M2c Macrophages Protect Mice from Adriamycin-Induced Nephropathy by Upregulating CD62L in Tregs

Lu, Junyu; Lv, Shengqiu; Pang, Jielong; Qin, Tao; Yang, Yegui; Lu, Weisheng; Li, Zhengzhao; Yang, Geng; Zhang, Jianfeng

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1153300

Mediators of Inflammation

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods and Materials Discussion Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments Supplementary Materials References Copyright Related Articles

Special Issue

The Role of Inflammation Mediators in Neurological Diseases

View this Special Issue

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 1153300 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1153300

M2c Macrophages Protect Mice from Adriamycin-Induced Nephropathy by Upregulating CD62L in Tregs

Junyu Lu,¹Shengqiu Lv,¹Jielong Pang,²Tao Qin,¹Yegui Yang,¹Weisheng Lu,¹Zhengzhao Li,²Geng Yang,¹and Jianfeng Zhang²

Academic Editor: Feng Zhang

Received27 Jul 2022

Revised28 Aug 2022

Accepted12 Sept 2022

Published10 Oct 2022

Abstract

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) and M2c macrophages have been shown to exert potentially synergistic therapeutic effects in animals with adriamycin-induced nephropathy (AN), a model chronic proteinuric renal disease. M2c macrophages may protect against renal injury by promoting an increase in the number of Tregs in the renal draining lymph nodes of AN mice, but how they do so is unclear. In this study, we used an AN mouse model to analyze how M2c macrophages induce the migration of Tregs. Using flow cytometry, we found that M2c macrophages promoted the migration of Tregs from the peripheral blood to the spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal draining lymph nodes. At the same time, M2c macrophages significantly upregulated chemokine receptors and adhesion molecule in Tregs, including CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CXCR5, and CD62L. Treating AN mice with monoclonal anti-CD62L antibody inhibited the migration of M2c macrophages and Tregs to the spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal draining lymph nodes. Taken together, our results suggest that M2c macrophages upregulate CD62L in Tregs and thereby promote their migration to inflammatory sites, where they exert renoprotective effects. These insights may aid the development of treatments against chronic kidney disease.

1. Introduction

Chronic kidney disease has been recognized as a major public health problem. It presents a worldwide prevalence of 8-16% and a complex pathogenesis, for which effective treatment options are lacking [1–3]. The indicators of chronic kidney disease include albuminuria, urine sediment abnormalities, abnormal renal imaging findings, altered levels of electrolyte or acid-base balance in serum, and glomerular filtration rate slower than 60 mL/minute/1.73 m [4, 5]. Currently, there is still a lack of effective treatments for chronic kidney disease, which causes extremely high mortality when it develops into end-stage renal failure, so there is an urgent need to develop effective treatments.

In recent years, studies have shown that cell-based therapies, including regulatory T cells (Tregs), can slow the progression of kidney disease. The migration of Tregs into the kidney can protect against acute and chronic injury [6, 7]. Moreover, Tregs can protect against autoimmune kidney disease and maintain tolerance to kidney transplantation [8–10]. Studies in mouse models have shown that Tregs induce tolerance to kidney transplantation by suppressing effector T cells and regulating dendritic cell function [9]. Kidney-infiltrating Tregs may help repair ischemic–reperfusion injury by negatively regulating proinflammatory cytokines produced by other T cells [11]. Tregs are a unique type of immunosuppressive cell in the immune system. Tregs are involved in the regulation of most immune responses and have important roles in many physiological processes and diseases, such as immune tolerance, autoimmune diseases, and tumors [12, 13]. A stable population of Tregs that can freely migrate to sites of inflammation or injury is important for managing immune responses [14–18]. Very low Tregs counts are associated with autoimmune or inflammatory diseases, while elevated Tregs numbers may lead to immunosuppression or tumorigenesis [16, 17]. In the noninflammatory state, Tregs are widely distributed in lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues to prevent the occurrence of abnormal immune or inflammatory activity. In the presence of inflammation, Tregs can express different adhesin and chemokine receptors, allowing them to home to different tissues and sites of inflammation, including secondary lymphoid organs, draining lymph nodes, and certain nonlymphoid tissues such as the skin and gut [14]. The removal of Tregs from noninflamed tissues can avoid pathological immune damage or tumor formation after excessive accumulation of Tregs [19]. Therefore, adoptive therapy of Tregs may be a potential therapy for renal injury.

Previous studies have shown that the development, maintenance, and functional specification of Tregs are regulated by multiple layers of factors, including antigenic and TCR signaling, cytokines, epigenetic modifiers, and transcription factors [20]. In addition, cell-extrinsic factors, such as nutrients, vitamins, and metabolites, as well as cell-intrinsic metabolic programs, also influence Tregs stability, plasticity, and tissue-specific heterogeneity [21]. For example, adenosine can increase the number of Tregs and further promote their immunomodulatory activity [22], and autocrine adenosine signaling can also promote Tregs-mediated renal protection [23]. Interestingly, it was found in a previous study that adoptive transfer of Tregs from healthy mice to kidney-injured mice helped restore the normal architecture of the injured kidney, and Tregs cocultured with M2c macrophages showed upregulation of chemokine receptors, which may be the mechanism by which M2C cells enhanced the migration of Tregs to inflammatory sites [24]. Macrophages are important regulators of tissue homeostasis [25], and the M1/M2 macrophage balance determines the fate of inflamed or injured organs [26, 27]. Alternatively activated macrophages (M2 phenotype), including M2a and M2c subsets, exhibit anti-inflammatory functions in vitro and protect against renal injury in vivo [28], and M2c macrophages are more potent than M2a macrophages in protecting against renal injury [29].

These findings highlight the need to understand how M2c macrophages regulate Tregs. Here, we explored this regulation in an adriamycin-induced nephropathy (AN) mouse model in an effort to clarify how M2c macrophages protect against kidney damage.

2. Methods and Materials

2.1. Animals and AN Model

In this study, 36 BALB/c male mice aged 4-6 weeks from the Guangxi Medical University Laboratory Animal Center were acclimated for one week under laboratory conditions of constant temperature () and relative humidity (%). Then, the mice were randomly divided into a control group (12 mice) and an AN group (24 mice). The AN mice were injected with 10.5 mg/kg of adriamycin (Haizheng, Taizhou, China) through the tail vein once, while the control group was injected with an equal volume of saline. The peripheral blood and kidney tissue of mice were collected 2 weeks after adriamycin injection, and each index was detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). These animals were included in the study if the indicators were consistent with manifestations of renal impairment; otherwise, they were excluded from the experiment. All procedures were approved by the Animal Ethics Committee of Guangxi Medical University (Nanning, China).

2.2. Cell Culture

Commercial cryopreserved mouse peritoneal M2c macrophages (Bluefbio, Shanghai, China) and mouse thymic Tregs (Bluefbio) were quickly thawed at 37°C in a sterile environment, centrifuged at 225 g for 5 min, and rinsed with medium containing 90% () Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium- (DMEM-) high glucose and 10% () fetal bovine serum with 1% penicillin-streptomycin solution (hereafter “complete DMEM”). Cells were washed twice with fresh medium, resuspended in complete DMEM, and then centrifuged again. Then, cells were resuspended in complete medium and expanded in culture for 2-3 days at 37°C in an incubator with an atmosphere of 5% CO₂.

2.3. Lentiviral Transfection

GFP- and RFP-LC3 lentiviruses (GenePharma, Shanghai, China) were used for lentiviral transfection. We diluted antibodies against mouse CD3e (catalog no. ab16669, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and mouse CD28 (ab203084; Abcam) in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to a final concentration of 5 μg/mL, then coated them onto otherwise untreated 24-well plates (500 μL per well). The coated wells were blocked with 500 μL of 1% bovine serum albumin. Tregs and M2c macrophages were resuspended in complete DMEM to a concentration of cells/mL, and 2 mL per well ( cells/well) was added to the antibody-coated plates. Cells were then placed in an incubator at 37°C for stimulation. After 48 h, activated Tregs and M2c macrophages were collected and resuspended in cell culture medium.

Then, 2- activated Tregs and M2c macrophages were added per well in 24-well plates precoated with anti-mouse CD3e and anti-mouse CD28 antibodies. Cells were gently mixed by pipetting after adding virus (10⁶/mL) at a multiplicity of . Plates were centrifuged at 1,000 g for 90 min at room temperature. After centrifugation, plates were placed in an incubator at 37°C for 6 h. Next, we carefully aspirated 350 μL of culture medium (70%), added 1.85 mL of complete cell culture medium up to a final volume of 2 mL, and mixed by pipetting. At 24 h after virus infection, the medium was carefully aspirated, and the virus operation was performed in the same plate. Cells were cultured at 37°C, and fluorescence was observed after 2-3 days using an Olympus IX71 fluorescence inverted microscope. Infection efficiency was measured by flow cytometry on a DXflex flow cytometer (Beckman, Fullerton, CA, USA).

2.4. Quantitative Reverse Transcription-Polymerase Chain Reaction (qRT-PCR)

M2c macrophages ( cells/mL) and Tregs ( cells/mL) in logarithmic growth phase were inoculated into 24-well plates and cocultured for 48 h at 37°C. The expression of chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules (CCR1-11, CXCR3, CXCR5, CX3CR1, CD62L, CD62E, and CD62P) was measured between M2c macrophage+Treg cocultures and Treg monocultures using qRT-PCR.

Total intracellular RNA was extracted using the Trizol extraction kit (Invitrogen), and cDNA was synthesized using the Thermo Scientific RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher) and the primers in Supplementary Table 1. qRT-PCR was performed using a real-time fluorescence quantitative PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems). The 2^-ΔΔCT method was used to analyze differences in expression of target genes between M2c macrophage+Treg cocultures and Treg monocultures. The housekeeping gene glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal reference.

2.5. Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay

Commercial ELISAs were used to assay, in the serum of AN and control mice, the levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS; Jingmeibio, Jiangsu, China), creatinine (Keshun, Shanghai, China), glutathione (Jianglai, Shanghai, China), urine protein (Jianglai), and blood urea nitrogen (ColorfulGene, Wuhan, China). We prepared standard curves and estimated the corresponding concentration of each analyte according to the optical density of the sample.

2.6. Hematoxylin-Eosin Staining

Paraformaldehyde-fixed mouse kidney tissues were embedded in a wax block and sectioned using a Leica DM2235. Tissue sections were immersed in xylene solution for 5 min twice. After hydration through a graded ethanol series, samples were immersed in hematoxylin staining solution. Finally, samples were placed in eosin staining solution for 2 min, and excess staining solution was washed away with 80% ethanol. Samples were dried with a filter paper, and an appropriate amount of neutral gum was quickly added dropwise. The coverslips were then mounted and analyzed on an OLYMPUS BX51 microscope.

2.7. Flow Cytometry Detection of Treg Migration in AN Mice

Twelve AN mice were randomly divided into a Tregs treatment group (six mice, each treated with Tregs) and M2c macrophage+Tregs treatment group (six mice, each treated with ). After intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the peripheral blood, spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal-draining lymph node tissues were collected, the blood was washed in PBS, and the different organs were cut into small pieces. Blood (0.5-1 mL) was collected from the mouse eyeball into EDTA-coated tubes, and 200 μL of anticoagulated whole blood was added to each sample tube. Erythrocyte lysate was diluted 1 : 10 with distilled water, and 2 mL of diluted lysate was added per 100 μL of whole blood, and lysis of the mixture was allowed to proceed for 8-12 min until the cell suspension became transparent. The suspension was centrifuged at 500 g for 5 min, the cells were washed, the cells were centrifuged again, and the supernatant was removed. The cells were resuspended with 500 μL of PBS, and flow cytometry was performed using a DXflex flow cytometer (Beckman).

2.8. Detection of Tregs Migration in AN Mice by Frozen Section

After intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the peripheral blood, spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal-draining lymph node tissues were collected, the blood was washed in buffer, and the different organs were cut into small pieces. Tissues were placed into a sample holder with OCT embedding glue and allowed to stand at 4°C for 5 min to allow the glue to penetrate the tissue. The sample holder containing the tissue blocks was placed in liquid nitrogen for 20 s. The blocks were sectioned in a cryostat into slices 5-10 μm thick. Slices were left standing at room temperature for 30 min, fixed in propionaldehyde for 5 min at 4°C, oven-dried for 20 min, and washed 3 times with PBS. Freezing and mounting were then performed using an aqueous mounting medium (CWBio) containing 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI).

2.9. Validation of the Regulation of Tregs Migration by M2c Macrophages via CD62L

The expression of CD62L in AN mice was inhibited by DREG-CD62L inhibitor (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA). Twelve AN mice were randomly divided into a Tregs treatment group and M2c macrophage+Tregs + DREG treatment group. After intraperitoneal injection of sodium pentobarbital, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation, and the peripheral blood, spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal-draining lymph node tissues were collected. The distribution of cell types in the circulation, spleen, thymus, kidney and renal-draining lymph nodes was compared between the two groups of mice using flow cytometry.

2.10. Statistical Analyses

Results were expressed as the , and intergroup differences were assessed for significance using tests. All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences associated with were considered statistically significant.

3. Result

3.1. Adriamycin Induced Nephropathy Mouse Model Showed Significant Renal Injury

The peripheral blood and kidney tissue of the mice were collected 2 weeks after adriamycin injection, and the indexes were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Compared with healthy mice, AN mice showed higher levels of ROS, creatinine, glutathione, urine protein, and blood urea nitrogen (Figure 1(a)), all typical indicators of renal injury. The renal tissues of AN mice showed obvious renal tubular atrophy and renal interstitial fibrosis, as well as increased levels of inflammation and apoptotic cells (Figure 1(b)). These results indicated that the renal injury mouse model was successfully constructed with adriamycin.

(a)

(b)

3.2. M2c Macrophages Promote Tregs Migration from the Blood to Different Sites

We hypothesized that M2c macrophages protect kidneys by regulating the migration of Tregs. We explored this hypothesis in an AN model. Flow cytometry was used to track the migration of Tregs to peripheral blood, spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal-draining lymph node tissue in AN mice that were injected with M2c macrophages+Tregs or Tregs. Numbers of Tregs in peripheral blood decreased gradually over time in animals treated with M2c macrophages+Tregs, and these numbers remained below the numbers in animals treated with either cell type on its own. Conversely, M2c macrophages and Tregs in the spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal-draining lymph nodes gradually increased over time in animals treated with Tregs, and the numbers remained higher than those in animals injected with M2c macrophages+Tregs (Figures 2(a)–2(e)). Immunofluorescence studies confirmed the gradual accumulation of Tregs in the spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal-draining lymph nodes in mice treated with M2c macrophages+Tregs (Figure 2(f)).

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 2

M2c macrophages promote the migration of Tregs from the blood to different sites. (a–e) Flow cytometry of Tregs in the blood, spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal draining lymph nodes in animals treated with Tregs or M2c macrophages+Tregs. (f) Immunofluorescence micrographs of Tregs in the blood, spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal draining lymph nodes in animals treated with Tregs or M2c macrophages+Tregs. FITC: fluorescein; GFP: green fluorescent protein; qRT-PCR: quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction; RFP: red fluorescent protein.

3.3. M2c Macrophages Promote Tregs Migration via Chemokine Receptors and Adhesion Molecules

To further explore how M2c macrophages regulate Tregs, we cultured mouse peritoneal M2c macrophages and thymic Tregs (Figure S1A) and fluorescently labeled them using recombinant lentivirus (Figure S1B). Then, we cocultured the two cell types and measured the levels of several chemokine receptors that regulate the migration and homing of Tregs.

The expression of chemokine receptors varied between Tregs monocultures and M2c macrophage+Tregs cocultures. Among the analyzed chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules, CCR2, CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CCR8, CCR10, CXCR3, CXCR5, and CD62L were significantly upregulated in cocultures, particularly CCR2, CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CXCR5, and CD62L (Figure 3(a)). M2c macrophages may act through these cytokines to promote the migration of Tregs.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Figure 3

Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (qRT-PCR) experiments confirmed that M2c macrophages promote the migration of Tregs via chemokines and their receptors. (a) Comparison of chemokine receptor expression between the Tregs-treated group and M2c macrophages+Tregs treatment group, based on qRT-PCR. (b–f) Chemokine receptor expression in the blood, spleen tissue, renal draining lymph nodes, kidney tissue, and thymus tissue from mice of normal control group, Tregs-treated group, and M2c macrophage+Tregs treatment group was compared based on qRT-PCR.

To supplement these in vitro observations, we examined levels of chemokine receptor expression in the blood of AN mice treated with M2c macrophages+Tregs or Tregs. In the peripheral blood and tissue samples, we found that several chemokines, especially CD62L, were upregulated in both the combined treatment group and the Tregs-treated group when compared with controls (Figures 3(b)–3(f) and S2).

3.4. M2c Macrophages Promote the Migration of Tregs from Blood to Different Tissues by Upregulating CD62L in Tregs

To verify whether M2c macrophages upregulate CD62L in Tregs to induce their migration, we examined animals injected with Tregs and animals injected with M2c macrophages+Tregs+DREG. Flow cytometry showed that numbers of Tregs in peripheral blood were higher in animals that received the combined injection than in animals injected only with Tregs. Conversely, numbers of Tregs in the spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal-draining lymph nodes were lower in the animals that received the combined injection than in animals injected only with Tregs (Figure 4), showing that downregulation of CD62L inhibited the migration of Tregs from peripheral blood to spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal drainage lymph nodes.

4. Discussion

Although medical technology has made progress in the treatment of kidney injury, effective ways to reverse the disease process are lacking. M2c macrophages and Tregs can protect the kidneys from initial damage and prevent the development of advanced fibrosis in several types of nephropathies, including ischemic kidney injury, diabetic nephropathy, cisplatin-induced kidney injury, AN kidney injury, and lupus glomerulonephritis [30–34]. However, recent studies have come to divergent conclusions about the efficacy and mechanism of M2c macrophages and Tregs in different renal disease models [35–37]. In the present study, we further explored how M2c macrophages protect against kidney injury using the AN mouse model. We first observed the migration of Tregs after treating AN mice with exogenous Tregs alone or in combination with M2c macrophages. We then explored changes in chemokine receptor expression and Tregs migration in AN mice following treatment with Tregs alone or combined with M2c macrophages.

In animal models, Tregs protect against kidney disease, and antibody-mediated depletion of Tregs worsens kidney disease in various models, including acute glomerulonephritis, doxorubicin nephropathy, ischemia-reperfusion injury, and kidney transplantation [38, 39]. Therefore, we speculate that M2c macrophages may protect against AN by regulating the migration of Tregs to injured tissue or organs. When we added exogenous M2c macrophages to mice, we observed that the number of exogenous Tregs in the blood decreased, while the number of Tregs in the spleen, draining lymph nodes, and kidney increased. M2c macrophages promoted the migration of Tregs from the blood into the spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal draining lymph nodes, and this migration was associated with upregulation of chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules such as CCR4, CCR5, CCR7, CXCR5, and CD62L in Tregs.

The role of these chemokine receptors has been reported in many previous studies. Chemokines and their receptors coordinate cell migration and homing in vivo [40, 41]. Locally expressed adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors mediate the migration of Tregs into inflammatory sites [42]. Among them, local injection of a CCR4 antagonist inhibits Tregs migration [43]. CCR5 regulates trafficking and effector functions in memory/effector T lymphocytes, macrophages, and immature dendritic cells [44, 45]. CCR7 can direct lymph node homing of Tregs through high endothelial venules [46, 47], while deficiency in CCR7 causes Tregs to localize abnormally, exacerbating acute nephritis [48]. Moreover, Tregs deficient in CCR7 lose their ability to migrate to lymph nodes and can no longer suppress immune or inflammatory processes [49, 50]. CXCR5-mediated signaling plays a central role in B cell trafficking in lymphoid tissues such as the spleen and lymph nodes [51]. These findings suggest that chemokine receptors promote the migration of Tregs. Additionally, CD62L regulates the ability of Tregs to home to sites of injury or inflammation and to suppress those responses [52]. CD62L and CCR7 also appear to be critical for Tregs migration to inflamed tissues [53]. Therefore, our results suggest that these chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules may help M2c macrophages recruit Tregs to renal tissue to alleviate or block renal injury.

We and others have reported several lines of evidence that CD62L is central to the ability of M2c macrophages to regulate Tregs migration to the kidney. In the present study, treating AN mice with anti-CD62L antibody DREG reduced Tregs migration to the spleen, thymus, kidney, and renal drainage lymph nodes. Consistent with our results, Tregs have been shown to expand more easily in culture and be more responsive to chemokine-driven migration to secondary lymphoid organs when they express CD62L than when they do not [54]. Adoptively transferred Tregs can protect mice against lethal acute graft-versus-host disease and autoimmunity only if they express CD62L [55]. Furthermore, CD62L-expressing Tregs exhibited excellent immunosuppressive effects in different disease models [54–57], and these results suggest the therapeutic potential of upregulating CD62L expression in Tregs for renal injury. In conclusion, our study suggests that M2c macrophages may exert renoprotective effects by upregulating CD62L expression of Tregs and mediating their migration to sites of inflammation, which may contribute to the development of therapeutic approaches for chronic kidney disease. Future studies should explore in detail how M2c macrophages upregulate CD62L in Tregs. Such work may help inform efforts to exploit the therapeutic potential of these macrophages and Tregs against chronic kidney injury, such as through adoptive transfer.

Data Availability

The data used to support the findings of this study are included within the article and are available from the corresponding authors upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, experiments, and data analysis were performed by Junyu Lu, Shengqiu Lv, Jielong Pang, Tao Qin, Yegui Yang, and Weisheng Lu. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Zhengzhao Li, Geng Yang, Jianfeng Zhang, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. Junyu Lu, Shengqiu Lv, and Jielong Pang contributed equally to this work and shared the first authorship.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Key Research & Development Program of Guangxi (GuiKeAB22080088), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81660132), the High-Level Medical Expert Training Program of Guangxi “139” Plan Funding (Grant No. G202003010), the Young Scientists Fund of the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province (Grant Nos. 2017GXNSFBA198043 and 2018GXNSFBA050069), and the Scientific Research Project of Guangxi Health Commission (Grant Nos. S2020012 and Z20190977).

Supplementary Materials

Figure 1: coculture of M2c macrophages and regulatory T cells (Tregs). Figure 2: chemokine expression measured by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). Table 1: sequences of primers for quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR). (Supplementary Materials)

References

J. C. Lv and L. X. Zhang, “Prevalence and disease burden of chronic kidney disease,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 1165, pp. 3–15, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Jha, G. Garcia-Garcia, K. Iseki et al., “Chronic kidney disease: global dimension and perspectives,” Lancet, vol. 382, no. 9888, pp. 260–272, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Liyanage, T. Ninomiya, V. Jha et al., “Worldwide access to treatment for end-stage kidney disease: a systematic review,” Lancet, vol. 385, no. 9981, pp. 1975–1982, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Y. Gaitonde, D. L. Cook, and I. M. Rivera, “Chronic kidney disease: detection and evaluation,” American Family Physician, vol. 96, no. 12, pp. 776–783, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
A. L. Ammirati, “Chronic Kidney Disease,” Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), vol. 66, Suppl 1, pp. s03–s09, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Alikhan, S. A. Summers, P. Y. Gan et al., “Endogenous toll-like receptor 9 regulates Aki by promoting regulatory T cell recruitment,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 706–714, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. W. Lai, K. C. Yong, and Y. H. Lien, “Pharmacologic recruitment of regulatory T cells as a therapy for ischemic acute kidney injury,” Kidney International, vol. 81, no. 10, pp. 983–992, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Kwan, S. J. Chadban, J. Ma, S. Bao, S. I. Alexander, and H. Wu, “Il-17 deficiency attenuates allograft injury and prolongs survival in a murine model of fully Mhc-mismatched renal allograft transplantation,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1555–1567, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Hu, C. Wang, G. Y. Zhang et al., “Infiltrating Foxp3+ regulatory T cells from spontaneously tolerant kidney allografts demonstrate donor-specific tolerance,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2819–2830, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Wang, G. Y. Zhang, M. Hu et al., “Cd8+ regulatory T cells induced by T cell vaccination protect against autoimmune nephritis,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1058–1067, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. T. Gandolfo, H. R. Jang, S. M. Bagnasco et al., “Foxp3+ regulatory T cells participate in repair of ischemic acute kidney injury,” Kidney International, vol. 76, no. 7, pp. 717–729, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Shao, J. Gu, J. Zhou et al., “Tissue Tregs and maintenance of tissue homeostasis,” Frontiers in Cell and Development Biology, vol. 9, p. 717903, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Sharma and D. Rudra, “Emerging functions of regulatory T cells in tissue homeostasis,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 9, p. 883, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. J. Campbell, “Control of regulatory T cell migration, function, and homeostasis,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 195, no. 6, pp. 2507–2513, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Arpaia, J. A. Green, B. Moltedo et al., “A distinct function of regulatory T cells in tissue protection,” Cell, vol. 162, no. 5, pp. 1078–1089, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Liston and D. H. Gray, “Homeostatic control of regulatory T cell diversity,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 154–165, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Papatriantafyllou, “Regulatory T Cells: Keeping the Numbers Steady,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 13, no. 9, pp. 618-619, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Cao, J. Lu, Q. Li et al., “Cd103+ dendritic cells elicit Cd8+ T cell responses to accelerate kidney injury in adriamycin nephropathy,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 1344–1360, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Ding, J. Xu, and J. S. Bromberg, “Regulatory T cell migration during an immune response,” Trends in Immunology, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 174–180, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Wang and W. Fu, “Transcriptional regulation of Treg homeostasis and functional specification,” Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, vol. 77, no. 21, pp. 4269–4287, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Shi and H. Chi, “Metabolic control of Treg cell stability, plasticity, and tissue-specific heterogeneity,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 10, p. 2716, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ohta and M. Sitkovsky, “Extracellular adenosine-mediated modulation of regulatory T cells,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 5, p. 304, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. R. Kinsey, L. Huang, K. Jaworska et al., “Autocrine adenosine signaling promotes regulatory T cell-mediated renal protection,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 1528–1537, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lu, J. Zhang, M. Chen, C. Chen, Z. Li, and P. Liao, “Regulatory T cells as a novel candidate for cell-based therapy in kidney disease,” Frontiers in Physiology, vol. 11, p. 621, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Arora, K. Dev, B. Agarwal, P. Das, and M. A. Syed, “Macrophages: their role, activation and polarization in pulmonary diseases,” Immunobiology, vol. 223, no. 4-5, pp. 383–396, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Shapouri-Moghaddam, S. Mohammadian, H. Vazini et al., “Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 233, no. 9, pp. 6425–6440, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. O. Martinez, A. Sica, A. Mantovani, and M. Locati, “Macrophage activation and polarization,” Frontiers in Bioscience, vol. 13, no. 13, pp. 453–461, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang, Y. P. Wang, G. Zheng et al., “Ex vivo programmed macrophages ameliorate experimental chronic inflammatory renal disease,” Kidney International, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 290–299, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Lu, Q. Cao, D. Zheng et al., “Discrete functions of M2a and M2c macrophage subsets determine their relative efficacy in treating chronic kidney disease,” Kidney International, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 745–755, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Tian and S. Y. Chen, “Macrophage polarization in kidney diseases,” Macrophage, vol. 2, no. 1, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Huen and L. G. Cantley, “Macrophages in renal injury and repair,” Annual Review of Physiology, vol. 79, no. 1, pp. 449–469, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Wang and D. C. Harris, “Macrophages in renal disease,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Sharma and G. R. Kinsey, “Regulatory T cells in acute and chronic kidney diseases,” American Journal of Physiology. Renal Physiology, vol. 314, no. 5, pp. F679–F698, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Alikhan, M. Huynh, A. R. Kitching, and J. D. Ooi, “Regulatory T cells in renal disease,” Clinical & Translational Immunology, vol. 7, no. 1, article e1004, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Cao, Y. Wang, D. Zheng et al., “Failed renoprotection by alternatively activated bone marrow macrophages is due to a proliferation-dependent phenotype switch _in vivo_,” Kidney International, vol. 85, no. 4, pp. 794–806, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. M. Tang, D. J. Nikolic-Paterson, and H. Y. Lan, “Macrophages: versatile players in renal inflammation and fibrosis,” Nature Reviews. Nephrology, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 144–158, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. S. Mederacke, F. W. Vondran, S. Kollrich et al., “Transient increase of activated regulatory T cells early after kidney transplantation,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1021, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Mahajan, Y. Wang, X. Qin et al., “Cd4+Cd25+ regulatory T cells protect against injury in an innate murine model of chronic kidney disease,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 10, pp. 2731–2741, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. M. Wang, G. Y. Zhang, Y. Wang et al., “Foxp3-transduced polyclonal regulatory T cells protect against chronic renal injury from adriamycin,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 697–706, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zlotnik and O. Yoshie, “Chemokines: a new classification system and their role in immunity,” Immunity, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 121–127, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Zlotnik and O. Yoshie, “The chemokine superfamily revisited,” Immunity, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 705–716, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
N. Zhang, B. Schröppel, G. Lal et al., “Regulatory T cells sequentially migrate from inflamed tissues to draining lymph nodes to suppress the alloimmune response,” Immunity, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 458–469, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Z. Chow, S. N. Mueller, J. A. Deane, and M. J. Hickey, “Dermal regulatory T cells display distinct migratory behavior that is modulated during adaptive and innate inflammation,” Journal of Immunology, vol. 191, no. 6, pp. 3049–3056, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Oppermann, “Chemokine receptor Ccr5: insights into structure, function, and regulation,” Cellular Signalling, vol. 16, no. 11, pp. 1201–1210, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. R. Balistreri, C. Caruso, M. P. Grimaldi et al., “Ccr5 receptor: biologic and genetic implications in age-related diseases,” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, vol. 1100, no. 1, pp. 162–172, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Forster, A. C. Davalos-Misslitz, and A. Rot, “Ccr7 and its ligands: balancing immunity and tolerance,” Nature Reviews. Immunology, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 362–371, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Sallusto, D. Lenig, R. Forster, M. Lipp, and A. Lanzavecchia, “Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions,” Nature, vol. 401, no. 6754, pp. 708–712, 1999.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Eller, T. Weber, M. Pruenster et al., “Ccr7 deficiency exacerbates injury in acute nephritis due to aberrant localization of regulatory T cells,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 42–52, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. S. Smigiel, E. Richards, S. Srivastava et al., “Ccr7 provides localized access to Il-2 and defines homeostatically distinct regulatory T cell subsets,” The Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 211, no. 1, pp. 121–136, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. L. Moschovakis and R. Forster, “Multifaceted activities of Ccr7 regulate T-cell homeostasis in health and disease,” European Journal of Immunology, vol. 42, no. 8, pp. 1949–1955, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. G. Cyster, K. M. Ansel, V. N. Ngo, D. C. Hargreaves, and T. T. Lu, “Traffic patterns of B cells and plasma cells,” Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol. 512, pp. 35–41, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Ryba, K. Rybarczyk-Kapturska, K. Zorena, M. Mysliwiec, and J. Mysliwska, “Lower frequency of Cd62l(high) and higher frequency of Tnfr2(+) Tregs are associated with inflammatory conditions in type 1 diabetic patients,” Mediators of Inflammation, vol. 2011, Article ID 645643, 7 pages, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. Mahnke, S. Ring, T. Bedke, S. Karakhanova, and A. Enk, “Interaction of regulatory T cells with antigen-presenting cells in health and disease,” Chemical Immunology and Allergy, vol. 94, pp. 29–39, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Fu, A. C. Yopp, X. Mao et al., “Cd4+ Cd25+ Cd62+ T-regulatory cell subset has optimal suppressive and proliferative potential,” American Journal of Transplantation, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 65–78, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Ermann, P. Hoffmann, M. Edinger et al., “Only the Cd62l+ subpopulation of Cd4+Cd25+ regulatory T cells protects from lethal acute Gvhd,” Blood, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 2220–2226, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Ivetic, H. L. Hoskins Green, and S. J. Hart, “L-selectin: a major regulator of leukocyte adhesion, migration and signaling,” Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 10, p. 1068, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Lange, M. Scholl, A. Melms, and F. Bischof, “CD62L^high Treg cells with superior immunosuppressive properties accumulate within the CNS during remissions of EAE,” Brain, Behavior, and Immunity, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 120–126, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Junyu Lu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

322

Downloads

443

Citations