Diabetic Retinopathy Is a Predictor of Progression of Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Gupta, Mansi; Rao, Indu Ramachandra; Nagaraju, Shankar Prasad; Bhandary, Sulatha V.; Gupta, Jayanti; Babu, Ganesh T. C.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3922398

International Journal of Nephrology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Methods Results Discussion Conclusion Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 3922398 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3922398

Diabetic Retinopathy Is a Predictor of Progression of Diabetic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mansi Gupta,¹Indu Ramachandra Rao,²Shankar Prasad Nagaraju,²Sulatha V. Bhandary,³Jayanti Gupta,⁴and Ganesh T. C. Babu¹

Academic Editor: Alexandra Scholze

Received10 Jan 2022

Accepted24 Mar 2022

Published29 Apr 2022

Abstract

Aims and Objectives. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the predictive value of diabetic retinopathy (DR) for progression of diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods. A systematic search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and the Google scholar for eligible studies through September 2021. The quality of selected articles was assessed using JBI checklist. Higgins and Thompson’s I² statistic was used to see the degree of heterogeneity. Based on degree of heterogeneity, fixed or random effects model was used to estimate pooled effect using inverse variance method. Results were expressed as hazard ratios and odds ratios with 95% CIs. Results. After scrutinizing 18017 articles, data from ten relevant studies (seven prospective and three retrospective) was extracted. DR was significantly associated with DKD progression with a pooled HR of 2.42 (95% CI: 1.70–3.45) and a pooled OR of 2.62 (95% CI: 1.76–3.89). There was also a significant association between the severity of DR and risk of progression of DKD with a pooled OR of 2.13 (95% CI: 1.82–2.50) for nonproliferative DR and 2.56 (95% CI: 2.93–.33) for proliferative DR. Conclusion. Our study suggests that presence of DR is a strong predictor of risk of kidney disease progression in DKD patients. Furthermore, the risk of DKD progression increases with DR severity. Screening for retinal vascular changes could potentially help in prognostication and risk-stratification of patients with DKD.

1. Introduction

The global burden of diabetes mellitus (DM) has been steadily rising over the past few decades. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) predicts an increase in the number of patients with diabetes to 643 million by 2030 and to 784 million by 2045 [1]. An estimated 30–50% of patients with diabetes will develop DKD during their lifetime [2]. DKD is, at present, the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) worldwide and causes significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare burden [3, 4]. Indeed, much of the cardiovascular death in diabetes appears to be closely related to the development of kidney disease [5, 6]. The prediction of DKD progression in patients with type 1 and type 2 DM represents an important clinical and public policy challenge.

DKD is often not recognized in the initial stages due to lack of routine screening for microalbuminuria, especially in low-resource settings. Clinicians are heavily reliant on serum creatinine and urine dipstick, both of which are flawed screening tools, and there is a paucity of validated biomarkers that can help in early detection of chronic kidney disease (CKD) [7]. There is also considerable heterogeneity in the natural history of DKD which makes staging and prognostication challenging. While some patients progress through the classically described five stages of diabetic nephropathy (DN), some with microalbuminuria regress to normoalbuminuria and do not progress, whereas some normoalbuminuric patients develop progressive renal function decline, without a preceding microalbuminuria stage [8–12]. Thus, early recognition of those at risk of progression to ESKD is the need of the hour to enable timely initiation of nephroprotective therapies to prevent or slow worsening of kidney disease and thereby attenuate DKD-associated mortality and healthcare burden.

DR is one of the microvascular complications in diabetes and approximately affects about 30% of patients with diabetes [13]. There is remarkable homology between the eye and the kidney in terms of developmental, structural, and pathophysiological pathways and it is, therefore, rather unsurprising that DKD is often closely associated with DR [14]. In patients with diabetes, glycemic and blood pressure control reduces the incidence and progression of both DR and DKD, suggesting a common pathogenesis of these two complications [15–21].

Clinically, DR is screened with fundoscopy, which is a relatively noninvasive, inexpensive method [22, 23]. It can be routinely performed during outpatient screening for chronic complications of diabetes. The presence of established DR strongly suggests DKD as the cause of kidney disease in a diabetes patient with renal dysfunction and epidemiological studies have found that DR may be a good screening tool for recognition of DN [24–30]. However, the role of DR as a predictor of progression to ESKD has not been clearly elucidated. Thus, in this systematic review and meta-analysis, we sought to pool data from available studies and obtain a more reliable estimate of the effect of DR on the risk of progression of DKD in patients with DM.

2. Methods

2.1. Search Strategy

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar was performed by two independent reviewers (M.G. and T.C.B.) for articles studying the association between DR and progression of DKD in September 2021. Using MeSH terms as well as the free words, the search strategy included the following: [((diabetic retinopathy stage OR retinopathy stage) AND (risk factor OR prognostic factor OR predict OR etiology) AND (nephropathy stage OR diabetic nephropathy stage OR DKD stage) AND (diabetic nephropathy progression OR nephropathy progression)]. The last search date was September 30, 2021.

2.2. Selection Criteria

The inclusion criteria for articles were as follows: (1) longitudinal studies (prospective and retrospective); (2) studies including patients with DM (irrespective of type of DM) and presumed or biopsy-proven DKD; (3) presence of DR defined according to well-validated scales, such as the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study severity scale; and (4) studies reporting progression of DKD. Studies with no full text, cross-sectional design, and insufficient data to compute hazards ratio (HR) (or odds ratio) for DKD progression were excluded. The rigorous eligibility criteria were strictly followed by two independent reviewers (M.G. and T.C.B.) to control for publication bias. Any disagreements in the inclusion of a paper were resolved by a third researcher (I.R.R.).

2.3. Data Extraction and Quality Assessment

Using standardized forms, data on year of publication, first author’s name, country where study was undertaken, study setting, follow-up periods, sample size, definitions of the exposure (DR) and outcome (ESKD), baseline demographic data including average age of the participants, duration of diabetes, average blood pressure, HbA1c, average eGFR values, and the reported effect estimates (HR or OR with 95% CIs) were extracted from the eligible studies.

The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist for cohort studies was used to assess the quality of the selected articles [31]. The tool contains eleven items. The evaluation scores ranged from 0 to 11, with <3 defined as “low quality,” 3–6 as “moderate quality,” and >6 as “high quality.” The JBI quality scores of included articles are provided in Table 1.

2.4. Data Synthesis and Analysis

Results were expressed as hazard ratios and odds ratios with 95% CIs. The degree of between-study heterogeneity was estimated using the Higgins and Thompson’s I² statistic, with I² of >75% indicating considerable heterogeneity. Pooled effect estimates for DR and DKD progression, as well as for DR severity and risk of DKD progression, were computed using the inverse variance method. A fixed effects model was used when between-study heterogeneity was low, while a random effects model was used if heterogeneity was high. A sensitivity analysis was performed to ascertain robustness of the obtained results. To ascertain publication bias, a funnel plot was constructed by plotting the standard errors of the studies against the corresponding HR. All analyses were performed using R version 4.1.1.

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search Results

A total of 18,275 articles were identified after a rigorous search on PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Out of these 18,275 articles, 258 articles were identified as duplicates. The remaining 18017 articles were screened based on the abstracts and titles, separately, by two independent reviewers. Any disagreements on the inclusion of a paper were resolved by the third researcher. A full-text assessment was conducted and finally 10 articles were included in the meta-analysis. The article selection process has been summarized in Figure 1.

3.2. Study Characteristics

The relevant characteristics of the selected publications are summarized in Tables 1 and 2. A total of 14,355 patients across the 10 studies are included. All included studies were judged to be of high quality, with a score of seven or more as per the JBI checklist.

3.3. DR and DKD Progression

Of the ten studies, six reported results using both HR and OR, two reported HR alone, and two reported OR alone. Therefore, results were analysed, and pooled estimates were computed as HR and OR both, separately. Since the I² statistic indicated considerable heterogeneity for both HR (I² = 75.2%, ) and OR (I² = 89%, ), a random effects model was used. The obtained results are presented in the forest plots below (Figures 2 and 3). Both pooled estimates indicated a significant association between presence of DR and DKD progression, with pooled HR of 2.42 (95% CI: 1.70–3.45) and pooled OR of 2.62 (95% CI: 1.76–3.89).

3.4. Severity of DR and DKD Progression

Four studies reported the association of severity of DR and DKD progression. Data as OR was available in three studies (Hsing 2020, Lin 2019, and Park 2019), while Yamanouchi et al. reported results as HR and raw data to compute OR was not available [32, 33, 40, 41]. Thus, data from three studies was pooled (Table 3), while the results of the Yamanouchi 2019 study are described separately below. Our meta-analysis found a pooled OR of 2.13 (95% CI: 1.82–2.50) for NPDR and 3.56 (95% CI: 2.93–4.33) for PDR.

Yamanouchi et al. also reported a similar stepwise increase in DKD progression with increasing DR severity with an HR of 1.35 (0.49–3.76) for mild NPDR, 2.89 (1.42–5.86) for moderate NPDR, 5.00 (2.63–9.52) for severe NPDR, and 5.32 (2.89–9.78) [32].

3.5. Sensitivity Analysis and Publication Bias

Sensitivity analysis was performed after excluding (a) studies that did not have biopsy-proven DKD patients and (b) studies that were retrospective. There was no significant change in the obtained results with pooled HR of 2.76 (95% CI: 1.26–6.04) and OR of 1.79 (95% CI: 1.04–3.09), respectively.

The funnel plot (Figure 4) demonstrated an asymmetric distribution of studies indicating a possible publication bias.

4. Discussion

This systematic review included ten longitudinal studies with a pooled sample size of 14,355. Meta-analysis of data from the included studies found that the presence of DR was significantly associated with DKD progression, with a pooled hazard ratio of 2.42 (95% CI: 1.70–3.45). The obtained results were consistent even when pooled estimates were reported in terms of odds ratio (OR 2.62, 95% CI:1.76–3.89). Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with presumed DKD (rather than biopsy-proven cases) and that excluding retrospective studies also yielded similar results, indicating robustness of our findings. All the included studies in our review found a significant association between DR and ESKD, except the one by Mottl et al. [35]. There are two possible factors that may explain the lack of association in the Mottl et al. study. Firstly, patients with serum creatinine of >1.5 mg/dL were excluded from this study. Hence, very few patients (<2.5%) developed ESKD during the study period and this low event rate may have influenced the results. Secondly, patients were grouped as having no/mild DR versus moderate/severe DR, rather than as having no DR versus having DR. It is important to note that this study did find that DR was associated with a nearly twofold increase in risk of doubling of serum creatinine and an increase in incident macroalbuminuria.

Furthermore, we found that the severity of DR was also significantly associated with DKD progression. There was an increase in DKD progression risk as severity of DR increased, with a pooled OR of 2.13 (95% CI: 1.82–2.50) for NPDR and 3.56 (95% CI: 2.93–4.33) for PDR. Yamanouchi et al. reported a similar relationship with HR of 1.35 (0.49–3.76) for mild NPDR, 2.89 (1.42–5.86) for moderate NPDR, 5.00 (2.63–9.52) for severe NPDR, and 5.32 (2.89–9.78) [32].

Apart from DR, the association of other retinal vascular signs and kidney disease has also been studied. Studies have found that retinal vascular diameters, derived from fundus photographs, were significantly associated with CKD. Yau et al. reported that retinal arteriolar narrowing was associated with incident CKD, while Yip et al. found that retinal venular widening was a predictor of risk of CKD [23, 42]. Lee et al. evaluated retinal perfusion status in patients with diabetes using fluorescein angiography and found that nonperfusion of more than ten-disc areas was associated with a sixfold risk of CKD progression [43].

While the association of DR and presence of DKD is already clearly established, it is unclear whether presence of DR (and its severity) is also associated with DKD progression and our study specifically answers this question. Given the unpredictable natural course of DKD, the ability to identify patients at high risk of progression of DKD using DR findings would be an invaluable clinical tool and could potentially guide the nephrologist to individualize therapies tailored to an individual’s future risk of ESKD. Tests to ascertain presence (and severity) of DR are noninvasive and economical, thereby making implementation of routine DR screening practicable.

A recent meta-analysis by Guo et al. found an association between DR and incidence of cardiovascular (CV) disease and CV mortality in patients with diabetes [44]. Therefore, a fundus examination in a patient with diabetes is necessary to not just detect DR early and prevent consequent vision loss but may also have a role in risk-stratification of patients in terms of renal and CV outcomes. Such an approach could not only improve patient outcomes but could also improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of healthcare.

This evidence provides strong support to build prediction models that can ascertain an individual’s risk of ESKD, based on fundus examination. Over the last few years, there have been major breakthroughs in automated and semiautomated retinal analysis systems using artificial intelligence (AI) [45]. Although their large-scale use is yet to become a reality, AI prediction models for DKD progression could soon become an integral part of a digital health management platform; some institutions are working on such AI prediction models which could ease the burden of healthcare workers and revolutionize the field of medicine [45, 46].

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis to formally evaluate this association of DR and DKD progression. Although the consistency of the association across different measures of effect and sensitivity analyses indicates credibility of our findings, our meta-analysis is limited by the small number of relevant studies that were obtained in the systematic review and the considerable heterogeneity between the studies. Most of the included studies were retrospective and thus carry a risk of confounding. Likewise, in most of the studies, diagnosis of DKD was presumptive and not biopsy-proven. A majority of the included studies reported association of DR and DKD progression risk in type 2 DM and so it is unclear whether the findings of this meta-analysis can be extrapolated to patients with type 1 DM.

5. Conclusion

Our meta-analysis found that DR is a strong predictor of determining progression of CKD in patients with DKD. This suggests that screening for retinal vascular changes could potentially help in prognostication and risk-stratification of patients with DKD. The severity of DR also can predict progression of DKD. Well-conducted large prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings of this study.

Disclosure

The sponsor was involved in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, interpretation of the data; preparation and review of the manuscript; and the decision to publish.

Conflicts of Interest

MG and Dr. GB are employees in Carl Zeiss Pvt. Ltd. Dr. SPN, Dr. SVB, and Dr. IRR declare consulting work for Carl Zeiss Pvt. Ltd. for a research project on DR and artificial intelligence. The statistical analysis in this study was undertaken by a consultant biostatistician, Dr. JG. The fees for the biostatistician were paid to her institution by Carl Zeiss India Pvt. Ltd.

Authors’ Contributions

MG and Dr. IRR contributed equally to this work. Literature review was conducted by MG and Dr. GB. MG, Dr. IRR, and Dr. JG extracted and analysed the data. MG and Dr. IRR drafted the manuscript and Dr. SPN, Dr. SVB, and Dr. GB contributed to revision and editing. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript. All authors had full access to all the data in this study.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Carl Zeiss India (Bangalore) Pvt. Ltd. The sponsor also supported the journal’s article processing charges (APC).

References

H. Sun, P. Saeedi, S. Karuranga et al., “IDF diabetes Atlas: global, regional and country-level diabetes prevalence estimates for 2021 and projections for 2045,” Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, vol. 183, Article ID 109119, 2022.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. C. Thomas, M. Brownlee, K. Susztak et al., “Diabetic kidney disease,” Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, vol. 1, Article ID 15018, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. T. Reutens, “Epidemiology of diabetic kidney disease,” Medical Clinics of North America, vol. 97, no. 1, pp. 1–18, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
K. A. McBrien, B. J. Manns, B. Chui et al., “Health care costs in people with diabetes and their association with glycemic control and kidney function,” Diabetes Care, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1172–1180, 2013.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Nag, R. Bilous, W. Kelly, S. Jones, N. Roper, and V. Connolly, “All-cause and cardiovascular mortality in diabetic subjects increases significantly with reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR): 10 years’ data from the South Tees Diabetes Mortality study,” Diabetic Medicine, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 10–17, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Cea Soriano, S. Johansson, B. Stefansson, and L. A. G. Rodríguez, “Cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in a cohort of 57,946 patients with type 2 diabetes: associations with renal function and cardiovascular risk factors,” Cardiovascular Diabetology, vol. 14, no. 1, p. 38, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. M. Berhane, E. J. Weil, W. C. Knowler, R. G. Nelson, and R. L. Hanson, “Albuminuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate as predictors of diabetic end-stage renal disease and death,” Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 2444–2451, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. E. Mogensen, C. K. Christensen, and E. Vittinghus, “The stages in diabetic renal disease: with emphasis on the stage of incipient diabetic nephropathy,” Diabetes, vol. 32, no. Supplement_2, pp. 64–78, 1983.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
B. A. Perkins, L. H. Ficociello, K. H. Silva, D. M. Finkelstein, J. H. Warram, and A. S. Krolewski, “Regression of microalbuminuria in type 1 diabetes,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 348, no. 23, pp. 2285–2293, 2003.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-i. Araki, M. Haneda, T. Sugimoto et al., “Factors associated with frequent remission of microalbuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 2983–2987, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Giorgino, L. Laviola, P. Cavallo Perin, B. Solnica, J. Fuller, and N. Chaturvedi, “Factors associated with progression to macroalbuminuria in microalbuminuric Type 1 diabetic patients: the EURODIAB Prospective Complications Study,” Diabetologia, vol. 47, no. 6, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. M. Thorn, D. Gordin, V. Harjutsalo et al., “The presence and consequence of nonalbuminuric chronic kidney disease in patients with type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes Care, vol. 38, no. 11, pp. 2128–2133, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Y. Wong, C. M. G. Cheung, M. Larsen, S. Sharma, and R. Simó, “Diabetic retinopathy,” Nature Reviews Disease Primers, vol. 2, no. 1, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. W. Wong, T. Y. Wong, C.-Y. Cheng, and C. Sabanayagam, “Kidney and eye diseases: common risk factors, etiological mechanisms, and pathways,” Kidney International, vol. 85, no. 6, pp. 1290–1302, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q. Mohamed, M. C. Gillies, and T. Y. Wong, “Management of diabetic retinopathy,” JAMA, vol. 298, no. 8, p. 902, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Diabetes, Complications Trial Research Group, D. M. Nathan et al., “The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus,” New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 329, no. 14, pp. 977–986, 1993.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
UK Prospective Diabets Study (UKPDS) Group, “Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33),” The Lancet, vol. 352, pp. 837–853, 1998.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Shichiri, H. Kishikawa, Y. Ohkubo, and N. Wake, “Long-term results of the Kumamoto Study on optimal diabetes control in type 2 diabetic patients,” Diabetes Care, vol. 23, no. Suppl 2, pp. B21–B29, 2000.
View at: Google Scholar
A. I. Adler, I. M. Stratton, H. A. Neil et al., “Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study,” Bmj, vol. 321, no. 7258, pp. 412–419, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Berl, L. G. Hunsicker, J. B. Lewis et al., “Impact of achieved blood pressure on cardiovascular outcomes in the irbesartan diabetic nephropathy trial,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 2170–2179, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. A. Pohl, S. Blumenthal, D. J. Cordonnier et al., “Independent and additive impact of blood pressure control and angiotensin II receptor blockade on renal outcomes in the irbesartan diabetic nephropathy trial: clinical implications and limitations,” Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, vol. 16, no. 10, pp. 3027–3037, 2005.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Cankurtaran, M. Inanc, K. Tekin, and F. Turgut, “Retinal microcirculation in predicting diabetic nephropathy in type 2 diabetic patients without retinopathy,” Ophthalmologica, vol. 243, no. 4, pp. 271–279, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Yip, P. G. Ong, B. W. Teo et al., “Retinal vascular imaging markers and incident chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 9374, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. K. Rani, R. Raman, A. Gupta, S. S. Pal, V. Kulothungan, and T. Sharma, “Albuminuria and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus sankara nethralaya diabetic retinopathy epidemiology and molecular genetic study (SN-DREAMS, report 12),” Diabetology & Metabolic Syndrome, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 9, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. R. Manaviat, M. Afkhami, and M. R. Shoja, “Retinopathy and microalbuminuria in type II diabetic patients,” BMC Ophthalmology, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 9, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R.-A. Pedro, S.-A. Ramon, B.-B. Marc, F.-B. Juan, and M.-M. Isabel, “Prevalence and relationship between diabetic retinopathy and nephropathy, and its risk factors in the north-east of Spain, a population-based study,” Ophthalmic Epidemiology, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 251–265, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y.-H. Chen, H.-S. Chen, and D.-C. Tarng, “More impact of microalbuminuria on retinopathy than moderately reduced GFR among type 2 diabetic patients,” Diabetes Care, vol. 35, no. 4, pp. 803–808, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. Y. Wong, A. Shankar, R. Klein, and B. E. K. Klein, “Retinal vessel diameters and the incidence of gross proteinuria and renal insufficiency in people with type 1 diabetes,” Diabetes, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 179–184, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Sabanayagam, V. H. X. Foo, M. K. Ikram et al., “Is chronic kidney disease associated with diabetic retinopathy in Asian adults?” Journal of Diabetes, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 556–563, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Klein, B. E. K. Klein, S. E. Moss, and T. Y. Wong, “Retinal vessel caliber and microvascular and macrovascular disease in type 2 diabetes,” Ophthalmology, vol. 114, no. 10, pp. 1884–1892, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Moola, Z. Munn, C. Tufanaru et al., “Chapter 7: systematic reviews of etiology and risk,” JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, JBI, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Yamanouchi, M. Mori, J. Hoshino et al., “Retinopathy progression and the risk of end-stage kidney disease: results from a longitudinal Japanese cohort of 232 patients with type 2 diabetes and biopsy-proven diabetic kidney disease,” BMJ open diabetes research & care, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID e000726, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S.-C. Hsing, C.-C. Lee, C. Lin, J.-T. Chen, Y.-H. Chen, and W.-H. Fang, “The severity of diabetic retinopathy is an independent factor for the progression of diabetic nephropathy,” Journal of Clinical Medicine, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 3, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Zhao, H. Ren, J. Zhang et al., “Diabetic retinopathy, classified using the lesion-aware deep learning system, predicts diabetic end-stage renal disease in Chinese patients,” Endocrine Practice, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 429–443, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. K. Mottl, N. Pajewski, V. Fonseca et al., “The degree of retinopathy is equally predictive for renal and macrovascular outcomes in the ACCORD Trial,” Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 874–879, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhang, Y. Wang, L. Li et al., “Diabetic retinopathy may predict the renal outcomes of patients with diabetic nephropathy,” Renal Failure, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 243–251, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C.-C. Hung, H. Y.-H. Lin, D.-Y. Hwang et al., “Diabetic retinopathy and clinical parameters favoring the presence of diabetic nephropathy could predict renal outcome in patients with diabetic kidney disease,” Scientific Reports, vol. 7, no. 1, Article ID 1236, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. S. Alwakeel, A. C. Isnani, A. Alsuwaida et al., “Factors affecting the progression of diabetic nephropathy and its complications: a single-center experience in Saudi Arabia,” Annals of Saudi Medicine, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 236–242, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Hong, A. Surapaneni, N. Daya et al., “Retinopathy and risk of kidney disease in persons with diabetes,” Kidney medicine, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 808–815, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-T. Lin, C.-M. Zheng, Y.-C. Wu et al., “Diabetic retinopathy as a risk factor for chronic kidney disease progression: a multicenter case-control study in Taiwan,” Nutrients, vol. 11, no. 3, p. 509, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. C. Park, Y.-K. Lee, A. Cho et al., “Diabetic retinopathy is a prognostic factor for progression of chronic kidney disease in the patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus,” PloS one, vol. 14, no. 7, Article ID e0220506, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. W. Y. Yau, J. Xie, R. Kawasaki et al., “Retinal arteriolar narrowing and subsequent development of CKD stage 3: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA),” American Journal of Kidney Diseases, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. J. Lee, L. Sobrin, M. H. Kang et al., “Ischemic diabetic retinopathy as a possible prognostic factor for chronic kidney disease progression,” Eye, vol. 28, no. 9, pp. 1119–1125, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Y. Guo, B. Cao, X. Wu, J. J. W. Lee, and B. C.-Y. Zee, “Prospective association between diabetic retinopathy and cardiovascular disease-A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies,” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 1688–1695, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Grzybowski, P. Brona, G. Lim et al., “Artificial intelligence for diabetic retinopathy screening: a review,” Eye, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 451–460, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Retrospective collection and analysis of nephrology and ophthalmology clinical data to assess the relationship of diabetic nephropathy and diabetic retinopathy and the prospect of developing predictive machine learning algorithms in diabetic population. clinical trial registry of India, CTRI number: CTRI/2021/08/035391, updated november 11, 2021, https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/rmaindet.php?trialid=56288&EncHid=18674.89278&modid=1&compid=19.

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Mansi Gupta et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

1677

Downloads

866

Citations