inflammatory response in the lung and the accelerated organ injuries by exendin-4 in burn mice. On the contrary, a Th2 switch and higher serum levels of inflammatory mediators by exendin-4 were potentiated by propranolol in burn mice. Lastly, exendin-4 raised serum stress hormones which could be remarkably augmented by propranolol. Conclusions. Exendin-4 suppresses T cell function and promotes organ inflammation through the activation of the sympathetic nervous system, while elicits Th2 switch via GLP-1R in burn injury.

1. Introduction

Incretin-based therapies including glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) and its analogues in the management of acute hyperglycemia with improved glucose tolerance in critical illness [1–6], e.g., burn injury [7–9], have shown great potential in clinical trials. However, the evaluation of its safety concerns in critically care especially the inflammatory response is extremely limited [10]. Accumulating studies, albeit controversial, have suggested that GLP-1 be associated with inflammatory response. Although reduced plasma GLP-1 level was found in burn-injured rats [9], increased serum GLP-1 secretion was observed in patients with acute and chronic inflammatory processes such as sepsis [11], chronic kidney disease [11], as well as in mice under inflammatory stimuli [12]. Actually, GLP-1 receptor (GLP-1R) mRNA transcripts were detected in the lymphocytes from nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice [13], in the invariant natural killer T cells (iNKT) from the psoriasis patients [14], and in the macrophages from normal mice [15]. Furthermore, it has been suggested that GLP-1 exerts an inhibitory effect on the immune system. In adaptive immunity, GLP-1 analogue exendin-4 (Ex-4) could increase the number of CD4⁺CD8⁺ T cells in the lymph nodes [13] and pancreas [16], but could inhibit the migration of human CD4⁺ T cells [17]. Moreover, it could reduce the frequency of regulatory T cells (Tregs) in the thymus [13, 18], but it could increase in the spleen with a trend of enhanced suppression ability [19]. Ex-4 therapy could decrease the frequency of iNKT cells in psoriasis patients [14], but could activate them in diabetic patients and obese mice [20]. The immunosuppressive effect of Ex-4 was also demonstrated by its reduction of cytokine production from intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte in mice [21, 22] and from peripheral blood mononuclear cells in diabetic patients [23]. In innate immunity, Ex-4 confers an anti-inflammatory effect [22] by increasing IL-10 expression in the peripheral blood and pancreas [16]. Meanwhile, it downregulated TNF-α and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) in macrophages [15] and in the airway of asthma mice [24] through inactivation of nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) [15]. Additionally, it reduced monocyte/macrophage accumulation in the arterial wall [15] and adipocytes [25] in mice.

Furthermore, as a neuropeptide released from both the brain and the intestine, GLP-1 could activate the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) both peripherally and centrally. In human, infusion of GLP-1 significantly increased sympathetic activity systemically [26, 27] or locally in muscle [28]. In rats, acute administration of high doses of Ex-4 either peripherally or centrally could also elicit a SNS response with an increased urine level of epinephrine metabolite [29]. Notably, central GLP-1R activation could increase the expression of dopamine-β-hydroxylase, a key enzyme in noradrenaline synthesis in the brain of mice [30, 31], and significantly increase sympathetic nerve activity in the peripheral lipid in mice [32]. However, plasma catecholamine was suppressed substantially in diabetic individuals after a 2-week treatment with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, which significantly raised plasma GLP-1 level [33], indicating that the effect of GLP-1 on the SNS was an acute event.

Increasing evidence suggests that the SNS be involved in the modulation of the cellular immune system via adrenoceptor-dependent mechanism [34, 35]. It was reported that T cell activation be modulated by norepinephrine [36], and the abnormality of a subset of CD4⁺ T cell was associated with SNS hyperactivity [37]. In an animal model of stroke, an extensive apoptotic loss of lymphocytes and Th2 shift was mediated by catecholamine [38]. Moreover, targeting the β-adrenoceptor (β-AR) on lymphocytes leads to inhibition of inflammatory cytokine production, lymphocyte killing [39], and CD4⁺ T lymphocyte proliferation [40]. Intriguingly, ample evidence showed that trigging β2-ARs could intersect with the NF-κB signaling cascade at different levels in a cell type and gene-specific manner [41]. Regarding the inflammatory response, SNS activation induced by stress or injury led to monocytic IL-10 release [42], IL-6 production in normal skin [43], myelopoiesis [44], and chemotaxis of monocytes [45]. Propranolol (Prop) is a nonselective β-AR antagonist that mitigates the catecholamine response associated with burns. However, results on the immunomodulatory role of β-blockade from burn injury [46, 47] and sepsis [48, 49] are mixed.

Although GLP-1 and its analogues have shown great potential in managing hyperglycemia in critical illness, literature remains sparse as to the immunomodulatory property of Ex-4 in critical illness. Likewise, few studies have passed out the indirect effect of SNS stimulation by Ex-4 versus direct effect via GLP-1R-cAMP stimulation on immune response. We thereby pursued the GLP-1 action on the immune response and the underlying SNS-dependent mechanism in thermal-injured mice. We now demonstrate that T cell function, organ inflammation, and organ injury are controlled by exogenous Ex-4 in a SNS-dependent manner, whereas T cell differentiation and systemic inflammation are promoted by Ex-4 via GLP-1R activation. Elucidation of its potential mechanism for immunoregulation of GLP-1R agonist in critical illness would help to avoid the side effect of incretin-based therapy [50].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Thermal Injury Model

Male Balb/c mice (20-25 g, Huafukang Bioscience Co. Inc., Beijing, China) were acclimatized for one week before exposed to 94°C thermal injury for 8 seconds of 15% total body surface area (TBSA) after anesthetized with diethyl ether as previously reported [51]. Sham-injured mice were subjected to all of the procedures except the bath that was 37°C. Mice received 1.0 mL Ringer’s solution subcutaneously immediately after injury for fluid resuscitation. A topical antibacterial agent (iodine tincture) was applied on the wound. The mice were caged individually with warm bedding in a temperature and humidity controlled room with 12 h light and 12 h darkness. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Animals were sacrificed, between 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 a.m. by cervical dislocation. Analgesics were not used owning to the profound immunosuppressive effects of opiates. All experimental manipulations were undertaken in accordance with the National Institutes of Health Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, with the approval of the Scientific Investigation Board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

2.2. Experimental Designs

For ex vivo study, aliquots of 4 × 10⁵ splenocytes separated from both sham and burn mice 24 h following injury were cultivated in the presence of T cell mitogen concanavalin A (5 mg/L; ConA, Sigma, MD, USA) in 96-well plates containing 200 μL/well of complete RMPI 1640 medium at 37°C with a humidified 5% CO₂/air atmosphere. Consecutive concentrations of Ex-4 (E7144; 0.3-30 nmol/L, Sigma) [15] were added into the medium with or without propranolol hydrochloride (1 nmol/L; Prop, P8688, Sigma) [42] or exendin (9-39) (1 μmol/L; Ex-9, E7269, Sigma, MD, USA) pretreatment for 1 h [21].

For in vivo study, the burn mice were separated into four subgroups: vehicle, Ex-4, Ex-4 plus Prop, and Prop (/subgroup). Peripheral adrenoceptor blockade with Prop (30 mg/kg) [52] or vehicle (sterile 0.01 M PBS) was commenced intraperitoneally (i.p.) 30 min before injury. Then, 15%TBSA thermal injury was carried out followed by i.p. injection of Ex-4 (2.4 nmol/kg, Sigma) [53] or vehicle 30 min after injury [15, 54]. Thereafter, animals were left in home cages with water and food freely, and the survival rates were documented at 4 h intervals until 7 days. In another set of experiment, both the sham and burn mice were separated into four subgroups as above (/subgroup) and underwent the same procedures. They were killed at 6 h and 24 h (/group/time point), respectively, and after injury, blood and tissues were collected as follows.

2.3. Blood and Tissue Collection

Blood was drained from the posterior orbital vein of ether-anesthetized mice into the tubes containing with or without 10 μL heparin at 6 h and 24 h after injury. The samples were centrifuged at 1000 for 10 min at 4°C. In the meantime, another investigator simultaneously removed the spleen and lung. All tissue samples were flash frozen on liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C.

2.4. Separation of Splenocyte and Purification of T Cells

The spleens were harvested 24 h after injury and put into ice-cold RPMI1640 culture media. Splenocyte suspensions were obtained by flushing through 70 μm mesh (BD Biosciences, Beijing, China) with a syringe and were purified in lysis buffer (Applygen Technologies Inc.) to remove the red cells. Cell suspensions were then washed and resuspended in complete culture medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum). Cells were then allowed to adhere on a plastic Petri dishes (10 mm in diameter, BD Biosciences) at cells/mL for 2 h to remove the adherent myeloid cells at 37°C in a 5% CO₂. Nonadherent cells, mainly the lymphocytes, were resuspended in complete culture medium and used in subsequent studies [40, 55, 56]. To determine the purity of nonadherent lymphocytes, separated cells in staining buffer (1% BSA in 0.01 M PBS) were incubated with PE-anti-mouse CD3ε (2.5 μg/100 μL, cat. 100307, BioLegend, CA, USA) for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed with 2 mL staining buffer and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 5 min at 4°C before analyzed on a FACScan cytometer (BD, Franklin Lakes, New Jersey, USA).

2.5. Immunofluorescence of GLP-1R on T Cells

Sections with purified CD3⁺ T cells were fixed in 4% polyformaldehyde for 20 min and were blocked in 3% bovine serum albumin (BSA, Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature and stained overnight at 4°C with GLP-1R antibody (1 : 100; sc-66911, Santa Cruz, USA) and rat anti-mouse CD3 (1 : 100; eBioscience, USA) in PBS including 1% BSA. After washed 3 times with PBS, sections were incubated in DyLight™ 549-conjugated AffiniPure goat anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgG (H+L) antibodies (1 : 200; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, USA) for 2 h at room temperature in dark box. Slides were rinsed and coverslips were affixed with VECTASHIELD mounting medium containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) for nucleus staining (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA). Control experiments were performed with unspecific isotype antibodies of rabbit instead of the primary antibody. Fluorescent cell images were obtained on a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM 700, Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Jena, Germany).

2.6. Analysis of T Cell Function and Differentiation

Splenocytes were cultured in complete medium stimulated by ConA (5 mg/L, Sigma) for 48 h. Cell-free supernatant fractions were collected and stored at -80°C until cytokines analysis by ELISA (ExCell Biology Inc., Shanghai, China). T cell differentiation was represented by Th1 cytokine secretion of IFNγ and Th2 cytokine secretion of IL-4. T cell function was represented by cell proliferation using a CCK-8 method (Dojindo Molecular Technologies Inc., Shanghai, China) in a multiplate spectrophotometer (Spectra MR; Dynex, Richfield, MN, USA) and IL-2 secretion by ELISA (ExCell Biology Inc.).

2.7. Measurement of NFATc1 Activation in T Cells and NF-κB Activation in Splenocytes

The calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFATc1) is activated upon T cell receptor activation followed by intracytoplasmatic calcium influx [57] and subsequent nuclear translocation [58]. Nuclear extracts from purified lymphocytes of both groups at 6 h and 24 h postburn were prepared using a nuclear extraction kit as described (Applygen Technologies Inc.). The proteins were submitted to NFATc1 analysis by ELISA with 10 μL per well (2-10 μg/well) as instructed (Active Motif, CA, USA). Protein content was determined by bicinchoninic acid assay (Applygen Technologies Inc.).

For NF-κB p65 analysis, nuclear protein of splenocyte (50 μg/lane) from both groups at 6 h and 24 h postburn was separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in Mini-PROTEAN® Tetra electrophoresis cell (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) and transferred onto Immobilon-P polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, MA, USA) by Mini Trans-Blot® Electrophoretic Transfer Cell (Bio-Rad). PVDF membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the NF-κB p65 antibody (1 : 1000; cat. 6956, Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA) followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1 : 5000; Cell Signaling Technology, MA, USA). The blots were exposed to the super signal luminescence reagent (Applygen Technologies Inc.), and the signals were scanned by ImageQuant LAS 4000 (GE Healthcare, Germany). Then, the membranes were stripped and reprobed with lamin B1 antibody (1 : 1000; AB133741, Abcam, MA, USA) and the signals were scanned again. NF-κB p65 densitometry was calculated by ImageJ software, normalized to lamin B1.

2.8. Cytokines, Hormones, and Biochemistry

Lung tissues 24 h after injury were emulsified with a mechanical homogenizer (Kimble Inc., NJ, USA) in a lysis buffer (0.5% Triton with 1% PMSF in 0.01 M PBS) and subjected to two rounds of freeze thaw. After being incubated at 4°C for 1 h, the homogenate was centrifuged and the supernatants were collected. The data were expressed at pg/mg protein.

Serum samples collected 24 h after injury were subjected to cytokines measurement by ELISA (ExCell Biology Inc., Shanghai, China). Serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate transaminase (AST), urea, and creatinine were measured by commercial kits (Roche, USA) in the clinical laboratory of our hospital. Serum and plasma samples collected at 6 h and 24 h after injury were for stress hormone measurement by ELISA (Jiancheng Life Sciences, Nanjing, China).

2.9. Statistical Analysis

All data are expressed as group mean ± SEM. A value of was considered significant for all analyses. The survival rate in the life table was analyzed by the Wilcoxon test. Duration of survivals has been presented as Kaplan-Meier curves with the log-rank tests comparing equality of strata. The significance of difference among groups was evaluated by the Student’s -test for two groups or one-way ANOVA with a post hoc LSD test for multiple comparisons when comparing three or more groups.

3. Results

3.1. Ex-4 Deteriorated Burn-Induced Mortality Independent of the SNS

The survival rate analyzed by life table revealed marginally difference in the survival rate among the groups with burn injury (Wilcoxon, , Figure 1(a)). The overall 1-week survival rate was 84.6% for single burn-injured mice (PBS), 76.9% for Ex-4-treated burn mice, 60% for Ex-4 with Prop pretreatment, and 57.7% for single Prop pretreatment. Ex-4 tended to deteriorate the survival rate of burn injury but did not reach its significance (Ex-4 vs. PBS, ). Single pretreatment of Prop could significantly deteriorate the survival rate of burn injury (Prop vs. PBS, ), when in combination of Ex-4, the survival rate was further worsened (Ex-4+Prop vs. PBS, ).

(a)

(b)

However, there was a significant difference in the mean survival time among the groups with burn injury (log-rank test, , Figure 1(b)) as analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves. Although the mean survival time was comparable between Ex-4-treated and vehicle mice ( vs. , ), Prop pretreatment could significantly reduce burn-induced survival in PBS-treated (Prop: , vs. PBS) and Ex-4-treated mice (Ex-4+Prop vs. PBS: vs. , ). Intriguingly, there was no difference of the survival time between single Prop pretreatment and that in combination with Ex-4 application (Prop vs. Ex-4+Prop: vs. , ).

3.2. Ex-4 In Vitro Affects T Cell Function via β-AR, While Its Differentiation via GLP-1R

The purity of the adherence isolated CD3⁺ T cells was between 73% and 93%, as verified by flow cytometry (Figure 2(a)). Among these, 96% CD3⁺ T cells isolated and enriched from normal mouse splenocyte demonstrated GLP-1R-positive expression (Figure 2(b)), indicating possible direct effect of Ex-4 on T cells.

(a)

(b)

(c)

Figure 2

Expression of GLP-1R and its function in T cells. (a) The purified murine CD3⁺ (green) T cells were stained with rabbit anti-mouse GLP-1R antibody (red) and further detected by DyLight™ 549-conjugated goat anti-rabbit or mouse IgG. T cells incubated with control IgG did not show nonspecific binding. Nuclei are labeled with DAPI. (b) Flow cytometry of purified T cells by staining with CD3⁺ antibody. (c) T cell function and differentiation were analyzed by culturing splenocytes with ConA in the presence of PBS (ctrl), low (0.3 nmol/L, Ex-L), moderate (3 nmol/L, Ex-M), and high concentration (30 nmol/L, Ex-H) of Ex-4 with or without Prop (1 nmol/L) or exendin (9-39) (Ex-9) (1 μmol/L) pretreatment. T cell proliferation and secretions of IL-2, IL-4, and IFNγ were presented. Data are mean ± SEM (/group). The differences between the groups were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. vs. PBS and vs. Ex-M, by post hoc LSD analysis in one-way ANOVA or Student’s -test.

Burn injury resulted in reduced T cell proliferation and IL-2 secretion significantly (Figure 2(c)). To make things worse, Ex-4 (0.3-30 nmol/L) in vitro could suppress T cell proliferation in sham (P ≤ 0.001, one-way ANOVA) and burn mice (, one-way ANOVA). Additionally, the effect of Ex-4 on T cell proliferation was dependent on β-AR, as Prop pretreatment could restore the inhibitory effects of Ex-M on cell proliferation in both groups. Unexpectedly, blocking GLP-1R by competitive antagonist Ex-9 could further potentiate the inhibitory effects of Ex-M on cell proliferation (Figure 2(c)), indicating that Ex-4 did not act on GLP-1R to inhibit T cell function. Nevertheless, Ex-4 could not affect IL-2 secretion significantly in splenic T cell from both groups of mice, except that Ex-9 in combination with Ex-M could moderately increase IL-2 secretion in sham mice.

Regarding T cell differentiation, burn injury could elicit a Th2-type response with higher IL-4 secretion and lower IFNγ secretion (Figure 2(c)). Furthermore, Ex-4 could provoke both Th1- and Th2-type responses by increasing IL-4 secretion in sham (, one-way ANOVA) and burn-injured mice (, one-way ANOVA), whereas increasing IFNγ secretion in sham (, one-way ANOVA) and burn-injured mice (, one-way ANOVA). The increased secretions of IL-4 instead of IFNγ induced by Ex-4 could be reversed by Prop pretreatment in burn cells ( vs. PBS, Student’s -test) other than in sham cells ( vs. PBS, Student’s -test), indicating Th2 differentiation promoted by Ex-4 might be dependent on β-AR. Propranolol alone could inhibit T cell proliferation mildly, but promote both IFNγ and IL-4 secretions from both groups significantly. On the contrary, GLP-1R blockade by Ex-9 could reverse the increased IL-4 levels by Ex-M in both groups of cells (burn and sham: and vs. PBS, Student’s -test) (Figure 2(b)). The increased IFNγ level by Ex-M could only be reversed by Ex-9 in cells from sham mice ( vs. PBS).

3.3. Ex-4 In Vivo Inhibited T Cell Function in Burn Mice SNS Dependently, Whereas Promoted Th2 Switch SNS Independently

Compared to the sham mice, thermal injury could result in less spleen cellularity and impaired splenic T cell function with suppressed proliferation and less IL-2 secretion (Figures 3(a)–3(c)). Consistent with the in vitro findings, Ex-4 in vivo (2.4 nmol/kg) could exert profound effect on T cell function and differentiation in both groups of mice. In detail, in sham mice, Ex-4 could mildly enhance spleen cellularity (Figure 3(a)) and T cell proliferation (Figure 3(b)), but could inhibit IL-2 secretion (Figure 3(c)), all of which could be prevented by Prop pretreatment. Even so, Ex-4 could not exert any effect on T cell differentiation (Figures 3(d)–3(f)) in sham mice in vivo. On the contrary, in burn mice, Ex-4 reduced spleen cellularity and suppressed T cell proliferation and IL-2 secretion which was also restored by Prop pretreatment (Figures 3(a)–3(c)). Additionally, Ex-4 promoted T cell toward Th2-type response in burn mice, which was further potentiated by Prop pretreatment (Figures 3(d)–3(f)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.4. Ex-4 Augmented Inflammatory Response in Burn Mice SNS Dependently

Although 15% TBSA thermal injury could not initiate higher TNF-α and IL-10 levels in the lung or serum, it did promote MCP-1 secretion significantly in both compartments (Figure 4). Anyway, Ex-4 exerted distinct effect on cytokine secretions between sham and burn mice. In sham mice, a bolus of Ex-4 could not exert any effect on proinflammatory cytokines in the lung 24 h following injury (Figures 4(a)–4(c)); however, it could reduce the serum TNF-α level at this time (Figures 4(d)–4(f)). Regarding the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10, Ex-4 could also reduce its level in serum rather than in the lung in sham mice, which could be restored marginally but significantly by Prop pretreatment (Figures 4(c) and 4(f)). Unexpectedly, in burn mice, Ex-4 profoundly promoted both pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine secretions in both the lung and serum. However, the proinflammatory effect of Ex-4 was only reversed by Prop pretreatment in the lung (Figures 4(b) and 4(c)). To make things worse, they were further potentiated by Prop pretreatment in serum (Figures 4(d)–4(f)). This mixed data suggested that the induction of both the pro- or the anti-inflammatory cytokines by Ex-4 be constituent specific in burn mice and was SNS-dependent locally in organ, e.g., the lung, other than systemically in serum.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

3.5. Ex-4 Inhibited NFATc1 Activity in CD3⁺ T Cells while Promoted NF-κB Translocation in Splenocytes SNS Dependently

As opposed to that from sham mice, nuclear NFATc1 activity in purified T cells was increased in burn mice 6 h (Figure 5(a)) following injury, but was profoundly suppressed at 24 h postburn (Figure 5(b)). Although Ex-4 did not affect NFATc1 activation in T cells from sham-injured mice after 6 h in vivo treatment, it could significantly suppress its activity in burn-injured mice compared to that in vehicle-treated burn-injured mice. The suppression by Ex-4 could be restored by Prop pretreatment (Figure 5(a)). Over the time, the suppressed NFATc1 activity from Ex-4-treated mice was comparable to that from vehicle-treated burn mice since the NFATc1 activity was generally suppressed in burn-injured mice at 24 h postburn (Figure 5(b)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

On the other hand, nuclear NF-κB p65 translocation in splenocytes as shown by Western blot (Figure 5(e)) was robustly increased in burn as opposed to sham mice 6 h following injury (Figure 5(c)) followed by a reduction to the comparable level as the sham mice 24 h postburn (Figure 5(d)). Application of Ex-4 could promote nuclear NF-κB p65 translocation in splenocytes from both groups at 6 h and 24 h following injury (Figures 5(c) and 5(d)), which could be reversed by Prop pretreatment. Except that in sham T cells, the increased nuclear NF-κB p65 promoted by Ex-4 was further potentiated by Prop pretreatment at 6 h postburn (Figure 5(c)).

3.6. Ex-4 Deteriorated the Organ Injury SNS Dependently

As expected, burn injury could profoundly augment the biomarkers for liver injury, e.g., ALT and AKT, and moderately exacerbate the biomarker for kidney injury, e.g., urea at 24 h postburn. Although Ex-4 did not do any harm to the liver in sham mice, it could raise AKT level in burn mice which could be reversed by Prop pretreatment. Regarding the ALT/AST ratio, it could be potentiated by Ex-4 SNS dependently in burn mice. In terms of kidney injury, Ex-4 could significantly raise the levels of urea and creatinine in burn rather than in sham mice. Again, the increased urea/creatinine ratio by Ex-4 was reversed by Prop pretreatment in burn mice, reinforcing the sympathetic mechanism for Ex-4 in accelerating the multiple organ syndromes in burn injury (MODS) (Table 1).

3.7. The Increased Serum Norepinephrine by Ex-4 Was Potentiated by Prop Pretreatment

Considering the robust activation of the SNS by Ex-4 as referred [27–29, 32], we next sought to determine the stress hormone levels in both the plasma and the serum. To our interest, the hormone profile was different between the two constituents, serum (Figure 6(a)) and plasma (Figure 6(b)). Hormone levels were ten times higher in plasma than in serum in both groups. As expected, burn injury could increase hormone levels in plasma, but neither Ex-4 nor Prop, or in combination, could affect their levels at 6 h postburn, whereas at 24 h postburn, only Ex-4 in combination with Prop could reliably increase the plasma hormone levels relative to PBS controls (Figure 6(a)).

(a)

(b)

Paradoxically, serum levels of hormones were profoundly lower in burn-injured mice compared to that in sham-injured mice at 6 h postburn (Figure 6(b)). Again in sham mice, Ex-4 exerted no significant effect on serum levels of hormones at both time points. However, 6 h after burn injury, injection of Ex-4 could significantly reduce the serum levels of corticosterone and epinephrine, whereas increase serum level of norepinephrine. Comparatively, pronounced serum levels of all the three hormones were observed in Ex-4-treated mice that with Prop pretreatment. At 24 h after injury, the decreased levels of serum hormones in burn mice gradually recovered, but were still lower than those in sham mice. At this time, a bolus of Ex-4 could not exert any effect on serum hormones in both sham and burn mice (Figure 6(b)).

4. Discussion

This study illustrates for the first time that modulation of the SNS by Ex-4 might deteriorate the morbidity of thermal-injured mice; however, the exacerbated mortality by Ex-4 was not dependent on the activation of the SNS by Ex-4. These data suggest that Ex-4 might regulate T cell function through two distinct pathways in burn injury. First, exogenous Ex-4 directly suppresses splenic T cell function after burn injury depending on SNS activation. Secondly, exogenous Ex-4 acts as a Th2 switch signal for splenic T cells via GLP-1R, which is further potentiated by SNS blockade. That is, Th2 switch by Ex-4 was independent on SNS activation. Removal of these two immunosuppressive functions of Ex-4 by Prop resulted in an improved T cell function with elevated NFATc1 activity, reduced splenic nuclear NF-κB translocation, and consequent alleviated lung inflammation in burn-injured mice. However, Ex-4-induced Th2 switch was further potentiated by Prop pretreatment with increased systemic levels of both pre- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Therefore, the immunosuppressive effects of Ex-4 likely override its anti-inflammatory actions in burn injury, resulting in suppressed T cell function in contrast with heightened inflammatory response in response to Ex-4 in burn injury.

We found the fluorescent GLP-1R on CD3⁺ T cell, suggesting that GLP-1 or its analogue Ex-4 could exert direct effect on T cells. As expected, Ex-4 could inhibit T cell function from sham and burn mice in vitro depending on β-AR, whereas promoted Th2 switch via the activation of GLP-1R.The distinct effects between T cell function and differentiation indicated that the two events be driven by two different pathways. Preclinical studies have provided conflicting results about the effect of Ex-4 on lymphocyte function. It was reported that Ex-4 in vitro could not affect the proliferation of primary thymocytes, splenocytes, lymph node cells [59], or splenic T cells from NOD mice [13]; however, it could increase the number of CD4⁺CD8⁺ T cells in lymph nodes in vivo [13] that leading to extensive lymphocytic infiltration [60]. Moreover, while Ex-4 (3-50 nM) in vitro reduced the production of cytokines from activated intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte, acute exendin-4 administration in vivo robustly induced the expression of genes encoding cytokines and chemokines in the normal and injured intestine [21]. These mixed data including ours suggested that the immunomodulatory effect of Ex-4 be cell type, constituent, and immune status specific.

Considering the potency of Ex-4 in neuroendocrine activation, we went on to examine the stress hormones after Ex-4 application. Although the plasma levels of stress hormones were shortly elevated in burn as opposed to sham mice owing to the increased sympathetic tone in our study, Ex-4 could not affect the plasma levels of hormones neither in sham nor in burn mice. It has been found that GLP-1 alone could not elevate plasma catecholamine in humans or in humans during exercise [27]; however, GLP-1 in combination with 2-adrenergic antagonist yohimbine could increase plasma norepinephrine levels in humans [28]. Preclinical study also found that short-term intracerebroventricular Ex-4 could increase urinary content of catecholamine metabolites in rats, indicating a direct activation of the SNS by Ex-4 [29]. This discrepancy prompted us to further examine the levels of hormones in serum, which reflects the rapid changes of hormones. Contrary to those in plasma, the hormones in serum were ten times lower in burn mice than that in sham mice. Nonetheless, it was intriguing to find that Ex-4 could elevate the serum level of norepinephrine but could reduce those of epinephrine and corticosterone in burn mice. Additionally, Prop pretreatment could greatly elevate all hormone levels as a result of β-AR blockade that prevented the hormones from binding to the receptor, so the hormones were accumulated in the serum.

Then, we wonder whether Ex-4 could modulate T cell immunity via a neuroendocrine pathway. As expected, the alterations of T cell function by Ex-4 could be reversed by Prop pretreatment in both groups, indicating a SNS-dependent mechanism. In accordance, Ex-4-treated burn mice exhibited reduced cellularity of the spleen which could be restored by Prop pretreatment. It has been reported that the spleen atrophy observed in stroke may result from immune cell migration from the spleen to the cerebral injury site [52]. In our observation, the reduced spleen cellularity in Ex-4-treated burn mice indicated an increased immune cell emigration that from the spleen to the circulation, which possibly evoking an even more severe systemic inflammatory response. Moreover, studies have shown that products of the SNS, namely, epinephrine and norepinephrine, can alter the balanced expression of cytokines from Th1 in favor of Th2 in vitro [61]. Coinciding with the literature, the increased ratio of IL-4/IFNγ by Ex-4 or in combination with Prop relative to vehicle-treated burn mice was possibly due to the elevated levels of serum norepinephrine in these mice.

Actually, increased levels of cytokines from both the lung and serum were identified in Ex-4-treated as opposed to vehicle-treated mice at 24 h postburn. However, only the increased cytokines by Ex-4 in the lung other than those in the serum could be reversed by Prop pretreatment in burn mice, reinforcing an organ-exclusive SNS-dependent effect of Ex-4. To make things worse, the increased serum levels of cytokines by Ex-4 were further potentiated by Prop pretreatment, indicating a SNS-independent effect of Ex-4 in systemic immune response. It could be explained by the compartment effect of immune response that results in distinct inflammatory response among different tissues and organs, even different segments of the intestine [62]. Following the same line of evidence, splenic nuclear NF-κB was consistently upregulated in Ex-4-treated burn mice compared to that in vehicle-treated burn mice depending on β-AR. These unexpected findings were not consistent with the consensus regarding the anti-inflammatory effect of Ex-4 in vitro [15] and in vivo [21, 22]. This paradox could be possibly attributed to the synergetic activation of the SNS by Ex-4 in burn injury. The increased serum level of norepinephrine by Ex-4 or in combination with Prop could account for the heightened systemic inflammation. Previous studies found that the neuroendocrine system activated by a 20% TBSA burn injury participates in the increased IL-6 production in the unburned skin [43]. The enhanced systemic inflammation induced by Ex-4 in burn-injured mice could be the organ- and tissue-specific differences in catecholamine stimulation, which may merely depend on regional changes in blood flow [63]. Secondly, this discrepancy could also be attributed by the difference between the acute and the chronic animal models. Consistent with our findings, acute application of Ex-4 peripherally could increase IL-6 and TNF-α proteins in the jejunum of mice 4 h following injection [21], and central application of Ex-4 potently increased the expressions of IL-6 and IL-1β mRNA in the brain 90 min following injection [64]. The third possibility could be that the outcome of β2-AR/NF-κB interactions in the context of NF-κB-driven gene expression can be either positive or negative depending on the cell type and the context [41]. Several clinical reports showed that elevated levels of catecholamine and the therapeutic β-blockers for severe burn injury be associated with enhanced production of inflammatory mediators [65–67] and the exacerbated hepatic inflammatory response [68] in burn patients. In our study, although TNF-α release was not significantly induced by 15% TBSA burn injury, MCP-1 level was greatly elevated, indicating an inflammatory response evoked. In the meanwhile, plasma stress hormone levels were greatly raised in this animal model. In this context, Ex-4 could induce higher levels of TNF-α, IL-10, and MCP-1 in burn mice either alone or in combination with Prop pretreatment. It is possible that the genes for these cytokines undergo synergistic expression upon coactivation of β2-ARs and NF-κB pathway by catecholamine in the setting of burn injury.

Another two critical issues should be mentioned in our study. One is that the hormones in serum were significantly lower than that in plasma. It is asserted that serum differs from plasma only in lacking of the fibrinogen and the clotting factors [69]. The circulating steroid hormones were bound specifically to the large carrier proteins and are in equilibrium with a small fraction (less than 1%) in free solution in plasma. It is possible that the large part of the bound hormone in plasma was removed by clotting, leaving the small part of the unbound free hormone in serum. Secondly, the unbound hormones that are thought to reach the sites of biological action were further degraded [70], leading to an exhausted sympatho-adrenomedullary system following burn injury. The two events resulted in lower levels of stress hormone in serum than that in the plasma. Another issue is that Ex-4 conferred distinct effects on immune response between sham and burn mice. It could be the enhanced neuroendocrine activation in burn relative to sham-injured mice. It has been reported that neither exogenous GLP-1 nor GLP-1R antagonist altered any index of hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) axis activity in unstressed rats; however, GLP-1 could adjust HPA sensitivity to chronic stress [71]. Likewise, in our study, although Ex-4 conferred no influence on serum levels of hormone in sham mice, it could raise serum level of norepinephrine in burn-injured mice, suggesting that GLP-1 system be involved in central pathways responsible for SNS activation in burn injury.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we have demonstrated a novel aspect of neural suppression of immune response by Ex-4, namely, T cell function, an effect that was robust and distinct between sham- and burn-injured mice. Our results showed that a response to GLP-1R activation be mediated by the SNS that could suppress splenic T cell function accompanied by more pronounced inflammation and severe organ injuries. However, systemic inflammation was augmented by application of GLP-1R agonist, independently on SNS activation. Taken together, our findings raise important considerations for incretin-based therapy of stress or infection-induced hyperglycemia and whether those immunoregulatory effects could be related to adverse effects of drugs with GLP-1R activity.

Abbreviations

GLP-1:	Glucagon-like peptide 1
Ex-4:	Exendin-4
NF-κB:	Nuclear factor kappa B
SNS:	Sympathetic nervous system
TBSA:	Total body surface area
NOD:	Nonobese diabetic mice
Tregs:	Regulatory T cells
iNKT:	Invariant natural killer T cells
MCP-1:	Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1
GLP-1R:	GLP-1 receptor
β-AR:	β-Adrenoreceptor
Prop:	Propranolol
ConA:	Concanavalin A
NFATc1:	Calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T cells
Ex-9:	Exendin (9-39)
DAPI:	4,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole
BSA:	Bovine serum albumin
PVDF:	Polyvinylidene difluoride
ALT:	Alanine aminotransferase
AST:	Aspartate transaminase
NFATc1:	Calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T cells
i.p.:	Intraperitoneally
CNS:	Central nervous system
MODS:	Multiple organ syndrome
HPA:	Hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon request.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Scientific Investigation Board of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ Contributions

QHZ did the conception and design of the study, supervision of the experiments, interpretation of the data, draft of the manuscript and figures, and final approval of the paper. XJJ and JWH did all the experiments and acquisition and analysis of all the data. GLL helped to conduct the experiments. ND and XQW helped with the flow cytometry. MZ had a critical advice on the manuscript. YMY provided part of the fund and the personnel.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81272089 and 81730057) and the Innovation Project for Military Scientific Foundation (18CXZ044).

References

A. M. Deane, M. J. Chapman, R. J. L. Fraser, C. Burgstad, L. K. Besanko, and M. Horowitz, “The effect of exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 on the glycaemic response to small intestinal nutrient in the critically ill: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled cross over study,” Critical Care, vol. 13, no. 3, p. R67, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Deane, M. J. Summers, A. V. Zaknic et al., “Exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 attenuates the glycaemic response to postpyloric nutrient infusion in critically ill patients with type-2 diabetes,” Critical Care, vol. 15, no. 1, p. R35, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Deane, M. J. Chapman, R. J. L. Fraser et al., “Effects of exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 on gastric emptying and glucose absorption in the critically ill: relationship to glycemia,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 38, no. 5, pp. 1261–1269, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Galiatsatos, B. R. Gibson, A. Rabiee et al., “The glucoregulatory benefits of glucagon-like peptide-1 (7-36) amide infusion during intensive insulin therapy in critically ill surgical patients: a pilot study,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 638–645, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Miller, A. M. Deane, M. P. Plummer et al., “Exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 attenuates glucose absorption and reduces blood glucose concentration after small intestinal glucose delivery in critical illness,” Critical Care and Resuscitation, vol. 19, pp. 37–42, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
S. T. Nielsen, R. Krogh-Madsen, and K. Moller, “Glucose metabolism in critically ill patients: are incretins an important player?” Journal of Intensive Care Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 201–208, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. A. Mecott, D. N. Herndon, G. A. Kulp et al., “The use of exenatide in severely burned pediatric patients,” Critical Care, vol. 14, no. 4, p. R153, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Watada, Y. M. Yu, A. J. Fischman et al., “Evaluation of intragastric vs intraperitoneal glucose tolerance tests in the evaluation of insulin resistance in a rodent model of burn injury and glucagon-like polypeptide-1 treatment,” Journal of Burn Care & Research, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. e66–e72, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Shen, S. Fagan, A. J. Fischman et al., “Effects of glucagon-like peptide 1 on glycemia control and its metabolic consequence after severe thermal injury--studies in an animal model,” Surgery, vol. 149, no. 5, pp. 635–644, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. R. Pinelli, M. C. Jones, L. M. Monday, Z. Smith, and D. H. Rhoney, “Exogenous glucagon-like peptide-1 for hyperglycemia in critically ill patients,” The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 124–129, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lebherz, G. Schlieper, J. Möllmann et al., “GLP-1 levels predict mortality in patients with critical illness as well as end-stage renal disease,” The American Journal of Medicine, vol. 130, no. 7, pp. 833–841.e3, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Kahles, C. Meyer, J. Mollmann et al., “GLP-1 secretion is increased by inflammatory stimuli in an IL-6-dependent manner, leading to hyperinsulinemia and blood glucose lowering,” Diabetes, vol. 63, no. 10, pp. 3221–3229, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Hadjiyanni, L. L. Baggio, P. Poussier, and D. J. Drucker, “Exendin-4 modulates diabetes onset in nonobese diabetic mice,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 3, pp. 1338–1349, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Hogan, A. M. Tobin, T. Ahern et al., “Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) and the regulation of human invariant natural killer T cells: lessons from obesity, diabetes and psoriasis,” Diabetologia, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 2745–2754, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Arakawa, T. Mita, K. Azuma et al., “Inhibition of monocyte adhesion to endothelial cells and attenuation of atherosclerotic lesion by a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, exendin-4,” Diabetes, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 1030–1037, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. He, C. Lian, Y. Fang, J. Wu, H. Zhou, and X. Ye, “The influence of exendin-4 intervention on -obese diabetic mouse blood and the pancreatic tissue immune microenvironment,” Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 2893–2898, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Marx, M. Burgmaier, P. Heinz et al., “Glucagon-like peptide-1(1-37) inhibits chemokine-induced migration of human CD4-positive lymphocytes,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 67, no. 20, pp. 3549–3555, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. A. Sherry, W. Chen, J. A. Kushner et al., “Exendin-4 improves reversal of diabetes in NOD mice treated with anti-CD3 monoclonal antibody by enhancing recovery of β-cells,” Endocrinology, vol. 148, no. 11, pp. 5136–5144, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Xue, C. H. Wasserfall, M. Parker et al., “Exendin-4 therapy in NOD mice with new-onset diabetes increases regulatory T cell frequency,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1150, no. 1, pp. 152–156, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Lynch, A. E. Hogan, D. Duquette et al., “iNKT cells induce FGF21 for thermogenesis and are required for maximal weight loss in GLP1 therapy,” Cell Metabolism, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 510–519, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. Yusta, L. L. Baggio, J. Koehler et al., “GLP-1R agonists modulate enteric immune responses through the intestinal intraepithelial lymphocyte GLP-1R,” Diabetes, vol. 64, no. 7, pp. 2537–2549, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
O. Yanay, A. L. Bailey, K. Kernan, J. J. Zimmerman, and W. R. Osborne, “Effects of exendin-4, a glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist, on neutrophil count and inflammatory cytokines in a rat model of endotoxemia,” Journal of Inflammation Research, vol. 8, pp. 129–135, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. He, C. K. Wong, K. K. T. Cheung et al., “Anti-inflammatory effects of exendin-4, a glucagon-like peptide-1 analog, on human peripheral lymphocytes in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Journal of Diabetes Investigation, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 382–392, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Zhu, X. L. Wu, W. Zhang, and M. Xiao, “Glucagon like peptide-1 (GLP-1) modulates OVA-induced airway inflammation and mucus secretion involving a protein kinase A (PKA)-dependent nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling pathway in mice,” International Journal of Molecular Sciences, vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 20195–20211, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Lee, M. S. Park, J. S. Choung et al., “Glucagon-like peptide-1 inhibits adipose tissue macrophage infiltration and inflammation in an obese mouse model of diabetes,” Diabetologia, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2456–2468, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. M. Smits, M. H. A. Muskiet, L. Tonneijck et al., “Exenatide acutely increases heart rate in parallel with augmented sympathetic nervous system activation in healthy overweight males,” British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 613–620, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Y. H. Khoo, J. Wallis, K. Tsintzas, I. A. Macdonald, and P. Mansell, “Effects of exenatide on circulating glucose, insulin, glucagon, cortisol and catecholamines in healthy volunteers during exercise,” Diabetologia, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 139–143, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. E. Bharucha, N. Charkoudian, C. N. Andrews et al., “Effects of glucagon-like peptide-1, yohimbine, and nitrergic modulation on sympathetic and parasympathetic activity in humans,” American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, vol. 295, no. 3, pp. R874–R880, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Perez-Tilve, L. Gonzalez-Matias, B. A. Aulinger et al., “Exendin-4 increases blood glucose levels acutely in rats by activation of the sympathetic nervous system,” American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism, vol. 298, no. 5, pp. E1088–E1096, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Yamamoto, C. E. Lee, J. N. Marcus et al., “Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor stimulation increases blood pressure and heart rate and activates autonomic regulatory neurons,” The Journal of Clinical Investigation, vol. 110, no. 1, pp. 43–52, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. E. Richard, R. H. Anderberg, A. Goteson, F. M. Gribble, F. Reimann, and K. P. Skibicka, “Activation of the GLP-1 receptors in the nucleus of the solitary tract reduces food reward behavior and targets the mesolimbic system,” PLoS One, vol. 10, no. 3, article e0119034, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Nogueiras, D. Perez-Tilve, C. Veyrat-Durebex et al., “Direct control of peripheral lipid deposition by CNS GLP-1 receptor signaling is mediated by the sympathetic nervous system and blunted in diet-induced obesity,” The Journal of Neuroscience, vol. 29, no. 18, pp. 5916–5925, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Yabe, T. Eto, M. Shiramoto et al., “Effects of DPP-4 inhibitor linagliptin and GLP-1 receptor agonist liraglutide on physiological response to hypoglycaemia in Japanese subjects with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, open-label, 2-arm parallel comparative, exploratory trial,” Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 442–447, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Dinarello and E. Abraham, “Does blocking cytokines in sepsis work?” American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, vol. 166, no. 9, pp. 1156-1157, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. M. Sanders, “The beta2-adrenergic receptor on T and B lymphocytes: do we understand it yet?” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 195–200, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. M. Abboud, S. C. Harwani, and M. W. Chapleau, “Autonomic neural regulation of the immune system: implications for hypertension and cardiovascular disease,” Hypertension, vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 755–762, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Tian, R. Guo, Y. Zhang, L. Xu, X. Liu, and Y. Hou, “Effects of the sympathetic nervous system on regulatory T cell and T helper 1 chemokine expression in patients with acute coronary syndrome,” Neuroimmunomodulation, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 168–178, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Prass, C. Meisel, C. Höflich et al., “Stroke-induced immunodeficiency promotes spontaneous bacterial infections and is mediated by sympathetic activation reversal by poststroke T helper cell type 1-like immunostimulation,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 198, no. 5, pp. 725–736, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zalli, J. A. Bosch, O. Goodyear et al., “Targeting ss2 adrenergic receptors regulate human T cell function directly and indirectly,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 45, pp. 211–218, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Riether, A. Kavelaars, T. Wirth et al., “Stimulation of β2-adrenergic receptors inhibits calcineurin activity in CD4+ T cells via PKA–AKAP interaction,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 59–66, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Kolmus, J. Tavernier, and S. Gerlo, “β2-Adrenergic receptors in immunity and inflammation: stressing NF-κB,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 45, pp. 297–310, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Woiciechowsky, K. Asadullah, D. Nestler et al., “Sympathetic activation triggers systemic interleukin-10 release in immunodepression induced by brain injury,” Nature Medicine, vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 808–813, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Kawakami, J. He, T. Sakamoto, and Y. Okada, “Catecholamines play a role in the production of interleukin-6 and interleukin-1α in unburned skin after burn injury in mice,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 796–801, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. D. Powell, E. K. Sloan, M. T. Bailey et al., “Social stress up-regulates inflammatory gene expression in the leukocyte transcriptome via β-adrenergic induction of myelopoiesis,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 41, pp. 16574–16579, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. H. Straub, M. Mayer, M. Kreutz, S. Leeb, J. Scholmerich, and W. Falk, “Neurotransmitters of the sympathetic nerve terminal are powerful chemoattractants for monocytes,” Journal of Leukocyte Biology, vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 553–558, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Muthu, J. Deng, F. Romano et al., “Thermal injury and sepsis modulates beta-adrenergic receptors and cAMP responses in monocyte-committed bone marrow cells,” Journal of Neuroimmunology, vol. 165, no. 1-2, pp. 129–138, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Jeschke, W. B. Norbury, C. C. Finnerty, L. K. Branski, and D. N. Herndon, “Propranolol does not increase inflammation, sepsis, or infectious episodes in severely burned children,” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 676–681, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Schmitz, K. Wilsenack, S. Lendemanns, M. Schedlowski, and R. Oberbeck, “β-Adrenergic blockade during systemic inflammation: impact on cellular immune functions and survival in a murine model of sepsis,” Resuscitation, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 286–294, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. J. Loftus, P. A. Efron, L. L. Moldawer, and A. M. Mohr, “β-Blockade use for traumatic injuries and immunomodulation,” Shock, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 341–351, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Dubois-Laforgue, D. Boutboul, D. J. Levy, D. Joly, and J. Timsit, “Severe acute renal failure in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. e53–e55, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. H. Zhang, Q. Chen, J. R. Kang et al., “Treatment with gelsolin reduces brain inflammation and apoptotic signaling in mice following thermal injury,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 118, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. T. Ajmo Jr., L. A. Collier, C. C. Leonardo et al., “Blockade of adrenoreceptors inhibits the splenic response to stroke,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 218, no. 1, pp. 47–55, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Hayes, K. P. Skibicka, and H. J. Grill, “Caudal brainstem processing is sufficient for behavioral, sympathetic, and parasympathetic responses driven by peripheral and hindbrain glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptor stimulation,” Endocrinology, vol. 149, no. 8, pp. 4059–4068, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Harkavyi, A. Abuirmeileh, R. Lever, A. E. Kingsbury, C. S. Biggs, and P. S. Whitton, “Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor stimulation reverses key deficits in distinct rodent models of Parkinson’s disease,” Journal of Neuroinflammation, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 19, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Aziz, W. L. Yang, S. Matsuo, A. Sharma, M. Zhou, and P. Wang, “Upregulation of GRAIL is associated with impaired CD4 T cell proliferation in sepsis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 192, no. 5, pp. 2305–2314, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chakravarti, A. A. Marceau, L. Flamand, and P. E. Poubelle, “Normal human primary CD4+ T lymphocytes synthesize and release functional osteoprotegerin in vitro,” Laboratory Investigation, vol. 88, no. 2, pp. 171–184, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Reppert, E. Zinser, C. Holzinger, L. Sandrock, S. Koch, and S. Finotto, “NFATc1 deficiency in T cells protects mice from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 45, no. 5, pp. 1426–1440, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. J. Martinez, R. M. Pereira, T. Äijö et al., “The transcription factor NFAT promotes exhaustion of activated CD8(+) T cells,” Immunity, vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 265–278, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
I. Hadjiyanni, K. A. Siminovitch, J. S. Danska, and D. J. Drucker, “Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor signalling selectively regulates murine lymphocyte proliferation and maintenance of peripheral regulatory T cells,” Diabetologia, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 730–740, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. L. Baggio, D. Holland, J. Wither, and D. J. Drucker, “Lymphocytic infiltration and immune activation in metallothionein promoter-exendin-4 (MT-exendin) transgenic mice,” Diabetes, vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 1562–1570, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. N. Salicru, C. F. Sams, and G. D. Marshall, “Cooperative effects of corticosteroids and catecholamines upon immune deviation of the type-1/type-2 cytokine balance in favor of type-2 expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 21, no. 7, pp. 913–920, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Mowat and W. W. Agace, “Regional specialization within the intestinal immune system,” Nature Reviews Immunology, vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 667–685, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. L. Berk, J. F. Hagen, W. H. Beyer, M. J. Gerber, and G. R. Dochat, “The treatment of endotoxin shock by beta adrenergic blockade,” Annals of Surgery, vol. 169, no. 1, pp. 74–81, 1969.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Shirazi, V. Palsdottir, J. Collander et al., “Glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor induced suppression of food intake, and body weight is mediated by central IL-1 and IL-6,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 110, no. 40, pp. 16199–16204, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Jeschke, R. P. Mlcak, C. C. Finnerty et al., “Burn size determines the inflammatory and hypermetabolic response,” Critical Care, vol. 11, no. 4, p. R90, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. S. Friese, R. Barber, D. McBride, J. Bender, and L. M. Gentilello, “Could beta blockade improve outcome after injury by modulating inflammatory profiles?” The Journal of Trauma, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 1061–1068, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. G. Jeschke, G. G. Gauglitz, G. A. Kulp et al., “Long-term persistance of the pathophysiologic response to severe burn injury,” PLoS One, vol. 6, no. 7, article e21245, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Aninat, P. Seguin, P. N. Descheemaeker, F. Morel, Y. Malledant, and A. Guillouzo, “Catecholamines induce an inflammatory response in human hepatocytes,” Critical Care Medicine, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 848–854, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Arthur and J. E. H. Guyton, “Blood types; transfusion; tissue and organ transplantation,” in Textbook of Medical Physiology, G. R. Philadelphia, Ed., p. 460, Elsevier Inc., 11th edition, 2006.
View at: Google Scholar
H. M. Goodman, Basic Medical Endocrinology, Elsevier Inc., Philadelphia, 3rd edition, 2003.
M. Tauchi, R. Zhang, D. A. D'Alessio, R. J. Seeley, and J. P. Herman, “Role of central glucagon-like peptide-1 in hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocortical facilitation following chronic stress,” Experimental Neurology, vol. 210, no. 2, pp. 458–466, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2019 Xiao-Jing Ji et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

891

Downloads

921

Citations

Mediators of Inflammation

Exendin-4 Exacerbates Burn-Induced Morbidity in Mice by Activation of the Sympathetic Nervous System

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Animals and Thermal Injury Model

2.2. Experimental Designs

2.3. Blood and Tissue Collection

2.4. Separation of Splenocyte and Purification of T Cells

2.5. Immunofluorescence of GLP-1R on T Cells

2.6. Analysis of T Cell Function and Differentiation

2.7. Measurement of NFATc1 Activation in T Cells and NF-κB Activation in Splenocytes

2.8. Cytokines, Hormones, and Biochemistry

2.9. Statistical Analysis

3. Results

3.1. Ex-4 Deteriorated Burn-Induced Mortality Independent of the SNS

3.2. Ex-4 In Vitro Affects T Cell Function via β-AR, While Its Differentiation via GLP-1R

3.3. Ex-4 In Vivo Inhibited T Cell Function in Burn Mice SNS Dependently, Whereas Promoted Th2 Switch SNS Independently

3.4. Ex-4 Augmented Inflammatory Response in Burn Mice SNS Dependently

3.5. Ex-4 Inhibited NFATc1 Activity in CD3+ T Cells while Promoted NF-κB Translocation in Splenocytes SNS Dependently

3.6. Ex-4 Deteriorated the Organ Injury SNS Dependently

3.7. The Increased Serum Norepinephrine by Ex-4 Was Potentiated by Prop Pretreatment

4. Discussion

5. Conclusions

Abbreviations

Data Availability

Ethical Approval

Conflicts of Interest

Authors’ Contributions

Acknowledgments

References

Copyright

3.5. Ex-4 Inhibited NFATc1 Activity in CD3⁺ T Cells while Promoted NF-κB Translocation in Splenocytes SNS Dependently